chromatin boundary
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Author(s):  
Caroline L Harrold ◽  
Matthew E Gosden ◽  
Lars L P Hanssen ◽  
Rosa J Stolper ◽  
Damien J Downes ◽  
...  

AbstractMammalian genomes are subdivided into large (50-2000 kb) regions of chromatin referred to as Topologically Associating Domains (TADs or sub-TADs). Chromatin within an individual TAD contacts itself more frequently than with regions in surrounding TADs thereby directing enhancer-promoter interactions. In many cases, the borders of TADs are defined by convergently orientated boundary elements associated with CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), which stabilises the cohesin complex on chromatin and prevents its translocation. This delimits chromatin loop extrusion which is thought to underlie the formation of TADs. However, not all CTCF-bound sites act as boundaries and, importantly, not all TADs are flanked by convergent CTCF sites. Here, we examined the CTCF binding sites within a ∼70 kb sub-TAD containing the duplicated mouse α-like globin genes and their five enhancers (5’-R1-R2-R3-Rm-R4-α1-α2-3’). The 5’ border of this sub-TAD is defined by a pair of CTCF sites. Surprisingly, we show that deletion of the CTCF binding sites within and downstream of the α-globin locus leaves the sub-TAD largely intact. The predominant 3’ border of the sub-TAD is defined by a steep reduction in contacts: this corresponds to the transcribed α2-globin gene rather than the CTCF sites at the 3’-end of the sub-TAD. Of interest, the almost identical α1- and α2-globin genes interact differently with the enhancers, resulting in preferential expression of the proximal α1-globin gene which behaves as a partial boundary between the enhancers and the distal α2-globin gene. Together, these observations provide direct evidence that actively transcribed genes can behave as boundary elements.Significance StatementMammalian genomes are complex, organised 3D structures, partitioned into Topologically Associating Domains (TADs): chromatin regions that preferentially self-interact. These chromatin interactions are thought to be driven by a mechanism that continuously extrudes chromatin loops, forming structures delimited by chromatin boundary elements and reflecting the activity of enhancers and promoters. Boundary elements bind architectural proteins such as CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF). Previously, an overlap between the functional roles of enhancers and promoters has been shown. However, whether there is overlap between enhancers/promoters and boundary elements is not known. Here, we show that actively transcribed genes can also behave as boundary elements, similar to CTCF boundaries. In both cases, multi-protein complexes bound to these regions may stall the process of chromatin loop extrusion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 3119-3133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Ziwei Liao ◽  
Huacheng Luo ◽  
Aissa Benyoucef ◽  
Yuanyuan Kang ◽  
...  

Abstract Aberrant activation of the TAL1 is associated with up to 60% of T-ALL cases and is involved in CTCF-mediated genome organization within the TAL1 locus, suggesting that CTCF boundary plays a pathogenic role in T-ALL. Here, we show that −31-Kb CTCF binding site (−31CBS) serves as chromatin boundary that defines topologically associating domain (TAD) and enhancer/promoter interaction required for TAL1 activation. Deleted or inverted −31CBS impairs TAL1 expression in a context-dependent manner. Deletion of −31CBS reduces chromatin accessibility and blocks long-range interaction between the +51 erythroid enhancer and TAL1 promoter-1 leading to inhibition of TAL1 expression in erythroid cells, but not T-ALL cells. However, in TAL1-expressing T-ALL cells, the leukemia-prone TAL1 promoter-IV specifically interacts with the +19 stem cell enhancer located 19 Kb downstream of TAL1 and this interaction is disrupted by the −31CBS inversion in T-ALL cells. Inversion of −31CBS in Jurkat cells alters chromatin accessibility, histone modifications and CTCF-mediated TAD leading to inhibition of TAL1 expression and TAL1-driven leukemogenesis. Thus, our data reveal that −31CBS acts as critical regulator to define +19-enhancer and the leukemic prone promoter IV interaction for TAL1 activation in T-ALL. Manipulation of CTCF boundary can alter TAL1 TAD and oncogenic transcription networks in leukemogenesis.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis-Valentin Méteignier ◽  
Cécile Lecampion ◽  
Florent Velay ◽  
Cécile Vriet ◽  
Laura Dimnet ◽  
...  

AbstractThe organization of the genome into transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin domains requires well-delineated chromatin boundaries and insulator functions in order to maintain the identity of adjacent genomic loci with antagonistic chromatin marks and functionality. In plants that lack known chromatin insulators, the mechanisms that prevent heterochromatin spreading into euchromatin remain to be identified. Here, we show that DNA Topoisomerase VI participates in a chromatin boundary function that safeguards the expression of genes in euchromatin islands within silenced heterochromatin regions. While some transposable elements are reactivated in mutants of the Topoisomerase VI complex, genes insulated in euchromatin islands within heterochromatic regions of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome are specifically downregulated. H3K9me2 levels consistently increase at euchromatin island loci and decrease at some TE loci. We further show that Topoisomerase VI physically interacts with S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthase MAT3, which is required for H3K9me2 deposition. Topoisomerase VI promotes MAT3 occupancy on heterochromatic elements and its exclusion from euchromatic islands, thereby providing a mechanistic insight into the essential role of Topoisomerase VI in the delimitation of chromatin domains.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Clarkson ◽  
Emma A. Deeks ◽  
Ralph Samarista ◽  
Hulkar Mamayusupova ◽  
Victor B. Zhurkin ◽  
...  

AbstractThe CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) organises the genome in 3D through DNA loops and in 1D by setting boundaries isolating different chromatin states, but these processes are not well understood. Here we focus on the relationship between CTCF binding and the decrease of the Nucleosome Repeat Length (NRL) for ∼20 adjacent nucleosomes, affecting up to 10% of the mouse genome. We found that the chromatin boundary near CTCF is created by the nucleosome-depleted region (NDR) asymmetrically located >40 nucleotides 5’-upstream from the centre of CTCF motif. The strength of CTCF binding to DNA is correlated with the decrease of NRL near CTCF and anti-correlated with the level of asymmetry of the nucleosome array. Individual chromatin remodellers have different contributions, with Snf2h having the strongest effect on the NRL decrease near CTCF and Chd4 playing a major role in the symmetry breaking. Upon differentiation of embryonic stem cells to neural progenitor cells and embryonic fibroblasts, a subset of common CTCF sites preserved in all three cell types maintains a relatively small local NRL despite genome-wide NRL increase. The sites which lost CTCF upon differentiation are characterised by nucleosome rearrangement 3’-downstream, but the boundary defined by the NDR 5’-upstream of CTCF motif remains.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Matsushima ◽  
Naoaki Sakamoto ◽  
Akinori Awazu

ABSTRACTChromosomes consist of various domains with different transcriptional activities separated by chromatin boundary sequences such as insulator sequences. Recent studies suggested that CTCF or other chromatin loop-forming protein binding sequences represented typical insulators. Alternatively, some long nucleosome-excluding DNA sequences were also reported to exhibit insulator activities in yeast and sea urchin chromosomes although specific binding of loop-forming proteins were not expected for them. However, the mechanism of the insulator activities of these sequences and the possibilities of similar insulators existing in other organisms remained unclear. In this study, we first constructed and performed simulations of a coarse-grained chromatin model containing nucleosome-rich and nucleosome-excluding DNA regions. We found that a long nucleosome-excluding region between two nucleosome-rich regions could markedly hinder the associations of two neighboring chromatin regions owing to the stronger long-term-averaged rigidity of the nucleosome-excluding region compared to that of nucleosome-rich regions. Subsequent analysis of the genome wide nucleosome positioning, protein binding, and DNA rigidity in human cells revealed that some nucleosome-excluding rigid DNA sequences without bound chromatin looping proteins could exhibit insulator activities, functioning as chromatin boundaries in various regions of human chromosomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Fedotova ◽  
Chaevia Clendinen ◽  
Artem Bonchuk ◽  
Vladic Mogila ◽  
Tsutomu Aoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e1007442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Kyrchanova ◽  
Amina Kurbidaeva ◽  
Marat Sabirov ◽  
Nikolay Postika ◽  
Daniel Wolle ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minou Bina

AbstractThe human H19 and IGF2 genes share an Imprinting Control Region (ICR) that regulates gene expression in a parent-of-origin dependent manner. Understanding of the ICR sequence organization is critical to accurate localization of disease-associated abnormalities including Beckwith-Wiedemann and Silver-Russell syndromes. Previous studies established that the ICR of the H19 - IGF2 imprinted domain included several repeated DNA segments. Using BLAST, BLAT, and Clustal Omega, I conducted detailed sequence comparisons to evaluate the annotation of the unique-repeats upstream of the H19 transcription start site (TSS) and to investigate the extent of similarities among the various repeats. Initial analyses confirmed the existence of two DNA segments consisting of two types of repeats (A and B). However, I find that one of the repeats (B7) is unlikely to be a partial repeat. I provide the genomic positions of the various repeats in the build hg19 of the human genome. I also evaluated the previously predicted CTCF sites (1 to 7) in the context of the ENCODE data: including the positions of DNase I HS clusters and results of ChIP assays. My evaluations did not support the existence of CTCF site 5. Furthermore, the ENCODE data revealed a previously unknown chromatin boundary (consisting of CTCF, RAD21, and SMC3), in a CpG island (CpG27) between the A1 repeat and the H19 TSS. Furthermore, a sequence within this boundary corresponds to a newly discovered CTCF site (I named it CTCF site 8). My discovery of this chromatin boundary in CpG27 entails mechanistic implications.


Genetics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 205 (2) ◽  
pp. 589-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabienne Cleard ◽  
Daniel Wolle ◽  
Andrew M. Taverner ◽  
Tsutomu Aoki ◽  
Girish Deshpande ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document