antitumor antibodies
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

46
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e002193
Author(s):  
Sigrid P Dubois ◽  
Milos D Miljkovic ◽  
Thomas A Fleisher ◽  
Stefania Pittaluga ◽  
Jennifer Hsu-Albert ◽  
...  

BackgroundFull application of cytokines as oncoimmunotherapeutics requires identification of optimal regimens. Our initial effort with intravenous bolus recombinant human interleukin-15 (rhIL-15) was limited by postinfusional reactions. Subcutaneous injection and continuous intravenous infusion for 10 days (CIV-10) provided rhIL-15 with less toxicity with CIV-10 giving the best increases in CD8+ lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells. To ease rhIL-15 administration, we shortened time of infusion. Treatment with rhIL-15 at a dose of 3–5 µg/kg as a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (CIV-5) had no dose-limiting toxicities while effector cell stimulation was comparable to the CIV-10 regimen.MethodsEleven patients with metastatic cancers were treated with rhIL-15 CIV-5, 3 µg (n=4), 4 µg (n=3), and 5 µg/kg/day (n=4) in a phase I dose-escalation study (April 6, 2012).ResultsImpressive expansions of NK cells were seen at all dose levels (mean 34-fold), including CD56bright NK cells (mean 144-fold for 4 µg/kg), as well as an increase in CD8+ T cells (mean 3.38-fold). At 5 µg/kg/day, there were no dose-limiting toxicities but pulmonary capillary leak and slower patient recovery. This led to our choice of the 4 µg/kg as CIV-5 dose for further testing. Cytolytic capacity of CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells was increased by interleukin-15 assayed by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), natural cytotoxicity and natural killer group 2D-mediated cytotoxicity. The best response was stable disease.ConclusionsIL-15 administered as CIV-5 substantially expanded NK cells with increased cytotoxic functions. Tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies dependent on ADCC as their mechanism of action including alemtuzumab, obinutuzumab, avelumab, and mogamulizumab could benefit from those NK cell expansions and provide a promising therapeutic strategy.Trial registration numbersNCT01572493, NCT03759184, NCT03905135, NCT04185220 and NCT02689453.


2020 ◽  
Vol 205 (10) ◽  
pp. 2883-2892
Author(s):  
Jailal N. Ablack ◽  
Jesus Ortiz ◽  
Jeevisha Bajaj ◽  
Kathleen Trinh ◽  
Frederic Lagarrigue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilson Baia ◽  
Amy Manning-Bog ◽  
Alexander Scholz ◽  
Jeff DeFalco ◽  
Michael Harbell ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 3592-3599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn van Rosmalen ◽  
Yan Ni ◽  
Daan F. M. Vervoort ◽  
Remco Arts ◽  
Susann K. J. Ludwig ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (19) ◽  
pp. E2646-E2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan T. Sockolosky ◽  
Michael Dougan ◽  
Jessica R. Ingram ◽  
Chia Chi M. Ho ◽  
Monique J. Kauke ◽  
...  

Therapeutic antitumor antibodies treat cancer by mobilizing both innate and adaptive immunity. CD47 is an antiphagocytic ligand exploited by tumor cells to blunt antibody effector functions by transmitting an inhibitory signal through its receptor signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα). Interference with the CD47–SIRPα interaction synergizes with tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies to eliminate human tumor xenografts by enhancing macrophage-mediated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), but synergy between CD47 blockade and ADCP has yet to be demonstrated in immunocompetent hosts. Here, we show that CD47 blockade alone or in combination with a tumor-specific antibody fails to generate antitumor immunity against syngeneic B16F10 tumors in mice. Durable tumor immunity required programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in combination with an antitumor antibody, with incorporation of CD47 antagonism substantially improving response rates. Our results highlight an underappreciated contribution of the adaptive immune system to anti-CD47 adjuvant therapy and suggest that targeting both innate and adaptive immune checkpoints can potentiate the vaccinal effect of antitumor antibody therapy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 943-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Rabu ◽  
Richard McIntosh ◽  
Zuzana Jurasova ◽  
Lindy Durrant
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (36) ◽  
pp. 4828-4836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne L. Topalian ◽  
George J. Weiner ◽  
Drew M. Pardoll

Cancer immunotherapy comprises a variety of treatment approaches, incorporating the tremendous specificity of the adaptive immune system (T cells and antibodies) as well as the diverse and potent cytotoxic weaponry of both adaptive and innate immunity. Immunotherapy strategies include antitumor monoclonal antibodies, cancer vaccines, adoptive transfer of ex vivo activated T and natural killer cells, and administration of antibodies or recombinant proteins that either costimulate immune cells or block immune inhibitory pathways (so-called immune checkpoints). Although clear clinical efficacy has been demonstrated with antitumor antibodies since the late 1990s, other immunotherapies had not been shown to be effective until recently, when a spate of successes established the broad potential of this therapeutic modality. These successes are based on fundamental scientific advances demonstrating the toleragenic nature of cancer and the pivotal role of the tumor immune microenvironment in suppressing antitumor immunity. New therapies based on a sophisticated knowledge of immune-suppressive cells, soluble factors, and signaling pathways are designed to break tolerance and reactivate antitumor immunity to induce potent, long-lasting responses. Preclinical models indicate the importance of a complex integrated immune response in eliminating established tumors and validate the exploration of combinatorial treatment regimens, which are anticipated to be far more effective than monotherapies. Unlike conventional cancer therapies, most immunotherapies are active and dynamic, capable of inducing immune memory to propagate a successful rebalancing of the equilibrium between tumor and host.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document