ocular artifacts
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

120
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel A. Lyakhov ◽  
Mariya R. Kialdze ◽  
Dmitrii I. Kaplun ◽  
Alexander S. Voznesensky


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 425-433
Author(s):  
B. Krishna Kumar

Electroencephalogram (EEG) is basically a standard method for investigating the brain’s electrical action in diverse psychological and pathological states. Investigation of Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is a tough task due to the occurrence of different artifacts such as Ocular Artifacts (OA) and Electromyogram. By and large EEG signals falls in the range of DC to 60 Hz and amplitude of 1-5 µv. Ocular artifacts do have the similar statistical properties of EEG signals, often interfere with EEG signal, thereby making the analysis of EEG signals more complex[1]. In this research paper, Principal Component Analysis is employed in denoising the EEG signals. This paper explains up to what level the scaling of principal components have to be done. This paper explains the number of levels of scaling the principal components to get the high quality EEG signal. The work has been carried out on different data sets and later estimated the SNR.



2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
David O. Nahmias ◽  
Kimberly L. Kontson

With prevalence of electrophysiological data collected outside of the laboratory from portable, non-invasive modalities growing at a rapid rate, the quality of these recorded data, if not adequate, could affect the effectiveness of medical devices that depend of them. In this work, we propose novel methods to evaluate electrophysiological signal quality to determine how much of the data represents the physiological source of interest. Data driven models are investigated through Bayesian decision and deep learning-based methods to score unimodal (signal and noise recorded on same device) and multimodal (signal and noise each recorded from different devices) data, respectively. We validate these methods and models on three electroencephalography (EEG) data sets (N = 60 subjects) to score EEG quality based on the presence of ocular artifacts with our unimodal method and motion artifacts with our multimodal method. Further, we apply our unimodal source method to compare the performance of two different artifact removal algorithms. Our results show we are able to effectively score EEG data using both methods and apply our method to evaluate the performance of other artifact removal algorithms that target ocular artifacts. Methods developed and validated here can be used to assess data quality and evaluate the effectiveness of certain noise-reduction algorithms.



Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Joanna Górecka ◽  
Andrzej Biedka

The occurrence of physiological artifacts generated by eye movements in electrical brain activity (electroencephalography, EEG) is a well-known problem in clinical practice. In order to increase the accuracy of the detection of eye movements during EEG examination, additional electrooculogram channels (electrooculography, EOG) with a standard PC keyboard are used. The EOG technique is not always comfortable for patients. Another issue is that the use of EOG channels in the EEG examination leads to the prolongation of time required for patient preparation. To solve these problems, we developed a new peripheral device suitable for the indication of common ocular artifacts in EEG. The obtained differences between the recommended methods (i.e., EOG, PC keyboard) and our new device have been presented using RMSE (root mean square error). The presented equipment can be used either during EEG examination or after registration of EEG signals in order to indicate the ocular artifacts. Furthermore, this device is compatible with the EEG software used in clinical practice.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document