High blood pressure, screened with a patient’s blood pressure (BP), is found in 1 out of 3 adults in the United States. A cohort of 39 participants had BP measured following the American Heart Association (AHA) protocol, utilizing three different measurement devices: manual sphygmomanometer (MA), automated Midmark IQ vitals (IQ), and an automated Omron home unit (OM). All subjects had BP measured with the IQ device while not adhering to the AHA protocol. Two protocols were denoted PR (protocol following AHA guidelines) or TY (lacking protocol). Results demonstrated a mean systolic BP with IQ-TY > OM-PR > IQ-PR > MA-PR, all (p≤0.01). The mean diastolic BP for IQ-TY > IQ-PR, OM-PR, and MA-PR, with IQ-TY significantly higher than the other 3 (p≤0.01). Comparing participants categorized in each hypertension stage, IQ-TY categorized 7participants as stage 1 hypertensive while OM-PR categorized 3, and both MA-PR and IQ-PR only categorized 1. Study results suggest a potential for possible misclassification of patients based on BP protocol.