An Exceptional Case of Simultaneous double ileoileal Intussusception Secondary to Burkitt’s Lymphoma

Intussusception is the telescoping or invagination of one segment of the bowel into its adjacent portion. It is common among children however it’s rare in adults, being seen in approximately only 5% of cases. In adults, it is the underlying cause of about 5% of bowel obstructions. More than half of these intussusceptions in adults are secondary to a neoplasm. Burkitt’s lymphoma is an uncommon cause of intussusception, in adults, less than 20 cases have been reported in the literature. Double intussusceptions due to Burkitt’s lymphoma are extremely rare. We present a case of a 20-year-old woman who presented symptoms of intestinal obstruction and was diagnosed with double ileoileal intussusception at Abdominal computed tomography and laparotomy exploration. The pathology of the lead points turned out to be Burkitt’s lymphoma. This case details a rare cause of intussusception secondary to Burkitt’s lymphoma. In infants, this is often treated with air enema reduction, but in adult populations, intussusceptions are normally associated with a lead point, therefore surgical management is essential. Hereby we present to you a second reported case in the literature of adult double intussusception due to Burkitt’s lymphoma. This report contains interesting diagnostic imaging, operative details, and specimen photographs.

Clinical Characteristics of Pediatric Intussusception And Predictors of Surgery And Bowel Resection In Affected Patients

Surgery is required for the treatment of intussusception when enema reduction is unsuccessful, or when the patient develops peritonitis, bowel perforation, or intestinal damage. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and laboratory parameters that may be used to predict the need for bowel resection in children with intussusception. This observational retrospective study included children who were admitted to the pediatric emergency room with intussusception. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with bowel resection. In total, 584 children with intussusception were admitted to the pediatric emergency room; 129 of these children underwent surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed the following independent predictors of surgery for intussusception: abdominal pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.372; p = 0.013), bloody stool (OR = 3.553; p = 0.044), and hyponatremia (OR = 4.12; 95% p = 0.003). Symptoms for at least 2 days before surgery (OR = 6.863; p = 0.009), long intussusception (OR = 5.088; p = 0.014), pathological lead point (OR = 6.926; p = 0.003), and intensive care unit admission (OR = 11.777; p = 0.001) were factors independently associated with bowel resection. These findings can be used to identify patients at high risk of needing surgery and bowel resection.

The diagnosis and treatment of retrograde intussusception: a single-centre experience

Background/Purpose To investigate the clinical manifestations, treatments of retrograde intussusception and summarize the experience. Methods Children with retrograde intussusception treated in our hospital from January 2011 to January 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Demographics, clinical manifestations, preoperative colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) findings, findings during surgery and follow-up results were collected. Results A total of 4719 cases of intussusception were treated in our department, including 12 cases of retrograde intussusception (0.25%). There were 8 males and 4 females.The age ranged from 4.1 to 14.3 months, with an average of (8.3 ± 2.8) months.; The weight ranged from 5.5 to 12.6 kg, with an average of (9.4 ± 2.3) kg; The onset time ranged from 6 to 15 h, with an average of (10.0 ± 2.4) h. All the children received CDU examination before surgery, and in one case, the possibility of 2 intussusception masses was considered. Emergency surgical exploration was performed after the failure of air enema reduction. During the operation, multiple types of intussusception were found (coincidence of anterograde and retrograde intussusception). The pattern of anterograde intussusception was all ileo-ileo-colic variety and the retrograde intussusception was proximal sigmoid colon into descending colon. All the children were successfully reduced by manual reduction without intestinal necrosis or intestinal malformation. All children were discharged 6–7 days after surgery, and had no recurrence after 3–6 months of follow-up. Conclusions Retrograde intussusception is easily misdiagnosed before surgery. During air enema, if the intussusception mass was fixed and did not move with increasing pressure, we should be aware of the possibility of retrograde intussusception, and the enema pressure should not be too large to avoid intestinal perforation. If the intraoperative position of the intussusception mass was not consistent with that of the preoperative enema, it was recommended to use bimanual examination to explore whether there was still a mass in the abdominal cavity to avoid misdiagnosis.

The efficacy of delayed, repeated reduction enema in management of intussusception

Background Management of intussusception varies according to the case, time of presentation, cause, and symptoms. In this study, we focus on describing the demographic and sonographic characteristics of children with intussusception with failed initial enema reduction who were managed by delayed repeated enema attempts and identify predictors associated with successful repeated reduction. Results This study was conducted in the period from December 2018 to April 2020 at university hospitals (pediatric surgery unit). This study included 40 patients with intussusceptions; 27 are males, and 13 of them are females. Their ages ranged from 5 months to 3 years old. Patients in this study had failed initial enema reduction attempts under sonographic guidance and had subsequent delayed (≥ 2 h from the initial attempt) repeated enemas made up the study population. Of the 40 patients, 34 patients (85%) were successfully reduced, and 6 patients (15%) failed reduction and required surgical intervention. There were no deaths, perforation, or resection of gangrenous bowel. Two cases showed recurrences, but required no surgical intervention. It is also noted that early presentation (< 12 h), stable, non-complicated, and with little or no bloody diarrhea are predictors of successful DRE. Conclusion Delayed repeated enema in the treatment of intussusception is a viable option in patients with unsuccessful initial enema reduction provided that early presentation, stable vitals, and no signs of perforation or peritonitis are present.

Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction versus fluoroscopy-guided air reduction for pediatric intussusception: a multi-center, prospective, cohort study

Background Intussusception is the most common abdominal emergency in children. The first line treatment of uncomplicated pediatric intussusception is enema reduction. Until now, there have been no multi-center studies comparing the effectiveness and safety of UGHR and FGAR in the treatment of pediatric intussusception. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the two most commonly used enema methods of pediatric intussusception: ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction (UGHR) and fluoroscopy-guided air reduction (FGAR). Methods From November 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018, we conducted a multi-center, prospective, cohort study. Children diagnosed with intussusception in four large Children’s Medical Centers in China were divided into UGHR and FGAR groups. Stratified analysis and subgroup analysis were used for further comparison. The success and recurrence rates were used to evaluate the effectiveness of enema reduction. The perforation rate was used to evaluate the safety of enema reduction. Results A total of 2124 cases met the inclusion criteria (UGHR group: 1119 cases; FGAR group: 1005 cases). The success and recurrence rates in the UGHR group were higher than in the FGAR group (95.80%, 9.28% vs. 93.13%, 10.65%) (P < 0.05, P > 0.05), respectively. The perforation rate in the UGHR group was 0.36% compared with 0.30% in the FGAR group (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed the success rates in the UGHR group were higher than in the FGAR group of patients with onset time between 12 and 24 h (95.56% vs. 90.57%) (P < 0.05). Of patients aged 4 to 24 months, the success rates in the UGHR group were also higher than in the FGAR group (95.77% vs. 91.60%) (P < 0.05). Stratified analysis showed the success rates in the UGHR group were higher than in the FGAR group in patients with the symptom of bloody stool (91.91% vs 85.38%) (P < 0.05). Conclusions UGHR and FGAR are safe, nonsurgical treatment methods for acute pediatric intussusception. UGHR is superior to FGAR, no radiation risk, its success rate is higher, without a difference in perforation rate, especially for patients aged 4–24 months. Level of evidence Level II.