ecotoxicity testing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

93
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 773 ◽  
pp. 145576
Author(s):  
Ula Rozman ◽  
Tilen Turk ◽  
Tina Skalar ◽  
Marija Zupančič ◽  
Nataša Čelan Korošin ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 267 ◽  
pp. 115650
Author(s):  
Rongxue Cui ◽  
Sun-Hwa Nam ◽  
Youn-Joo An


Chemosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 127240
Author(s):  
Madeline Louise Ianna ◽  
Amanda Reichelt-Brushett ◽  
Pelli Louise Howe ◽  
Donald Brushett


Nanomaterials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca-Vanesa Boros ◽  
Vasile Ostafe

This paper describes the ecotoxicological effects of nanomaterials (NMs) as well as their testing methods. Standard ecotoxicity testing methods are applicable to nanomaterials as well but require some adaptation. We have taken into account methods that meet several conditions. They must be properly researched by a minimum of ten scientific articles where adaptation of the method to the NMs is also presented; use organisms suitable for simple and rapid ecotoxicity testing (SSRET); have a test period shorter than 30 days; require no special equipment; have low costs and have the possibility of optimization for high-throughput screening. From the standard assays described in guidelines developed by organizations such as Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and United States Environmental Protection Agency, which meet the required conditions, we selected as methods adaptable for NMs, some methods based on algae, duckweed, amphipods, daphnids, chironomids, terrestrial plants, nematodes and earthworms. By analyzing the effects of NMs on a wide range of organisms, it has been observed that these effects can be of several categories, such as behavioral, morphological, cellular, molecular or genetic effects. By comparing the EC50 values of some NMs it has been observed that such values are available mainly for aquatic ecotoxicity, with the most sensitive test being the algae assay. The most toxic NMs overall were the silver NMs.



2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-293
Author(s):  
Paul Sibley ◽  
Laurent Lagadic ◽  
Matt McCoole ◽  
Teresa Norberg‐King ◽  
Ivo Roessink ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Arie Vonk ◽  
Michiel H. S. Kraak

Abstract The aim of the present review was to give an overview of the current state of science concerning herbicide exposure and toxicity to aquatic primary producers. To this end we assessed the open literature, revealing the widespread presence of (mixtures of) herbicides, inevitably leading to the exposure of non-target primary producers. Yet, herbicide concentrations show strong temporal and spatial variations. Concerning herbicide toxicity, it was concluded that the most sensitive as well as the least sensitive species differed per herbicide and that the observed effect concentrations for some herbicides were rather independent from the exposure time. More extensive ecotoxicity testing is required, especially considering macrophytes and marine herbicide toxicity. Hence, it was concluded that the largest knowledge gap concerns the effects of sediment-associated herbicides on primary producers in the marine/estuarine environment. Generally, there is no actual risk of waterborne herbicides to aquatic primary producers. Still, median concentrations of atrazine and especially of diuron measured in China, the USA and Europe represented moderate risks for primary producers. Maximum concentrations due to misuse and accidents may even cause the exceedance of almost 60% of the effect concentrations plotted in SSDs. Using bioassays to determine the effect of contaminated water and sediment and to identify the herbicides of concern is a promising addition to chemical analysis, especially for the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides using photosynthesis as endpoint in the bioassays. This review concluded that to come to a reliable herbicide hazard and risk assessment, an extensive catch-up must be made concerning macrophytes, the marine environment and especially sediment as overlooked and understudied environmental compartments.



2019 ◽  
Vol 681 ◽  
pp. 292-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziana Di Lorenzo ◽  
Walter Dario Di Marzio ◽  
Barbara Fiasca ◽  
Diana Maria Paola Galassi ◽  
Kathryn Korbel ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document