prognostics factors
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Niamien Patrice Koffi ◽  
Frank Kouakou ◽  
Laaguili Jawad ◽  
Mandour Cherkaoui ◽  
Gazzaz Miloud ◽  
...  

Background: The surgery outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) for some authors depend to the clinical signs (obesity, smoking, sex, age, patient’s activity, and the surgery delays). Nevertheless, for others authors it’s depending to the chirurgical approach (anterior or posterior or the levels number of decompression in the cervical spine). There is no consensus although some arguments prevail over to others in the literature. Our study purpose was to determine the important clinical factors predictors of surgical outcome in patients with CSM. It’s a retrospective study of 107 patients admitted to the Mohamed V hospital in Rabat over 06 years from January 2013 to December 2018 for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) operated and were followed up for 1year. Their neurological status pre and postoperative was assessed using the Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and others prognostics factors such as sex, age, duration of symptoms, Cobbs angle, number of discs compressed, MODIC class signal and, (P<0.05) was statistically significant. Patients were classified into 02 groups, youngers patients in group 1 = G1 (<60 years of age; n = 70) and an elderly patients group = G2 (>/=60 years of age; n = 37). The mean age = 52.72 years [42.27-63.16], male 64.5% against 35.5% of women, a sex ratio = 2/1 in favor of men. In G1, mean age X1= 45.6 years. In G 2, mean age X2 = 61.85 years. The average delays for surgery = 11.28 months [6-18.19]. In G1 it was 10.30 months and 16.34 months in G2. The pre operatory JOA score (JOA PREO) = 9.87 +/- 2.033. JOA PREO score was 11 and 7 respectively in G1 and G2. The prevalence of MODIC (MC) = 52.23% and type 2 of MC was predominant in both groups, with p> 0.05. G1 patients underwent an ACDF in 82% and laminectomy in 18%. In G 2 laminectomy was performed in 50% and the anterior discectomy in 21.73%, corporectomy in 28.27%. After surgery, JOA score passed to severe to moderate 13.48 and 13.27 after 1year of follow-up in G1 and G2. In conclusion those factors such as sex, number of discs involved, and Cobbs angle on prognosis were not statistically significant (P>0.05) but patient’s age and duration of symptoms < 1 year predict to have more neurologic improvement (P<0.05) according to the JOA score.


Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 758
Author(s):  
Benjamin Thoreau ◽  
Joris Galland ◽  
Maxime Delrue ◽  
Marie Neuwirth ◽  
Alain Stepanian ◽  
...  

The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) is high during severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to identify predictive and prognostic factors of PE in non-ICU hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In the retrospective multicenter observational CLOTVID cohort, we enrolled patients with confirmed RT-PCR COVID-19 who were hospitalized in a medicine ward and also underwent a CT pulmonary angiography for a PE suspicion. Baseline data, laboratory biomarkers, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Predictive and prognostics factors of PE were identified by using logistic multivariate and by Cox regression models, respectively. A total of 174 patients were enrolled, among whom 86 (median [IQR] age of 66 years [55–77]) had post-admission PE suspicion, with 30/86 (34.9%) PE being confirmed. PE occurrence was independently associated with the lack of long-term anticoagulation or thromboprophylaxis (OR [95%CI], 72.3 [3.6–4384.8]) D-dimers ≥ 2000 ng/mL (26.3 [4.1–537.8]) and neutrophils ≥ 7.0 G/L (5.8 [1.4–29.5]). The presence of these two biomarkers was associated with a higher risk of PE (p = 0.0002) and death or ICU transfer (HR [95%CI], 12.9 [2.5–67.8], p < 0.01). In hospitalized non-ICU severe COVID-19 patients with clinical PE suspicion, the lack of anticoagulation, D-dimers ≥ 2000 ng/mL, neutrophils ≥ 7.0 G/L, and these two biomarkers combined might be useful predictive markers of PE and prognosis, respectively.


The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S97-S98
Author(s):  
A. Boussarsar ◽  
C. Zaidi ◽  
F. Noubbigh ◽  
A. Hamdoun ◽  
J. Yahyaoui ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii385
Author(s):  
P. Neji ◽  
R.S. Conde ◽  
S. Esteves ◽  
M.T.A. Alexandre ◽  
M. Ferreira ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iii18
Author(s):  
Mariem Benhami ◽  
Hajar Ouahbi ◽  
Layla El Achhab ◽  
Lamia Amaadour ◽  
Zineb Benbrahim ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 195 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
francois thomas ◽  
alezra eric ◽  
forzini thomas ◽  
saint fabien

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document