differential methylation analysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

33
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulazeez Giwa ◽  
Sophia Catherine Rossouw ◽  
Azeez Fatai ◽  
Junaid Gamieldien ◽  
Alan Christoffels ◽  
...  

Background: Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in childhood. Amplification of MYCN in neuroblastoma is a predictor of poor prognosis. Materials and methods: DNA methylation data from the TARGET data matrix were stratified into MYCN amplified and non-amplified groups. Differential methylation analysis, clustering, recursive feature elimination (RFE), machine learning (ML), Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier estimates were performed. Results and Conclusion: 663 CpGs were differentially methylated between the two groups. A total of 25 CpGs were selected by RFE for clustering and ML, and a 100% clustering accuracy was obtained. ML validation on three external datasets produced high accuracy scores of 100%, 97% and 93%. Eight survival-associated CpGs were also identified. Therapeutic interventions may need to be targeted to patient subgroups.


Author(s):  
Yongjun Piao ◽  
Wanxue Xu ◽  
Kwang Ho Park ◽  
Keun Ho Ryu ◽  
Rong Xiang

Background: With advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, the bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA followed by sequencing has become the predominant technique for quantifying genome-wide DNA methylation at single-base resolution. A large number of computational approaches are available in literature for identifying differentially methylated regions in bisulfite sequencing data, and more are being developed continuously. Results: Here, we focused on a comprehensive evaluation of commonly used differential methylation analysis methods and describe the potential strengths and limitations of each method. We found that there are large differences among methods, and no single method consistently ranked first in all benchmarking. Moreover, smoothing seemed not to improve the performance greatly, and a small number of replicates created more difficulties in the computational analysis of BS-seq data than low sequencing depth. Conclusions: Data analysis and interpretation should be performed with great care, especially when the number of replicates or sequencing depth is limited.


Epigenomes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Celina Whalley ◽  
Karl Payne ◽  
Enric Domingo ◽  
Andrew Blake ◽  
Susan Richman ◽  
...  

Background: Abnormal CpG methylation in cancer is ubiquitous and generally detected in tumour specimens using a variety of techniques at a resolution encompassing single CpG loci to genome wide coverage. Analysis of samples with very low DNA inputs, such as formalin fixed (FFPE) biopsy specimens from clinical trials or circulating tumour DNA is challenging at the genome-wide level because of lack of available input. We present the results of low input experiments into the Illumina Infinium HD methylation assay on FFPE specimens and ctDNA samples. Methods: For all experiments, the Infinium HD assay for methylation was used. In total, forty-eight FFPE specimens were used at varying concentrations (lowest input 50 ng); eighteen blood derived specimens (lowest input 10 ng) and six matched ctDNA input (lowest input 10 ng)/fresh tumour specimens (lowest input 250 ng) were processed. Downstream analysis was performed in R/Bioconductor for quality control metrics and differential methylation analysis as well as copy number calls. Results: Correlation coefficients for CpG methylation were high at the probe level averaged R2 = 0.99 for blood derived samples and R2 > 0.96 for the FFPE samples. When matched ctDNA/fresh tumour samples were compared, R2 > 0.91 between the two. Results of differential methylation analysis did not vary significantly by DNA input in either the blood or FFPE groups. There were differences seen in the ctDNA group as compared to their paired tumour sample, possibly because of enrichment for tumour material without contaminating normal. Copy number variants observed in the tumour were generally also seen in the paired ctDNA sample with good concordance via DQ plot. Conclusions: The Illumina Infinium HD methylation assay can robustly detect methylation across a range of sample types, including ctDNA, down to an input of 10 ng. It can also reliably detect oncogenic methylation changes and copy number variants in ctDNA. These findings demonstrate that these samples can now be accessed by methylation array technology, allowing analysis of these important sample types.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (S6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyu Hu ◽  
Li Tang ◽  
Linconghua Wang ◽  
Fang-Xiang Wu ◽  
Min Li

Abstract Background DNA methylation in the human genome is acknowledged to be widely associated with biological processes and complex diseases. The Illumina Infinium methylation arrays have been approved as one of the most efficient and universal technologies to investigate the whole genome changes of methylation patterns. As methylation arrays may still be the dominant method for detecting methylation in the anticipated future, it is crucial to develop a reliable workflow to analysis methylation array data. Results In this study, we develop a web service MADA for the whole process of methylation arrays data analysis, which includes the steps of a comprehensive differential methylation analysis pipeline: pre-processing (data loading, quality control, data filtering, and normalization), batch effect correction, differential methylation analysis, and downstream analysis. In addition, we provide the visualization of pre-processing, differentially methylated probes or regions, gene ontology, pathway and cluster analysis results. Moreover, a customization function for users to define their own workflow is also provided in MADA. Conclusions With the analysis of two case studies, we have shown that MADA can complete the whole procedure of methylation array data analysis. MADA provides a graphical user interface and enables users with no computational skills and limited bioinformatics background to carry on complicated methylation array data analysis. The web server is available at: http://120.24.94.89:8080/MADA


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 221.2-221
Author(s):  
A. Julià ◽  
A. Gómez ◽  
A. Fernández Nebro ◽  
F. J. Blanco ◽  
A. Erra ◽  
...  

Background:Blocking Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) activity is a successful therapeutic approach for approximately 60% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To date, however, the biological basis of the lack of efficacy of anti-TNF agents is unknown.Objectives:The objective of present study was to characterize the biological basis of anti-TNF lack of efficacy in RA using an epigenomic data approach in two steps: first, to assess the differential methylation changes between responders and non-responders and second, to use this differential methylation profile in a systems biology approach to infer differential methylated biological modules according to anti-TNF response.Methods:A total of n=68 patients diagnosed with RA according to the ACR-EULAR criteria belonging to 16 Hospitals across Spain were recruited. All patients were >18 years old, with more than 6 months of disease evolution and a baseline disease activity of DAS28 > 3.2. Treatment response was defined according to the EULAR criteria at week 12. Good and moderate responders were aggregated into a single responder group. Genomic DNA was collected at baseline and the methylation profile was assessed using the Illumina Infinium EPIC array, which interrogates 850,000 methylation CpG sites across the genome. Differential Methylation analysis, biological pathway association and the systems Biology approach using Protein-Protein Interaction Networks, were conducted using the R statistical language and the Bioconductor libraries.Results:From 68 anti-TNF treated patients, n=27 (39.7%) were good responders, n=26 (38.2%) moderate responders and n=15 (22.05%) non-responders at week 12 of treatment. Differential methylation analysis identified two distinctive biological profiles associated with the clinical response: responders were associated to interleukin and cytokine production, and non-responders were associated with biological pathways associated to TGF-Beta production and T cell regulation. Using these differentially methylated profiles, epigenetic modules with differentially methylated hotspots between responders and non-responders were also found. Two epigenetic modules with significant enrichment in inflammatory and interleukin production and immune regulatory processes were validated in an independent patient cohort.Conclusion:The epigenetic analysis of whole blood from RA patients using a module-based approach shows reproducible biological mechanisms associated with the response to anti-TNF therapy.Acknowledgments:We would like to thank the clinical researchers and patients participating in the IMID Consortium for their collaborationDisclosure of Interests:Antonio Julià: None declared, Antonio Gómez: None declared, Antonio Fernández Nebro: None declared, Francisco J. Blanco Grant/research support from: Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Bristol MS, Amgen, Pfizer, Abbvie, TRB Chemedica International, Glaxo SmithKline, Archigen Biotech Limited, Novartis, Nichi-iko pharmaceutical Co, Genentech, Jannsen Research & Development, UCB Biopharma, Centrexion Theurapeutics, Celgene, Roche, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Biohope, Corbus Pharmaceutical, Tedec Meiji Pharma, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd, Gilead Sciences Inc, Consultant of: Lilly, Bristol MS, Pfizer, Alba Erra: None declared, Simon Sánchez Fernandez: None declared, Jordi Monfort: None declared, Mercedes Alperi-López: None declared, Isidoro González-Álvaro Grant/research support from: Roche Laboratories, Consultant of: Lilly, Sanofi, Paid instructor for: Lilly, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, MSD, Roche, Lilly, Rosario Garcia de Vicuna Grant/research support from: BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Gebro, Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Paid instructor for: Lilly, Speakers bureau: BMS, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Raimón Sanmartí Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, BMS, Roche and Pfizer, Cesar Diaz Torne: None declared, Carlos Marras Fernandez Cid: None declared, Jesús Tornero Molina: None declared, Núria Palau: None declared, Raquel M Lastra: None declared, Jordi Lladós: None declared, Sara Marsal: None declared


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Chen ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Mingyue Xu ◽  
Boxue Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To develop a CpG-based prognostic prediction model to provide survival risk prediction for colorectal cancer. Differential methylation analysis was performed on 309 colorectal cancer and 38 adjacent cancer specimens from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Results: 2113 hypermethylation sites as well as 723 hypomethylation sites were screened out and 16 related CpG methylation loci were further identified. The risk score was calculated based on the methylation sites identified and utilized as an independent prognostic variable for multivariate Cox regression prediction model, which was further optimized by the independent prognostic factors (including stage and risk score). Conclusion: This study has identified several potential prognostic biomarkers and established a CpG-based prognostic prediction model for colorectal cancer, which provides a valuable reference for future clinical research.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celina Whalley ◽  
Karl Payne ◽  
Enric Domingo ◽  
Andrew Blake ◽  
Susan Richman ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundCpG methylation in cancer is ubiquitous and generally detected in tumour specimens using a variety of techniques at a resolution encompassing single CpG loci to genome wide. Analysis of samples with very low DNA inputs, such as formalin fixed (FFPE) biopsy specimens from clinical trials or circulating tumour DNA has been challenging and has only been typically at single CpG sites. Analysis of genome wide methylation in these specimens has been limited because of the relative expense of techniques need to carry this out. We present the results of low input experiments into the Illumina Infinium HD methylation assay on FFPE specimens and ctDNA samples.MethodsFor all experiments, the Infinium HD assay for Methylation was used. In total, forty-eight FFPE specimens were used at varying concentrations (lowest input 50ng), eighteen blood derived specimens (lowest input 10ng) and six matched ctDNA input (lowest input 10ng) / fresh tumour specimens (lowest input 250ng) were processed. Downstream analysis was performed in R/Bioconductor for QC metrics and differential methylation analysis as well as copy number calls.ResultsCorrelation coefficients for CpG methylation at the probe level averaged R2=0.99 for blood derived samples and R2>0.96 for the FFPE samples. When matched ctDNA/fresh tumour samples were compared R2>0.91. Results of differential methylation analysis did not vary significantly by DNA input in either the blood or FFPE groups. There were differences seen in the ctDNA group as compared to their paired tumour sample, possibly because of enrichment for tumour material without contaminating normal. Copy number variants observed in the tumour were generally also seen in the paired ctDNA sample.ConclusionsThe Illumina Infinium HD methylation assay can robustly detect methylation across a range of sample types, including ctDNA, down to a input of 10ng. It can also reliably detect oncogenic methylation changes and copy number variants in ctDNA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viivi Halla-aho ◽  
Harri Lähdesmäki

ABSTRACTBisulfite sequencing (BS-seq) is a popular method for measuring DNA methylation in basepair-resolution. Many BS-seq data analysis tools utilize the assumption of spatial correlation among the neighboring cytosines’ methylation states. While being a fair assumption, most existing methods leave out the possibility of deviation from the spatial correlation pattern. Our approach builds on a method which combines a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a likelihood that is specific for BS-seq data and that incorporates a spatial correlation for methylation levels. We propose a novel technique using a sparsity promoting prior to enable cytosines deviating from the spatial correlation pattern. The method is tested with both simulated and real BS-seq data and compared to other differential methylation analysis tools.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijie Zhang ◽  
Qi Zhan ◽  
Mark Eckert ◽  
Allen Zhu ◽  
Agnieszka Chryplewicz ◽  
...  

AbstractEpitranscriptome profiling using MeRIP-seq is a powerful technique for in vivo functional studies of reversible RNA modifications. We develop RADAR, a comprehensive analytical tool for detecting differentially methylated loci in MeRIP-seq data. RADAR enables accurate identification of altered methylation sites by accommodating variability of pre-immunoprecipitation expression level and post-immunoprecipitation count using different strategies. In addition, it is compatible with complex study design when covariates need to be incorporated in the analysis. Through simulation and real datasets analyses, we show that RADAR leads to more accurate and reproducible differential methylation analysis results than alternatives, which is available at https://github.com/scottzijiezhang/RADAR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document