central nervous system injury
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

238
(FIVE YEARS 35)

H-INDEX

42
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Fabiola Mendez Elizondo ◽  
José Arturo Valdez Ramírez ◽  
Gustavo Barraza Aguirre ◽  
Paulette Mariette Dautt Medina ◽  
Jorge Berlanga Estens

2021 ◽  
pp. 113829
Author(s):  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Yundan Liang ◽  
Xiaolei Luo ◽  
Yuqing Liu ◽  
Xiaoli Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
lei wang ◽  
zhao jing ◽  
yi zhang

Introductionobserve the polarization of microglia in response to heat-induced early nerve injury and to explore its possible mechanism of action.Material and methods18 dogs were divided into control (group A) and experimental groups (group B, C and D) ,Western blot analysis was used to detect the expression of microglia-specific markers CD45, iNOS, Arginase, and CD206 in normal and heat-damaged brain tissues at different time points (1 h, 6 h, 24 h).ResultsCD45 and iNOS were detected in group A. The two protein markers in group B were significantly higher than those in group A (P < 0.05), and in group C were still higher than those in group A (P < 0.05). Arginase and CD206 were also detected in group A. they in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05), and in group C were even higher than those in group A (P < 0.05). Immunofluorescence co-localization of CD45 and Arginase showed significantly increased fluorescence density at 6 h and 24 h after thermal injury (P < 0.001).ConclusionsAfter heat-induced disease, microglia were found active in the brain tissues of dogs. The microglia activated in the early 1-6 h of central nervous system injury were mainly the M1 type, which were then converted to the M2 type after 6 h. The 24 h M2 type was dominant. The relationship between M1/M2 polarization trends and early brain injury in heat-induced disease may be a key to understanding central nervous system injury in heat-induced disease.


Author(s):  
Hiroshi Tsujioka ◽  
Toshihide Yamashita

Abstract Central nervous system injury often causes lifelong impairment of neural function, because the regenerative ability of axons is limited, making a sharp contrast to the successful regeneration that is seen in the peripheral nervous system. Nevertheless, partial functional recovery is observed, because axonal branches of damaged or undamaged neurons sprout and form novel relaying circuits. Using a lot of animal models such as the spinal cord injury model or the optic nerve injury model, previous studies have identified many factors that promote or inhibit axonal regeneration or sprouting. Molecules in the myelin such as myelin-associated glycoprotein, Nogo-A or oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein, or molecules found in the glial scar such as chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, activate Ras homolog A (RhoA) signaling, which leads to the collapse of the growth cone and inhibit axonal regeneration. By contrast, axonal regeneration programs can be activated by many molecules such as regeneration-associated transcription factors, cyclic AMP, neurotrophic factors, growth factors, mechanistic target of rapamycin or immune-related molecules. Axonal sprouting and axonal regeneration largely share these mechanisms. For functional recovery, appropriate pruning or suppressing of aberrant sprouting are also important. In contrast to adults, neonates show much higher sprouting ability. Specific cell types, various mouse strains and different species show higher regenerative ability. Studies focusing on these models also identified a lot of molecules that affect the regenerative ability. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms of neural circuit repair will lead to the development of better therapeutic approaches for central nervous system injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document