Software Quality Model in the Presence of Culture Quality Factors

Researchers have often attempted to raise the success rate of software systems over the past century. Improve software quality models and other software elements to make it more customer satisfaction and achieve customer permanence. Several quality models and variables have been proposed to decrease software system failure and complexity. Also, several software quality models were proposed to assess the general and particular types of software products. These models have been proposed to determine the general or particular scopes of software products. The proposed models evaluate based on comparisons between the well-known models to customize the closed model. These comparisons are the leakage of criteria based on distinct views and knowledge of cultural and social requirements. A new factors proposed by the customize software quality models. The proposed cultural model has eight criterions namely: Language, Religion, social habits, publishing, custom, Ethics, and Law. We classified the new criterions factors into three main groups. The outcome of the proposed cultural model demonstrates that the eight criterions factors must be deemed to decrease the satisfactions of software failure and permanence variables. Finally we proposed a cultural language metric for measuring the satisfactions of software failure and permanence variables.

Comparative Study of Open Source Software Quality Models

Software Quality Models are a structured software product assessment method. With the rising fashion in software production, new applications are being designed and created daily. This inevitably gives an increase to the need to ensure that the product so constructed meets at least the intended expectations. The software engineering literature includes numerous quality models and each software quality model consisting of various quality attributes or factors or characteristics as some models call them. These quality attributes can be viewed from this feature's perspective to describe the software component or product's quality. A real challenge is to identify which Quality Models to use. The following quality models' content will be presented in this paper by the researcher: McCall's Quality Model, Dromey's Quality Model, Boehm's Quality Model, FURPS Quality Model, and ISO 9126.

Evaluation of information systems user interface by means of software quality`s models

The concept of information systems user interface quality has multidimensional content, which is difficult to isolate and measure due to the lack of a formalized model for assessing quality and terminological differences of quality indicators in standards. This work is aimed at finding solutions for using well-known software quality models in the interest of evaluating the user interface. The ratio of user interface assessment parameters to their presence in software quality assessment models is established; drawn regarding their evolutionary transformation are conclusions.

IMPORTANCE OF SOFTWARE QUALITY MODELS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

The purpose of this paper is to identify the importance quality in software engineering when the projects or products are developed. The degree to which a component, system or process meets specified requirements and/or user/customer needs and expectations is the quality. The totality of functionality and features of a software product that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs is software quality. Some even say that ‘quality’ cannot be defined and some say that it can be defined but only in a particular context. Some even state confidently that ‘quality is lack of bugs’. In this paper we discuss about the quality and the quality models.

Evaluating the Usability Maturity of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems

The enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is a complex and comprehensive software that integrates various enterprise functions and resources. Although ERP systems have been depicted as a solution in many organizations, there are many negative reports on ERP success, benefits, and effect on user performance. Previous research noted that there is a lack of knowledge and awareness of ERP systems and their overall value to ERP organizations. ERP systems have been widely studied during the past decade; yet they often fail to deliver the intended benefits originally expected. One notable reason for their failures is the lack of understanding in user requirements. There are many studies conducted to propose software quality models with their quality characteristics. However, there is currently no dedicated software quality model that can describe usability maturity and involve new features of ERP systems. This chapter proposes a framework for evaluating the usability maturity as a quality attribute of ERP systems.