RECHTSVINDING METHOD OF JUDGES IN FILLING LEGAL EMPTY "STUDY OF APPROACHES IN LEGAL DISCOVERY"

One of the important stages in the world of justice is the stage of legal discovery by judges to resolve cases that are being disputed. Many new cases emerge and escape from existing legal rules resulting in a legal vacuum, while judges must not refuse to examine, try and decide on cases that come to them on the grounds of lack of law or unclear regulation. Judges are required to find the law in resolving disputes. On the other hand, the implementation of procedural law shows a formalistic, positivistic, and textualist image, and the condition is assumed to be a part that contributes to the method of legal discovery by judges and the quality of decisions produced. In a pluralistic state of law such as in Indonesia, of course, the legal discovery of justice must be based on the perspective and method of studying legal science. The study must not stop let alone rely only on the perspective of positive legal ansicht. It is important for judges to accommodate perspectives, approaches, theories, rules, and other legal norms such as Islamic Law with the Istinbath Al-Ahkam method and Customary Law with their very varied and characteristic views on the law. The comprehensive review is expected to have an impact on the inclusiveness of judges in harmonizing all approaches and legal systems that apply in their decisions and does not consider the position of the text of the legislation to be final and free from penetration of the interpretation of reason that develops in accordance with the behavior of the community, which is very dynamic.

GSM based Face Recognition using Pir Sensor on Raspberry Pi 3

We Developed An Associate Approach To The Detection And Identification Of Human Faces And Describe A Operating, Near-Real-Time Face Recognition System That Tracks A Subject’s Face And So Acknowledges The Person By Comparison Characteristics Of The Face To Database. Our Approach Treats Face Recognition As A Two-Dimensional Recognition Downside, Taking Advantage Of The Very Fact That Faces Area Unit Area Unit Normally Upright And Therefore Is Also Delineate By A Small Set Of 2-D Characteristic Views. Face Pictures Are Projected Onto A Feature Area (“Face Space”) That Best Encodes The Variation Among Database Images. The Face Area Is Outlined By The “Eigenfaces”, That Area Unit The Eigenvectors Of The Set Of Faces; They Do Not Essentially Correspond To Isolated Options Like Eyes, Ears, And Noses. The Framework Provides The Flexibility To Be Told To Acknowledge New Faces

Socratic Ethics and Moral Psychology

This chapter considers the following question: If Plato is our main source of knowledge about Socrates, how can we tell when Plato’s “Socrates” speaks for Socrates and when he speaks for Plato? Among the 30 or so dialogues traditionally attributed to Plato, there is a group of 11 or 12 that share certain features setting them apart from the rest. In these dialogues, which are considerably shorter than the others, Socrates always has the role of questioner. Many scholars agree that these shorter dialogues were intended to portray the characteristic views and arguments of the historical Socrates; for this reason, these dialogues are also called “Socratic.” In fact, a number of scholars believe that these dialogues contain a Socratic “theory” of the virtues: a unified, systematic account of their nature and value. According to this view, one of Plato’s intentions in writing these dialogues was to set out this systematic account of the virtues, and to defend it with arguments used by Socrates. However, there are problems with this view. The chapter suggests that while these dialogues are “Socratic” in the sense that they focus on the views and style of discussion of the historical Socrates, they were not intended to give a unified Socratic theory of the virtues—for the good reason that Socrates in all likelihood did not have a unified theory of the virtues.

Knowledge Management

Although the debate on the nature of ‘knowledge’ and ‘information’ is far from settled, it is now taken for granted throughout the academic world that the two notions are related but fundamentally distinct. This result, and its significant consequences, still need to be realised and understood by the great majority of the business world. In the first section of this chapter, we briefly comment on some characteristic views of ‘knowledge’ and ‘knowledge management,’ and subsequently we analyse in-depth the core constituent notion of the latter, that is, knowledge. In section two, we outline three major consequences of our analysis. The first concerns the limits of management for a certain class of activities involving knowledge. The second concerns the scope and limits of technology for the same class of activities. The third concerns the issue of knowledge market. The thesis we develop is that knowledge cannot be taken as a commodity; in other words, the notion of a knowledge market is not implementable.