transscleral suture fixation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Vitaly V. Potyomkin ◽  
Sergey Yu. Astakhov ◽  
Elena V. Goltsman ◽  
Xiaoyuan Wang ◽  
Yulduz Sh. Nizametdinova

BACKGROUND:Intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation is a rare but serious complication of surgical treatment of patients with cataract. Among the factors contributing to its development, the main ones are pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), high axial myopia, chronic uveitis, history of eye injury and age. There is no universal IOL dislocation correction technique. PURPOSE:To evaluate the impact on corneal endothelium of two different methods of IOL dislocation correction: IOL repositioning with transscleral suture fixation or IOL exchange to iris-claw one. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Within the study, 78 patients were examined and operated. All patients were divided into two groups: in the first group, IOL was repositioned with transscleral suture fixation, and in the second group IOL was exchanged to iris-claw IOL. Groups were equal by gender and age. Key estimated indicators were endothelial cell density and coefficient of variation reflecting the degree of polymegatism. RESULTS:Endothelial cell density was significantly lower both before surgery and at any term after it, in the group with IOL exchange, and coefficient of variation was significantly higher in the group with IOL exchange throughout this study. CONCLUSION:The choice of technique for IOL dislocation correction is the basis of success in surgical treatment. Certain preoperative examination data should be definitely considered, including the degree of dislocation, IOL type, IOP level, endothelial cell density and presence of concomitant ocular conditions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3868
Author(s):  
Young In Shin ◽  
Un Chul Park

We compared the surgical outcomes and complications of refixation vs. exchange of dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients who underwent transscleral suture fixation combined with pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of IOL dislocation. A total of 83 eyes (n = 83 patients) with postoperative follow-up of ≥6 months were evaluated: 40 received refixation of dislocated IOL (refixation group) while 43 received IOL exchange (exchange group) treatment. Treatment outcomes, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, corneal cylinder, intraocular pressure (IOP), central macular thickness (CMT), and corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), and postoperative complications were retrospectively reviewed. BCVA improvement at 6 months after surgery was comparable between the groups. Postoperative decrease in corneal ECD was significantly greater in the exchange group than in the refixation group, but no significant differences were found in spherical equivalent, corneal cylinder, IOP, or CMT changes. The exchange group experienced significantly more frequent postoperative vitreoretinal complications, such as retinal detachment, choroidal effusion, cystoid macular edema, and secondary epiretinal membrane, than the refixation group. Without any reason to extract the dislocated IOL, reuse of the dislocated IOL would be a better surgical option for transscleral suture fixation to protect corneal endothelial cells and prevent postoperative vitreoretinal complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 2617-2625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan J. Lang ◽  
Sonja Heinzelmann ◽  
Daniel Böhringer ◽  
Thomas Reinhard ◽  
Philip Maier

Abstract Purpose Recently, intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) has evolved in the field of ophthalmic surgery. So far, the use of iOCT was mainly focused to lamellar keratoplasty, especially deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). The aim of this study was to report our experiences with iOCT to introduce new possibilities of this application. Methods We used iOCT in 18 patients who underwent the following surgeries: DALK, DMEK, penetrating keratoplasty, autologous limbal transplantation, transscleral suture fixation of a posterior chamber lens, pannus removal on corneal surface and newborn investigation in Peters’ anomaly. We obtained qualitative video data for all procedures. Results With the iOCT, the cannula placement during DALK preparation of the recipient cornea and bubble formation could be visualized to improve the success rate of the big bubble injection. In DMEK, the iOCT enables the visualization of Descemet’s membrane removal in the recipient and graft orientation as well as better control of graft attachment. The iOCT enables intraoperative visualization of the graft–host interface during penetrating keratoplasty. During autologous limbal transplantation, transscleral suture fixation of a posterior chamber lens and removal of corneal surface pannus the iOCT is capable of showing the thickness of lamellar preparations to avoid penetrations and to save healthy recipient’s tissue. Conclusion The iOCT is a helpful device for intraoperative anterior segment imaging not only for DALK and DMEK. It is also beneficial in penetrating keratoplasty and every other form of lamellar preparation during corneoscleral surgery.


2018 ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
G.V. Muraveva ◽  
◽  
D.V. Sycheva ◽  
I.A. Frolychev ◽  
N.A. Pozdeyeva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document