galileo e5
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhan Khan ◽  
Aisha Batool

This paper presents an efficient and unique method to learn the complex receiver structure of Galileo E5 AltBOC (Alternative Binary Offset Carrier). The software application is designed in Matlab to present each step involved in the design of software receiver of Galileo E5 signal. This software application contains the fundamental concepts of the Galileo E5 signal in the form of signal acquisition, signal tracking, extraction of the navigation data, power spectral density (PSD) of the AltBOC (15, 10), Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the E5a and E5b signal and implementation of the subcarrier used for the AltBOC (15,10). This paper also presents the extraction of navigation data by a novel based approach using the prompt channel of carrier tracking from the code loop discriminator.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 3973
Author(s):  
Artem M. Padokhin ◽  
Anna A. Mylnikova ◽  
Yury V. Yasyukevich ◽  
Yury V. Morozov ◽  
Gregory A. Kurbatov ◽  
...  

Global navigation satellite system signals are known to be an efficient tool to monitor the Earth ionosphere. We suggest Galileo E5 AltBOC phase and pseudorange observables— a single-frequency combination—to estimate the ionospheric total electron content (TEC). We performed a one-month campaign in September 2020 to compare the noise level for different TEC estimations based on single-frequency and dual-frequency data. Unlike GPS, GLONASS, or Galileo E5a and E5b single-frequency TEC estimations (involving signals with binary and quadrature phase-shift keying, such as BPSK and QPSK, or binary offset carrier (BOC) modulation), an extra wideband Galileo E5 AltBOC signal provided the smallest noise level, comparable to that of dual-frequency GPS. For elevation higher than 60 degrees, the 100-sec root-mean-square (RMS) of TEC, an estimated TEC noise proxy, was as follows for different signals: ~0.05 TECU for Galileo E5 AltBOC, 0.09 TECU for GPS L5, ~0.1TECU for Galileo E5a/E5b BPSK, and 0.85 TECU for Galileo E1 CBOC. Dual-frequency phase combinations provided RMS values of 0.03 TECU for Galileo E1/E5, 0.03 and 0.07 TECU for GPS L1/L2 and L1/L5. At low elevations, E5 AltBOC provided at least twice less single-frequency TEC noise as compared with data obtained from E5a or E5b. The short dataset of our study could limit the obtained estimates; however, we expect that the AltBOC single-frequency TEC will still surpass the BPSK analogue in noise parameters when the solar cycle evolves and geomagnetic activity increases. Therefore, AltBOC signals could advance geoscience.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2295
Author(s):  
Dominik Prochniewicz ◽  
Maciej Grzymala

Multipath is one of the major source of errors in precise Global Navigation Satellite System positioning. With the emergence of new navigation systems, such as Galileo, upgraded signals are progressively being used and are expected to provide greater resistance to the effects of multipath compared to legacy Global Positioning System (GPS) signals. The high quality of Galileo observations along with recent development of the Galileo space segment can therefore offer significant advantages to Galileo users in terms of the accuracy and reliability of positioning. The aim of this paper is to verify this hypothesis. The multipath impact was determined both for code and phase measurements as well as for positioning results. The code multipath error was determined using the Code-Minus-Carrier combination. The influence of multipath on phase observations and positioning error was determined using measurements on a very short baseline. In addition, the multipath was classified into two different types: specular and diffuse, using wavelet transform. The results confirm that the Galileo code observations are more resistant to the multipath effect than GPS observations. Among all of the observations examined, the lowest values of code multipath errors were recorded for the Galileo E5 signal. However, no advantage of Galileo over GPS was observed for phase observations and for the analysis of positioning results.


Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Das ◽  
Lorenzo Ortega ◽  
Jordi Vilà-Valls ◽  
François Vincent ◽  
Eric Chaumette ◽  
...  

This contribution analyzes the fundamental performance limits of traditional two-step Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver architectures, which are directly linked to the achievable time-delay estimation performance. In turn, this is related to the GNSS baseband signal resolution, i.e., bandwidth, modulation, autocorrelation function, and the receiver sampling rate. To provide a comprehensive analysis of standard point positioning techniques, we consider the different GPS and Galileo signals available, as well as the signal combinations arising in the so-called GNSS meta-signal paradigm. The goal is to determine: (i) the ultimate achievable performance of GNSS code-based positioning systems; and (ii) whether we can obtain a GNSS code-only precise positioning solution and under which conditions. In this article, we provide clear answers to such fundamental questions, leveraging on the analysis of the Cramér–Rao bound (CRB) and the corresponding Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE). To determine such performance limits, we assume no external ionospheric, tropospheric, orbital, clock, or multipath-induced errors. The time-delay CRB and the corresponding MLE are obtained for the GPS L1 C/A, L1C, and L5 signals; the Galileo E1 OS, E6B, E5b-I, and E5 signals; and the Galileo E5b-E6 and E5a-E6 meta-signals. The results show that AltBOC-type signals (Galileo E5 and meta-signals) can be used for code-based precise positioning, being a promising real-time alternative to carrier phase-based techniques.


2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 555-574
Author(s):  
Jérôme Leclère ◽  
René Landry

The acquisition of modern Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals may be difficult due to the presence of a secondary code. Indeed, short coherent integration times should be used without non-coherent integration, which implies a low sensitivity; or long coherent integration times should be used, requiring synchronisation with the secondary code and thus a full correlation, which implies a significant computational burden, especially for signals with long secondary codes such as the Galileo E5 signal. A third option that lies between the previous two is to perform a partial correlation using less than one secondary code period as input, however this is less efficient in terms of complexity than using an entire secondary code period, and the code's autocorrelation properties are completely changed. The authors recently proposed a method based on combining secondary code correlations, allowing the use of intermediate coherent integration times with the possibility to do non-coherent integrations, and the method was successfully applied to the Global Positioning System (GPS) L5 signal. This paper studies the application of the method to the Galileo E5 signal, compares it with the partial correlation method, and discusses the case where less than one secondary code period is used as an input


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1640-1644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Ma ◽  
Michail Antoniou ◽  
Mikhail Cherniakov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document