Spring distraction system to correct early onset scoliosis: 2 year follow-up results from 24 patients

Current surgical treatment options for Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS), with distraction- or growth-guidance systems, show limited growth and high complication rates. We developed the Spring Distraction System (SDS), which does not have to be periodically lengthened and which provides continuous corrective force to stimulate spinal growth. This study aimed to assess curve correction and maintenance, spinal growth, and complication rate following SDS treatment. All primary- and revision patients (conversion from failed other systems) with SDS and ≥2 years follow-up were included. Outcome measures were coronal Cobb angle, sagittal parameters, spinal length measurements and complications and re-operations. Radiographic parameters were compared pre-operatively, post-operatively and at latest follow-up. Spinal length increase was expressed as mm/year. Twenty-four skeletally immature EOS patients (18 primary and 6 revision cases) were included. There were 5 idiopathic, 7 congenital, 3 syndromic and 9 neuromuscular EOS patients. Mean age at implantation was 9.1 years (primary: 8.4; conversion: 11.2). Major curve improved from 60.3° to 35.3°, and was maintained at 40.6° at latest follow-up. Mean spring length increase during follow-up was 10.4mm/year. T1-S1 length increased 13.6mm/year and the instrumented segment length showed a mean increase of 0.8mm/segment/year. In total, 17 re-operations were performed. Ten re-operations were performed to treat 9 implant-related complications. In addition, 7 patients showed spinal growth that exceeded expected growth velocity; their springs were re-tensioned during a small re-operation. Spring distraction may be feasible as an alternative to current growing spine solutions. Curve correction and growth could be maintained satisfactory without the need for repetitive lengthening procedures. Complications and re-operations could not be prevented, which emphasizes the need for further improvement.

Understanding the implant performance of magnetically controlled growing spine rods: a review article

Purpose Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) (defined as a curvature of the spine ≥ 10° with onset before 10 years of age) if not properly treated, can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Traditionally Growing Rods (TGRs), implants fixated to the spine and extended every 6–8 months by surgery, are considered the gold standard, but Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGRs) avoid multiple surgeries. While the potential benefit of outpatient distraction procedure with MCGR is huge, concerns still remain about its risks, up to the release of a Medical Device Alert (MDA) by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advising not to implant MCGRs until further notice. The aim of this literature review is to (1) give an overview on the use of MCGRs and (2) identify what is currently understood about the surgical, implant and patient factors associated with the use of MCGRs. Methods Systematic literature review. Results Surgical factors such as use of single rod configuration or incorrect rod contouring might affect early failure of MCGRs. Patient’s older age and higher BMI are correlated with rod slippage. Wear debris and distraction mechanism failure may result from implant design and iteration. Conclusion Despite the complications reported, this technology still offers one of the best solutions to spine surgeons dealing with severe EOS. Lowering the complication rate by identifying risk factors for failure is possible and further studies in this direction are required. Once the risk factors are well described, some of these can be addressed enabling a safer use of MCGRs.

Rerooting Multi-type Branching Trees: The Infinite Spine Case

We prove local convergence results for rerooted conditioned multi-type Galton–Watson trees. The limit objects are multitype variants of the random sin-tree constructed by Aldous (1991), and differ according to which types recur infinitely often along the backwards growing spine.

The Angle of Trunk Rotation in School Children: A Study from an Idiopathic Scoliosis Screening. Prevalence and Optimal Age Screening Value

(1) Background: Idiopathic scoliosis is a deformity of the growing spine. It affects 2–3% of adolescents; yet its cause is still unknown. At the early stage of idiopathic scoliosis (IS), the signs are not very noticeable. That is why the primarily school-based screening for scoliosis is so important. (2) Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 6850 respondents. Participants were elementary school students in the metropolitan area of Poland. The suspicion of IS was based on detection of three-dimensional deformity of the spine using scoliometer. (3) Results: Respondents were divided into two groups: Angle of trunk rotation (ATR) = 0–3º and ATR > 3º. Presented research using a referral criterion of 5º ATR showed that in the group of participants who had ATR > 3º the largest percentage of 5 degree values was recorded at the second and third measurement level of the spine (30.5%, 31.1%, respectively). Analyzing the differences between the two groups of girls (ATR = 0–3º, ATR > 3º), statistically significant differences were recorded between 9 and 11 years of age (p = 0.0388). Girls with ATR > 3º at all measuring levels are significantly slimmer than girls with ATR 0–3º; (4) Conclusions: Age; sex, and risk of developing angle of trunk rotation are very closely associated. The main thoracic (level 2) and thoraco-lumbar (level 3) level of measuring of the spine appears to be the most differentiating in the diagnosis of scoliosis. Girls with a lower degree of trunk deformity (4–6º trunk rotation), which can present mild scoliosis and those with a higher degree (7º trunk rotation) have lower body mass than girls within the norm.