Confined Monolayer Ice Between CaF2 (111) and Graphene: Structure and Stability

Water monolayer can form in layered confined systems. Here, CaF2 (111) and graphene are chosen as modeling systems to explore the structure and stability of confined monolayer water. First, water molecules tend to intercalate into a confined space between graphene and CaF2, rather than on a bare surface of graphene. Water molecules can move fast in the confined space due to a low diffusion barrier. These water molecules are likely to aggregate together, forming monolayer ice. Four ice phases including ice II, ice III, ice IV, and ice Ih are compared in this confined system. Intriguingly, all the ice phases undergo very small deformation, indicating the 2D monolayer ice can be stable in the CaF2–graphene–confined system. Beyond, projected band structures are also plotted to understand the electronic behavior of these confined ice phases. Nearly all the bands originated from confined ices are flat and locate about 2–3 eV below the Fermi level. Binding energy calculations suggest that the stability sequence in this confined system as follows: Ih-up ≈ Ih-down ≈ II < IV < III. Our results bring new insights into the formation of water monolayer production in such a confined condition.

Synthesis, Single Crystal X-ray, Hirshfeld and DFT Studies of 1,8-Dichloro-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11-carboxylic Acid

In this paper, synthesis, single-crystal X-ray structure, Hirshfeld and DFT studies of 1,8-dichloro-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11-carboxylic acid are discussed. Different intermolecular contacts affecting the crystal stability are studied using Hirshfeld calculations. The H…Cl and O…H contacts are the most significant, showing corresponding interaction distances of 2.731 Å (Cl2…H10) and 1.681Å (H1…O1), 2.328 Å (O1…H13), 2.510 Å (O1…H12) based on Hirshfeld calculations. DFT calculations are carried out to study the electronic behavior, as well as the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra of the synthesized compound. The computed NMR chemical shifts show excellent correlation with the experimental data (R2 = 0.9884–0.9705).