hermite splines
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

43
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
pp. 2458
Author(s):  
Mariantonia Cotronei ◽  
Caroline Moosmüller

This paper deals with polynomial Hermite splines. In the first part, we provide a simple and fast procedure to compute the refinement mask of the Hermite B-splines of any order and in the case of a general scaling factor. Our procedure is solely derived from the polynomial reproduction properties satisfied by Hermite splines and it does not require the explicit construction or evaluation of the basis functions. The second part of the paper discusses the factorization properties of the Hermite B-spline masks in terms of the augmented Taylor operator, which is shown to be the minimal annihilator for the space of discrete monomial Hermite sequences of a fixed degree. All our results can be of use, in particular, in the context of Hermite subdivision schemes and multi-wavelets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
J. Saeidian ◽  
M. Sarfraz ◽  
A. Azizi ◽  
S. Jalilian

Suppose we have a constrained set of data and wish to approximate it using a suitable function. It is natural to require the approximant to preserve the constraints. In this work, we state the problem in an interpolating setting and propose a parameter-based method and use the well-known cubic Hermite splines to interpolate the data with a constrained spline to provide with a C 1 interpolant. Then, more smoothing constraints are added to obtain C 2 continuity. Additionally, a minimization criterion is presented as a theoretical support to the proposed study; this is performed using linear programming. The proposed methods are demonstrated with illustrious examples.


2021 ◽  
Vol 247 ◽  
pp. 03011
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Gibson ◽  
Steven J. Douglass

In the implementation of the equivalence-in-dilution self-shielding method, multigroup cross sections as a function of the background cross section (i.e., the dilution) are needed. The background cross section of a particular nuclide in a particular material is determined iteratively based on geometry and material composition, resulting in a large number of cross section look-ups and a continuously varying dilution as the independent variable. Typically, multigroup cross sections are interpolated based on a reference grid of a set of dilution values and corresponding cross sections. The selection of this grid and the interpolant used between the grid are not well-documented in the literature, and so the approach used by the Bengal code is of note to the technical community. This work compares the interpolation scheme of the legacy code TRANSX to a newly developed interpolation scheme based on cubic Hermite splines, both by looking at the relative error in generated cross sections and by assessing the impact on a simple reactor simulation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Dębski

One of the key elements of real-time $C^1$-continuous cubic spline interpolation of streaming data is an estimator of the first derivative of the interpolated function that is more accurate than the ones based on finite difference schemas.Two such greedy look-ahead heuristic estimators (denoted as MinBE and MinAJ2) based on Calculus of Variations are formally defined (in closed form) together with the corresponding cubic splines they generate, and then comparatively evaluated in a series of numerical experiments involving different types of performance measures. The results presented show that the cubic Hermite splines generated by heuristic MinAJ2 significantly outperformed these based on finite difference schemas in terms of all tested performance measures (including convergence).The proposed approach is quite general. It can be directly applied to streams of univariate functional data like time-series. Multidimensional curves defined parametrically, after splitting, can be handled as well. The streaming character of the algorithm means that it can also be useful in processing data sets that are too large to fit in memory (e.g., edge computing devices, embedded time-series databases).


2020 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 106524
Author(s):  
Lucia Romani ◽  
Alberto Viscardi
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 368 ◽  
pp. 112503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Fageot ◽  
Shayan Aziznejad ◽  
Michael Unser ◽  
Virginie Uhlmann

2019 ◽  
Vol 626 ◽  
pp. A108
Author(s):  
V. A. Baturin ◽  
W. Däppen ◽  
A. V. Oreshina ◽  
S. V. Ayukov ◽  
A. B. Gorshkov

Aims. We use Hermite splines to interpolate pressure and its derivatives simultaneously, thereby preserving mathematical relations between the derivatives. The method therefore guarantees that thermodynamic identities are obeyed even between mesh points. In addition, our method enables an estimation of the precision of the interpolation by comparing the Hermite-spline results with those of frequent cubic (B-) spline interpolation. Methods. We have interpolated pressure as a function of temperature and density with quintic Hermite 2D-splines. The Hermite interpolation requires knowledge of pressure and its first and second derivatives at every mesh point. To obtain the partial derivatives at the mesh points, we used tabulated values if given or else thermodynamic equalities, or, if not available, values obtained by differentiating B-splines. Results. The results were obtained with the grid of the SAHA-S equation-of-state (EOS) tables. The maximum lgP difference lies in the range from 10−9 to 10−4, and Γ1 difference varies from 10−9 to 10−3. Specifically, for the points of a solar model, the maximum differences are one order of magnitude smaller than the aforementioned values. The poorest precision is found in the dissociation and ionization regions, occurring at T ∼ 1.5 × 103−105 K. The best precision is achieved at higher temperatures, T >  105 K. To discuss the significance of the interpolation errors we compare them with the corresponding difference between two different equation-of-state formalisms, SAHA-S and OPAL 2005. We find that the interpolation errors of the pressure are a few orders of magnitude less than the differences from between the physical formalisms, which is particularly true for the solar-model points.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document