Efficacy of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin for the Treatment of Secondary Failure of Platelet Recovery After Allogeneic HSCT

Secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) is a life-threatening complication that may affect up to 20% of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), we retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who received continuous rhTPO for the treatment of SFPR. Overall response and complete response were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients and 10 (34.5%) patients, at a median time of 21.5 days (range, 3-41 days) and 39.5 days (range, 7-53 days) after initiation of rhTPO treatment, respectively. Among the responders, the probability of keeping overall response and complete response at 1 year after response was 77.3% and 80.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher CD34+ cells (≥3 × 106/kg) infused during HSCT (HR: 7.22, 95% CI: 1.53-34.04, P = 0.01) and decreased ferritin after rhTPO treatment (HR: 6.16, 95% CI: 1.18-32.15, P = 0.03) were indicated to associate with complete response to rhTPO. Importantly, rhTPO was well tolerated in all patients without side effects urging withdrawal and clinical intervention. The results of this study suggest that rhTPO may be a safe and effective treatment for SFPR.

Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin Accelerates the Recovery of Platelet in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Proof-of-Concept Study

AimThe effect of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) is largely unknown in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS). This study aimed at investigating the safety and efficacy of rhTPO in patients with LR-MDS.MethodsLR-MDS patients receiving stanozolol (2 mg, t.i.d.) and supportive care alone (non-rhTPO) or additional rhTPO were enrolled in this study prospectively. rhTPO was given at 15,000 U (q.d.) for 7 days/month for at least 3 months. Patients stopped rhTPO if the platelet count was higher than 50 × 109/L or had no effects after 3 months of treatment. The overall response (OR), complete response (CR), platelet response, side effects, clone evolution, and clinical outcome were evaluated.ResultThirty-five patients were enrolled: 20 (57.1%) patients in the rhTPO group and 15 (42.9%) patients in the non-rhTPO group. The demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. Platelet response was higher at 1 and 2 months as compared with that in the non-rhTPO group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, the rhTPO group had a shorter time to achieve a platelet transfusion-free state compared with the non-rhTPO group (p = 0.034). Hematologic response was higher at 1 and 2 months compared with that in the non-rhTPO group (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the overall response or complete response at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months between the two groups. One patient in the rhTPO group evolved into higher-risk MDS at 9 months. No significant difference in disease progression, infection, gastrointestinal disorders, or drug-related liver/renal injuries was found between the two groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionAdding short-term rhTPO can accelerate the early platelet response and decrease platelet transfusion, with no obvious side effects.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04324060?cond=NCT04324060&draw=2, identifier NCT04324060

A Real-World Observation of Eltrombopag and Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in Lymphoma Patients With Chemotherapy Induced Thrombocytopenia

This real-world, observational study aimed to assess and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of eltrombopag with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in the treatment of chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in patients with lymphoma. One hundred and fifty-three patients who experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy for lymphoma were enrolled, 51 of which were treated with eltrombopag, 50 with rhTPO, and 52 patients with no drug treatment were served as the control group. The lowest platelet level and mean platelet counts at Day 5, Day 7, and Day 10 were significantly higher in both the eltrombopag group (P=.041,.003,.000,.000) and rhTPO group (P=.005,.005,.000,.000) than the control, but there was no difference between treatment with eltrombopag and rhTPO. Similarly, days required for the recovery of platelet counts to ≥50×109/L and ≥75×109/L were not different between the two treatment groups but significantly higher than the control group (P <.05). Rates of bleeding and platelet transfusion were all significantly reduced in patients treated with eltrombopag (P=.031,.032) or rhTPO (P=.017,.009) when compared to the control. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 7 (13.7%) and 6 (12.0%) patients in the eltrombopag and rhTPO groups, respectively, all being mild and transient in nature. In conclusion, both eltrombopag and rhTPO were effective and safe in the treatment of thrombocytopenia after chemotherapy for lymphoma.