recovery technique
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

419
(FIVE YEARS 68)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 3205-3219
Author(s):  
Magda M. Madbouly ◽  
Yasser F. Mokhtar ◽  
Saad M. Darwish

Author(s):  
Vamshi Krishna Miryala ◽  
Vibhav Pandey ◽  
Kamalesh Hatua ◽  
Subhashish Bhattacharya

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunni Nugraha Priadi ◽  
Hadi Ismoyo ◽  
Alexandra Sinta Wahjudewanti

Abstract The X and Y fields are among the oil fields in the Java basin, Indonesia. As oil production decreases due to exploitation activities in X and Y fields, it is necessary to carry out activities to increase production. To increase the yield of its oil production, Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) technology is needed. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique screening analysis is needed to be carried out at the initial stage of the feasibility study in the EOR project. At present, there is no fully established method for identifying potential candidates for the EOR technique. The most common approach for selecting EOR techniques is conventional filtering, which is generally based on the "go-no go" trial and error, with a reduced chance of success. Besides, determining potential candidates for EOR techniques often uses a reservoirsimulation approach, but this is time-consuming and requires high costs in using the software license. EOR technique screening with a method that explains how to form a multi-criteria decision-making model with a combination of AHP and TOPSIS methods together as a systematic and measurable method to get the best EOR techniques in both X and Y fields. The research results found that the CO2Immiscible Technique was the most appropriate for EOR in fields X and Y because it has the highest preference value (0.676), is then followed by the Micellar technique (preference value 0.645) and HC Immiscible (preference value 0.517). With the multi-criteria decision-making technique, the best EOR technique results are obtained. Then the proposal can provide valuable recommendations for company management in both fields X and Y with a faster, accurate, and inexpensive method compared to the reservoir simulation method, which has a longer processing time and more expensive costs. This technique can support technology implementation decision-making in the early stages of EOR project development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (17) ◽  
pp. 8120
Author(s):  
Mohd. Ahmed ◽  
Devinder Singh ◽  
Saeed AlQadhi ◽  
Majed A. Alrefae

The Zienkiewicz–Zhu (ZZ) super-convergent patch recovery technique based on a node neighborhood patch configuration is used most widely for recovery of the stress field of a finite element analysis. In this study, an improved ZZ recovery technique using element neighborhood patch configuration is proposed. The improved recovery procedure is based on recovery of the stress field in the least-squares sense over an element patch that consists of the union of the elements surrounding the element under consideration. The proposed patch configuration provides more sampling points and improves the performance of the standard ZZ recovery technique. The effectiveness and reliability of the improved ZZ recovery approach is demonstrated through plane elastic and plastic plate problems. The problem domain is discretized with triangular and quadrilateral elements of different sizes. A comparison of the quality of error estimation using the ZZ recovery of derivative field and recovery of the displacement field using similar element neighborhood patch configurations is also presented. The numerical results show that the ZZ recovery technique and the displacement recovery technique, using a modified patch configuration, yield better results, convergence rate, and effectivity as compared with the standard ZZ super-convergent patch recovery technique. It is concluded that the improved ZZ recovery technique-based adaptive finite element analysis is very effective for converging a predefined accuracy with a significantly smaller number of degrees of freedom, especially in an elastic problem. It is also concluded that the improved ZZ recovery technique captures the plastic deformation problem solution errors more reliably than the standard ZZ recovery technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document