flux parameterization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

67
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Difu Sun ◽  
Junqiang Song ◽  
Hongze Leng ◽  
Kaijun Ren ◽  
Xiaoyong Li

The Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport model has been used to simulate Super Typhoon Yutu (2018). The impacts of four momentum transfer parameterization schemes (COARE, TY, OT, and DN) and three heat transfer parameterization schemes (COARE, GR, and ZK) on typhoon modelling have been studied by means of the track, intensity, and radial structure of typhoon. The results show that the track of Yutu is not sensitive to the choice of parameterization scheme, while the combinations of different parameterization schemes affect the intensity of Yutu. Among the four momentum flux parameterization schemes, three wave-state-based schemes (TY, OT, and DN) provide better intensity results than the wind-speed-based COARE scheme, but the differences between the three wave-state-based schemes are not obvious. Among the three heat flux parameterization schemes, the results of the GR scheme are slightly better than those of the COARE scheme, and both the GR and COARE schemes are significantly better than the ZK scheme, from which the intensity of Yutu is underpredicted obviously. The influence of the combination of different parameterization schemes on the intensity of the typhoon is also reflected in the radial structure of the typhoon, and the radial structure of the typhoon simulated by experiments with stronger typhoon intensity also develops faster. Differences of intensity between experiments are due mainly to the differences in sea surface heat flux, the enthalpy transferred from sea surface to the atmosphere has a significant impact on the bottom atmosphere wind field, and there is a strong correspondence between the distribution of enthalpy flux and the bottom wind field.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Comola ◽  
Jasper Kok ◽  
Juan Lora ◽  
Kaylie Cohanim ◽  
Xinting Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, is characterized by gigantic linear dunes and an active dust cycle. Much like on Earth, these and other aeolian processes are caused by the wind-driven mobilization of surface grains, known as saltation. To date, very little is known about the conditions that allow for the occurrence of saltation on Titan. In fact, Titan saltation may be fundamentally different from Earth saltation given the denser atmosphere, the lower gravity, and the cohesion of its surface grains. Here, we draw on experiments, theory, and modeling to progress towards a comprehensive understanding of saltation on Titan. We find that aerodynamic lifting of surface grains requires strong wind speeds due to the high cohesion of the grains. However, saltation may be sustained through granular splash at wind speeds much smaller than those required to initiate grain motion. This suggests that most saltation transport on Titan is intermittent rather than continuous. We account for these insights by proposing a saltation mass flux parameterization specific for Titan conditions that accounts for transport intermittency, and use it to quantify yearly sediment transport with a general circulation model. The results show that Titan's prevailing atmospheric circulation is capable of generating highly intermittent yet significant saltation, yielding yearly transport rates similar to those on the most active dunes of Mars. Furthermore, we find that accounting for surface topography might be critical to answering open questions related to Titan's landscape evolution, including the formation of linear dunes in opposite direction to the prevailing circulation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 793-809
Author(s):  
Kay Suselj ◽  
Joao Teixeira ◽  
Marcin J. Kurowski ◽  
Andrea Molod

AbstractA systematic underestimation of subtropical planetary boundary layer (PBL) stratocumulus clouds by the GEOS model has been significantly improved by a new eddy-diffusivity/mass-flux (EDMF) parameterization. The EDMF parameterization represents the subgrid-scale transport in the dry and moist parts of the PBL in a unified manner and it combines an adjusted eddy-diffusivity PBL scheme from GEOS with a stochastic multiplume mass-flux model. The new EDMF version of the GEOS model is first compared against the CONTROL version in a single-column model (SCM) framework for two benchmark cases representing subtropical stratocumulus and shallow cumulus clouds, and validated against large-eddy simulations. Global simulations are performed and compared against observations and reanalysis data. The results show that the EDMF version of the GEOS model produces more realistic subtropical PBL clouds. The EDMF improvements first detected in the SCM framework translate into similar improvements of the global GEOS model.


2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (12) ◽  
pp. 4917-4941
Author(s):  
Ron McTaggart-Cowan ◽  
Paul A. Vaillancourt ◽  
Leo Separovic ◽  
Shawn Corvec ◽  
Ayrton Zadra

AbstractNumerical models that are unable to resolve moist convection in the atmosphere employ physical parameterizations to represent the effects of the associated processes on the resolved-scale state. Most of these schemes are designed to represent the dominant class of cumulus convection that is driven by latent heat release in a conditionally unstable profile with a surplus of convective available potential energy (CAPE). However, an important subset of events occurs in low-CAPE environments in which potential and symmetric instabilities can sustain moist convective motions. Convection schemes that are dependent on the presence of CAPE are unable to depict accurately the effects of cumulus convection in these cases. A mass-flux parameterization is developed to represent such events, with triggering and closure components that are specifically designed to depict subgrid-scale convection in low-CAPE profiles. Case studies show that the scheme eliminates the “bull’s-eyes” in precipitation guidance that develop in the absence of parameterized convection, and that it can represent the initiation of elevated convection that organizes squall-line structure. The introduction of the parameterization leads to significant improvements in the quality of quantitative precipitation forecasts, including a large reduction in the frequency of spurious heavy-precipitation events predicted by the model. An evaluation of surface and upper-air guidance shows that the scheme systematically improves the model solution in the warm season, a result that suggests that the parameterization is capable of accurately representing the effects of moist convection in a range of low-CAPE environments.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxu Shi ◽  
Dirk Notz ◽  
Jiping Liu ◽  
Hu Yang ◽  
Gerrit Lohmann

Abstract. We investigate the impact of three different parameterizations of ice-ocean heat exchange on modeled ice thickness, ice concentration, and water masses. These three parameterizations are (1) an ice-bath assumption with the ocean temperature fixed at the freezing temperature, (2) a turbulent heat-flux parameterization with ice-ocean heat exchange depending linearly on the temperature difference between the mixed layer and the ice-ocean interface, and (3) a similar turbulent heat-flux parameterization as (2) but with the temperature at the ice-ocean interface depending on ice-ablation rate. Based on model simulations with the standalone sea-ice model CICE, the ice-ocean model MPIOM and the climate model COSMOS, we find that (3) leads (in comparison to the other two parameterizations) to a thicker modeled sea ice, warmer water beneath high-concentration ice and cooler water towards the ice edge, and higher salinity in the Arctic Ocean mixed layer. Finally, in the fully coupled climate model COSMOS, the most realistic parameterization leads to an enhanced Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), a more positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) mode and a weakened Aleutian Low.


2020 ◽  
Vol 177 (8) ◽  
pp. 4025-4044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subrat Kumar Mallick ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Rashmi Sharma ◽  
K. V. S. R. Prasad ◽  
S. S. V. S. Ramakrishna

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document