segmental ureterectomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S66
Author(s):  
E. Palagonia ◽  
C. Giulioni ◽  
S. Scarcella ◽  
L. Dell’Atti ◽  
G. Milanese ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1449-1449
Author(s):  
M. Hajri ◽  
W. Ferjaoui ◽  
S. Baccouche ◽  
L. Gharbi ◽  
H. Mestiri ◽  
...  

A 55-year-old woman, with no medical history, presented with acute right flank pain. She had no history of other urinary complaints. On physical examination, the patient was tachycardic (pulse rate: 100bpm) and tachypneic (respiratory rate: 24 breaths/min), blood pressure was11/6 and temperature was 37.4°. The abdominal examination showed severe tenderness in the right flank and the right iliac fossa. All blood reports were normal, including C-reactive protein, cell blood count and serum creatinine. Computed Tomography of the abdomen revealed a right hydronephrosis with delayed phase contrast leak and a retroperitoneal mass of 48x36mm of unknown nature, enhanced after contrast injection, which seemed to compress the right ureter causing the forniceal rupture. A double J ureteral stent was insterted into the right renal cavities with favorable evolution and immediate resolution of pain. Surgical management of the mass was scheduled one month later after the inflammatory phase and resorption of the urinoma. The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperatively, a tissular retroperitoneal mass of 4 cm was discovered which invadedthe right proximal ureter as well asthe duodenum and the ileocecal pedicle (Figure 1). Resection of the tumor was performed as well as a segmental ureterectomy, right colectomy, and resection of a small portion of the duodenum. Both ureteric and colic anastomosis were then performed along with duodenal suture. The post operative course was uneventful.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjie Gao ◽  
Jiawei Chen ◽  
Guowei Li ◽  
Xinhai Cui ◽  
Fengyin Sun

Objective: To investigate surgical techniques and challenges of laparoscopic in treating pediatric ureteral polyps under laparoscopy.Methods: The clinical data of 7 of pediatric ureteral polyps patients who were admitted to the hospital from July 2015 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 6 males and 1 female from 7.7 to 13.9 years old at the mean age of 10.4. Before surgery, all children performed urinary B ultrasound, magnetic resonance urography (MRU), and renal radionuclide scanning. Six cases were observed on the left lateral and 1 on the right. The lesions of 5 cases were located at the ureteropelvic junction, 1 in the upper ureter and 1 in the middle ureter. The polyps were treated intraoperatively by the resecting of the lesion segment and simple polypectomy to retain the attached part of the original diseased segment of the ureter. All surgeries were performed under laparoscopy and B-ultrasound was performed during follow up after surgery.Results: All 7 surgeries were performed successfully under the laparoscope. The surgery time was 80–110 min, and the average surgery time was 97.5 min. The intraoperative bleeding was 10–25 ml and the average postoperative hospital stay was 6 d. Postoperative hematuria occurred in 1 case. Neither urinary leakage nor urinary tract infection was reported post surgery. Preoperative affected pyelectasis of all patients was 2.0–3.7 cm. Three months postoperatively, the affected pyelectasis was measured at 1.2–3.0 cm. No recurrence of polyps was reported after surgery. During the follow-up to April 2020, there was no significant change in the kidney size of all patients, and hydronephrosis was alleviated compared with that before surgery.Conclusions: Laparoscopy is a safe, effective and minimally invasive surgical technique for pediatric multiple ureteral polyps. The surgery plan was designed according to the location and size of polyps, including segmental ureterectomy of polyps + pyeloureterostomy, segmental ureterectomy of polyps + ureter - ureteral anastomosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. S1110
Author(s):  
M. Paciotti ◽  
K. Yim ◽  
D. Nguyen ◽  
M. Marchese ◽  
L. Häuser ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Heon Kim ◽  
Chung Un Lee ◽  
Minyong Kang ◽  
Hwang Gyun Jeon ◽  
Byong Chang Jeong ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
Erika Palagonia ◽  
Simone Scarcella ◽  
Lucio Dell'Atti ◽  
Giulio Milanese ◽  
Peter Schatteman ◽  
...  

Introduction: According to the Urology guidelines, in selected cases of distal upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) segmental ureterectomy (SU) can be offered. There is no consensus in the surgical technique of preference. Robot-assisted SU could be an option to overcome all the limitations of open and laparoscopic techniques. We describe our first experience of robot assisted SU with psoas hitch ureteral reimplantation (RAPHUR). Materials and methods: 11 patients underwent RAPHUR for distal UTUC between 2013 and 2017 in a single centre. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Conventional imaging was performed after 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year from surgery as follow up protocol. We retrospectively evaluated the technical feasibility, oncological and functional outcomes. Results: Median age was 71 years (57-91). The median length of the ureteral defect was 23 mm (10-40). Median preoperative creatinine level was 1.22 mg/dl (0.7-1.85) and median eGFR was 57.5 ml/min/1.73m2 (31-80). Five (45.5%) patients were symptomatic and 7 (63.6%) had hydronephrosis. Median operative time was 185 min (120-240), with a median blood loss of 100 ml (50-300). No case required conversion to open surgery. Overall, only 1 (9%) patient developed Clavien Dindo ≥ 3 postoperative complications. Average hospital stay was 7 (2-9) days. Mean postoperative creatinine was 1.05 mg/dl (0.8-1.85) and mean postoperative eGFR was 72 (36-83). During a median follow up time of 25.5 months (12-53), 4 (36.4%) patients experienced recurrence of urothelial cancer at conventional imaging follow up and 2 (18.2%) died due to its progression. Conclusions: In our initial experience RAPHUR can be proposed to selected cases of distal ureteral carcinoma with optimal perioperative and functional outcomes. However, cancer control may be undermined compared to nephroureterectomy. Thus, further prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 851.e1-851.e10
Author(s):  
Javier A. Piraino ◽  
Zachary A. Snow ◽  
Daniel C. Edwards ◽  
Shaun Hager ◽  
Brian H. McGreen ◽  
...  

Videourology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Massanova ◽  
Felice Crocetto ◽  
Guglielmo Zeccolini ◽  
Giorgio Mazzon ◽  
Fabio Esposito ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document