chiral superfield
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yermek Aldabergenov ◽  
Auttakit Chatrabhuti ◽  
Hiroshi Isono

AbstractWe find new solutions to real cubic constraints on $$N=1$$ N = 1 chiral superfields transforming under global abelian symmetries. These solutions describe the low-energy dynamics of a goldstino interacting with an axion (both belonging to the same chiral superfield) with non-linearly realized supersymmetry. We show the relation between our model and the approach of Komargodski and Seiberg for describing goldstino-axion dynamics which uses orthogonal nilpotent superfields.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yermek Aldabergenov ◽  
Auttakit Chatrabhuti ◽  
Hiroshi Isono

AbstractWe construct new models of inflation and spontaneous supersymmetry breaking in de Sitter vacuum, with a single chiral superfield, where inflaton is the superpartner of the goldstino. Our approach is based on hyperbolic Kähler geometry, and a gauged (non-axionic) $$U(1)_R$$ U ( 1 ) R symmetry rotating the chiral scalar field by a phase. The $$U(1)_R$$ U ( 1 ) R gauge field combines with the angular component of the chiral scalar to form a massive vector, and single-field inflation is driven by the radial part of the scalar. We find that in a certain parameter range they can be approximated by simplest Starobinsky-like (E-model) $$\alpha $$ α -attractors, thus predicting $$n_s$$ n s and r within $$1\sigma $$ 1 σ CMB constraints. Supersymmetry (and R-symmetry) is broken at a high scale with the gravitino mass $$m_{3/2} > rsim 10^{14}$$ m 3 / 2 ≳ 10 14 GeV, and the fermionic sector also includes a heavy spin-1/2 field. In all the considered cases the inflaton is the lightest field of the model.


Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1818
Author(s):  
Yifan Cheng ◽  
Yan-Min Dai ◽  
Gaber Faisel ◽  
Otto C. W. Kong

This is a sequel to our earlier paper presenting a supersymmetric Nambu–Jona–Lasinio (NJL)-type model for a real superfield composite. The model in the simplest version has only a chiral superfield (multiplet), with a strong four-superfield interaction in the Kähler potential that induces a real two-superfield composite with vacuum condensate. The latter can have supersymmetry breaking parts, which we have shown to bear nontrivial solutions under a standard nonperturbative analysis for a Nambu–Jona–Lasinio-type model on a superfield setting. In this article, we generalize our earlier analysis by allowing a supersymmetric mass term for the chiral superfield, as well as possible θ2 components for the soft supersymmetry breaking part of the condensate. We present admissible nontrivial vacuum solutions and an analysis of the resulted low energy effective theory with components of the composite becoming dynamical. The determinant of the fermionic modes is shown to be zero, illustrating the presence of the expected Goldstino.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Chauhan ◽  
S. Kumar ◽  
A. Tripathi ◽  
R. P. Malik

Within the framework of Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) approach, we discuss mainly the fermionic (i.e., off-shell nilpotent) (anti-)BRST, (anti-)co-BRST, and some discrete dual symmetries of the appropriate Lagrangian densities for a two (1+1)-dimensional (2D) modified Proca (i.e., a massive Abelian 1-form) theory without any interaction with matter fields. One of the novel observations of our present investigation is the existence of some kinds of restrictions in the case of our present Stückelberg-modified version of the 2D Proca theory which is not like the standard Curci-Ferrari (CF) condition of a non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory. Some kinds of similarities and a few differences between them have been pointed out in our present investigation. To establish the sanctity of the above off-shell nilpotent (anti-)BRST and (anti-)co-BRST symmetries, we derive them by using our newly proposed (anti-)chiral superfield formalism where a few specific and appropriate sets of invariant quantities play a decisive role. We express the (anti-)BRST and (anti-)co-BRST conserved charges in terms of the superfields that are obtained after the applications of (anti-)BRST and (anti-)co-BRST invariant restrictions and prove their off-shell nilpotency and absolute anticommutativity properties, too. Finally, we make some comments on (i) the novelty of our restrictions/obstructions and (ii) the physics behind the negative kinetic term associated with the pseudoscalar field of our present theory.


Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifan Cheng ◽  
Yan-Min Dai ◽  
Gaber Faisel ◽  
Otto C. W. Kong

The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model is a classic theory for the strong dynamics of composite fields and symmetry breaking. Supersymmetric versions of the NJL-type models are certainly of interest too. Particularly, the case with a composite (Higgs) chiral superfield formed by two (quark) chiral superfields has received much attention. Here, we propose a prototype model with a four-chiral-superfield interaction, giving a real superfield composite. It has a spin-one composite vector field with properties being somewhat similar to a massive gauge boson of spontaneously broken gauge symmetry. As such, it is like the first supersymmetric analog to non-supersymmetric models with spin-one composites. The key formulation developed here is the picture of quantum effective action as a superfield functional with parameters like constant superfields, having explicit supersymmetric and Grassmann number dependent supersymmetry breaking parts. Following the standard non-perturbative analysis for NJL-type models, the gap equation analysis shows plausible signature of dynamical supersymmetry breaking which is worth more serious analysis. With an extra superfield model Lagrangian included, comparison between the models and their non-supersymmetric counterparts is discussed, illustrating the notion of supersymmetrization is nontrivial in the setting.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuo Kobayashi ◽  
Osamu Seto ◽  
Shintaro Takada ◽  
Takuya H Tatsuishi ◽  
Shohei Uemura ◽  
...  

Abstract We study Kähler moduli stabilization in type IIB superstring theory. We propose a new moduli stabilization mechanism by the supersymmetry breaking chiral superfield which is coupled to Kähler moduli in the Kähler potential. We also study its uplifting of the Large Volume Scenario (LVS). In both cases, the form of the superpotential is crucial for moduli stabilization. We confirm that our uplifting mechanism does not destabilize the vacuum of the LVS drastically.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (24) ◽  
pp. 1950131 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Chauhan ◽  
S. Kumar ◽  
R. P. Malik

We exploit the power and potential of the (anti-)chiral superfield approach (ACSA) to Becchi–Rouet–Stora–Tyutin (BRST) formalism to derive the nilpotent (anti-)BRST symmetry transformations for any arbitrary [Formula: see text]-dimensional interacting non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory where there is an [Formula: see text] gauge invariant coupling between the gauge field and the Dirac fields. We derive the conserved and nilpotent (anti-)BRST charges and establish their nilpotency and absolute anticommutativity properties within the framework of ACSA to BRST formalism. The clinching proof of the absolute anticommutativity property of the conserved and nilpotent (anti-)BRST charges is a novel result in view of the fact that we consider, in our endeavor, only the (anti-)chiral super expansions of the superfields that are defined on the [Formula: see text]-dimensional super-submanifolds of the general [Formula: see text]-dimensional supermanifold on which our [Formula: see text]-dimensional ordinary interacting non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory is generalized. To corroborate the novelty of the above result, we apply the ACSA to an [Formula: see text] supersymmetric (SUSY) quantum mechanical (QM) model of a harmonic oscillator and show that the nilpotent and conserved [Formula: see text] supercharges of this system do not absolutely anticommute.


2018 ◽  
Vol 394 ◽  
pp. 98-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shukla ◽  
N. Srinivas ◽  
R.P. Malik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document