food retrieval
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

17
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2137 (1) ◽  
pp. 012054
Author(s):  
Kai Zhou

Abstract With the improvement of living standard, people pay more and more attention to their health. Food is the foundation of human life, modern society places more emphasis on a balanced diet, which controls fat, protein, carbohydrate and vitamin intake. So food computing is more and more important. Food retrieval is one of the important research directions in food computing. On the basis of food retrieval, we can predict ingredients and instructions in each dish, according to the ingredients and instructions to speculate on the visual effect of cooking, which can guide human reasonable diet, analyse human diet structure and diet culture and so on. In this paper, we focus on cross-modal retrieval between food image and recipe. Firstly, we analyze the problems existing in the present method. Based on the problems existing in the existing method, a fusion image feature and title regularization with adversarial network is proposed, which uses the idea of generative adversarial to align the modes, fuses the local features and global features of the image, and adds the semantic regularity of title to improve the accuracy of the retrieval.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maia S. Pujara ◽  
Nicole K. Ciesinski ◽  
Joseph F. Reyelts ◽  
Sarah E.V. Rhodes ◽  
Elisabeth A. Murray

AbstractLesion studies in macaques suggest dissociable functions of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and medial frontal cortex (MFC), with OFC being essential for goal-directed decision making and MFC supporting social cognition. Bilateral amygdala damage results in impairments in both of these domains. There are extensive reciprocal connections between these prefrontal areas and the amygdala; however, it is not known whether the dissociable roles of OFC and MFC depend on functional interactions with the amygdala. To test this possibility, we compared the performance of male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with crossed surgical disconnection of the amygdala and either MFC (MFC x AMY, n=4) or OFC (OFC x AMY, n=4) to a group of unoperated controls (CON, n=5). All monkeys were assessed for their performance on two tasks to measure: (1) food-retrieval latencies while viewing videos of social and nonsocial stimuli in a test of social interest, and (2) object choices based on current food value using reinforcer devaluation in a test of goal-directed decision making. Compared to the CON group, the MFC x AMY group, but not the OFC x AMY group, showed significantly reduced food-retrieval latencies while viewing videos of conspecifics, indicating reduced social valuation and/or interest. By contrast, on the devaluation task, group OFC x AMY, but not group MFC x AMY, displayed deficits on object choices following changes in food value. These data indicate that the MFC and OFC must functionally interact with the amygdala to support normative social and nonsocial valuation, respectively.Significance StatementAscribing value to conspecifics (social) vs. objects (nonsocial) may be supported by distinct but overlapping brain networks. Here we test whether two nonoverlapping regions of the prefrontal cortex, the medial frontal cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex, must causally interact with the amygdala to sustain social valuation and goal-directed decision making, respectively. We found that these prefrontal-amygdala circuits are functionally dissociable, lending support for the idea that medial frontal and orbital frontal cortex make independent contributions to cognitive appraisals of the environment. These data provide a neural framework for distinct value assignment processes and may enhance our understanding of the cognitive deficits observed following brain injury or in the development of mental health disorders.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Gomez-Melara ◽  
Rufino Acosta-Naranjo ◽  
Alba Castellano-Navarro ◽  
Victor Beltrán Francés ◽  
Alvaro Lopez Caicoya ◽  
...  

AbstractIn several species, rank predicts access to food, and subordinates may need specific behavioural strategies to get a share of resources. This may be especially important in despotic species, where resources are strongly biased in favour of dominants and subordinates may more strongly rely on specific tactics to maximize food intake. Here, we compared three macaque species with an experimental set-up reproducing feeding competition contest. Following our predictions, more tolerant species mostly retrieved food in the presence of others and were less dependent on specific tactics. Contrarily, subordinates in more despotic species more likely collected food (1) when dominants could not see food or (2) were attacking others, (3) while “dissimulating”, or (4) “storing food”. Our study reveals that dominance styles reliably predict the probability of using specific food retrieval tactics and provides important insights on the social conditions that might have led to the emergence of tactical deception.


2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Dell'Anna ◽  
Miquel Llorente ◽  
Brigitte M. Weiß ◽  
Lorenzo Fersen ◽  
Federica Amici

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 20130009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia P. Melis ◽  
Michael Tomasello

Many animal species cooperate, but the underlying proximate mechanisms are often unclear. We presented chimpanzees with a mutualistic collaborative food-retrieval task requiring complementary roles, and tested subjects' ability to help their partner perform her role. For each role, subjects required a different tool, and the tools were not interchangeable. We gave one individual in each dyad both tools, and measured subjects' willingness to transfer a tool to their partner as well as which tool (correct versus incorrect) they transferred. Most subjects helped their partner and transferred the tool the partner needed. Thus, chimpanzees not only coordinate different roles, but they also know which particular action the partner needs to perform. These results add to previous findings suggesting that many of chimpanzees' limitations in collaboration are, perhaps, more motivational than cognitive.


Biosystems ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Porr ◽  
Florentin Wörgötter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document