foam thickness
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

30
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Mark Jesunathadas ◽  
Nadine Lippa ◽  
Shayne York ◽  
David E. Krzeminski ◽  
Scott G. Piland ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Qin ◽  
Zhiguo Xu ◽  
Xiaofei Ma

Abstract Based on the newly developed geometrical model of open-cell metal foam, pool boiling heat transfer in open-cell metal foam, considering thermal responses of foam skeletons, is investigated by the phase-change lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). Pool boiling patterns are obtained at different heat fluxes. The effects of pore density and foam thickness on bubble dynamics and pool boiling heat transfer are revealed. The results show that “bubble entrainment” promotes fluid mixing and bubble sliding inside metal foam. Based on force analysis, the sliding bubble is pinned on the heating surface and cannot lift off completely at high heat flux due to the increasing surface tension force. Pool boiling heat transfer coefficient decreases with increasing pore density and foam thickness due to high bubble escaping resistance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 115873
Author(s):  
Jiuling Yang ◽  
Guillermo Rein ◽  
Haixiang Chen ◽  
Mauro Zammarano

Author(s):  
Leonardo Lachi Manetti ◽  
Ana Sofia Oliveira Henriques Moita ◽  
Reinaldo Rodrigues de Souza ◽  
Elaine Maria Cardoso

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Singh ◽  
Karthik Nithyanandam ◽  
Mingyang Zhang ◽  
Roop L. Mahajan

Abstract High-porosity metal foam (MF) is a popular option for high-performance heat exchangers as it offers significantly higher heat transfer participation area per unit volume compared to other convection enhancement cooling methods. Further, metal foams provide highly tortuous flow paths resulting in thermal dispersion assisted by enhanced mixing. This paper presents experimental and numerical studies and the detailed underlying physics of jet array impingement onto high-porosity (ε∼0.95) thin aluminum foams. The jet and foam configurations were designed for the maximum utilization of the foam area for heat transfer and reduced penalty on the pumping power requirement. Three different pore density foams were tested with three different array-jet impingement configurations. The minimum possible thickness for each pore density was tested, viz., 5 pores-per-inch (PPI): 19 mm, 10 PPI: 12.7 mm, and 20 PPI: 6.35 mm. The baseline case for these foam-based jet impingement configurations was the corresponding configuration of orthogonal jet impingement onto a smooth heated surface, where the distance between the jet-issuing plane and the heated surface was maintained at the foam thickness level. In general, thinner foams facilitated greater jet penetration and increased foam volume usage, resulting in higher heat transfer rates for a given pore density, especially when combined with jet configurations with larger open areas. Finally, we evaluated the thermal hydraulic performance for different foam configurations and the optimum value of a given PPI was found to be at an intermediate rather than the lowest foam thickness.


Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3989
Author(s):  
Kainan Qi ◽  
Liangsheng Li ◽  
Jianxun Su ◽  
Yongqiang Liu ◽  
Junwen Chen

An ultrathin tunable absorber for the ultrahigh frequency (UHF) band is presented in this paper. The absorber is a single-layer structure based on the topology of a Salisbury screen, in which the conventional resistive layer is replaced by an active frequency-selective surface (AFSS) loaded with resistors and varactors. The reflectivity response of the absorber can be controlled by adjusting the reverse bias voltage for the varactors, which is verified by both simulated and measured results. The experimental results show that the reflectivity response of the absorber can be modulated below −10 dB over a frequency band ranging from 415 to 822 MHz. The total thickness of the absorber, 10 mm, is equivalent to only λ/72 of the lower limit frequency. The absorbing mechanism for the designed absorber is illustrated by simulating the volume loss density distributions. A detailed analysis is also carried out on the basis of these parameters, such as the AFSS shape, resistor, thickness of the foam, thickness and permittivity of the dielectric substrate, and incident angles, which contribute to the reflectivity of the AFSS absorber.


Author(s):  
Prashant Singh ◽  
Mingyang Zhang ◽  
Roop L. Mahajan

Abstract High porosity metal foam is a popular option for high performance heat exchangers as it offers significantly larger area per unit volume for heat dissipation as compared to other cooling techniques by convection. Further, metal foams provide highly tortuous flow paths resulting in thermal dispersion assisted by enhanced mixing. This paper reports an experimental study on jet array impingement onto high-porosity (ε∼0.95) thin aluminum foams. Our goal was to study the effect of foam thickness on convective transport and determine the optimum combination of foam thickness and pore density for maximum gain in thermal-hydraulic performance. To this end, three different pore-density foams (5, 10 and 20 pores per inch, ppi) were tested with three different jet array (5 × 5) impingement configurations (x/dj = 2,3 and 5), where “x” is the distance between any two adjacent jets and “dj” is the jet diameter. For the three pore densities selected, six values of foam thickness — 6.35 mm, 12.7 mm and 19.05 mm for the 20 ppi foam, 12.7 mm and 19.05 mm for the 10 ppi foam, and 12.7 mm for the 5 ppi foam — were deployed. The minimum thickness for each of the ppi value was dictated by the vendor’s manufacturing constraint. The thermal performance of these foams was compared against the orthogonal jet impingement onto a smooth heated surface, for which the distance between the jet exit plane and the heated surface was maintained at the foam thickness level. The data indicates that for a given pore density, thin foams have higher heat transfer rates compared to those for thicker foams, especially with jet configurations with larger open area ratios. The gain is due to the increased jet penetration and foam volume usage in thin foams compared to those for thick foams. Of the different pore density and foam thickness combinations, a 12.70 mm/20 ppi combination was found to have the highest thermal hydraulic performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document