Modulation of Abiotic Stress Responses in Rice by E3-Ubiquitin Ligases: A Promising Way to Develop Stress-Tolerant Crops

Plants are unable to physically escape environmental constraints and have, therefore, evolved a range of molecular and physiological mechanisms to maximize survival in an ever-changing environment. Among these, the post-translational modification of ubiquitination has emerged as an important mechanism to understand and improve the stress response. The ubiquitination of a given protein can change its abundance (through degradation), alter its localization, or even modulate its activity. Hence, ubiquitination increases the plasticity of the plant proteome in response to different environmental cues and can contribute to improve stress tolerance. Although ubiquitination is mediated by different enzymes, in this review, we focus on the importance of E3-ubiquitin ligases, which interact with the target proteins and are, therefore, highly associated with the mechanism specificity. We discuss their involvement in abiotic stress response and place them as putative candidates for ubiquitination-based development of stress-tolerant crops. This review covers recent developments in this field using rice as a reference for crops, highlighting the questions still unanswered.

The Molecular Basis of Sulfosugar Selectivity in Sulfoglycolysis

The sulfosugar sulfoquinovose (SQ) is produced by essentially all photosynthetic organisms on earth and is metabolized by bacteria through the process of sulfoglycolysis. The sulfoglycolytic Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway metabolises SQ to produce dihydroxyacetone phosphate and sulfolactaldehyde and is analogous to the classical Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas glycolysis pathway for the metabolism of glucose-6-phosphate, though the former only provides one C3 fragment to central metabolism, with excretion of the other C3 fragment as dihydroxypropanesulfonate. Here, we report a comprehensive structural and biochemical analysis of the three core steps of sulfoglycolysis catalyzed by SQ isomerase, sulfofructose (SF) kinase and sulfofructose-1-phosphate (SFP) aldolase. Our data shows that despite the superficial similarity of this pathway to glycolysis, the sulfoglycolytic enzymes are specific for SQ metabolites and are not catalytically active on related metabolites from glycolytic pathways. This observation is rationalized by 3D structures of each enzyme, which reveal the presence of conserved sulfonate-binding pockets. We show that SQ isomerase acts preferentially on the β-anomer of SQ and reversibly produces both SF and sulforhamnose (SR), a previously unknown sugar that acts as a transcriptional regulator for the transcriptional repressor CsqR that regulates SQ-utilization. We also demonstrate that SF kinase is a key regulatory enzyme for the pathway that experiences complex modulation by the metabolites AMP, ADP, ATP, F6P, FBP, PEP, and citrate, and we show that SFP aldolase reversibly synthesizes SFP. This body of work provides fresh insights into the mechanism, specificity and regulation of sulfoglycolysis and has important implications for understanding how this biochemistry interfaces with central metabolism in prokaryotes to process this major repository of biogeochemical sulfur.

The Molecular Basis of Sulfosugar Selectivity in Sulfoglycolysis

The sulfosugar sulfoquinovose (SQ) is produced by essentially all photosynthetic organisms on earth and is metabolized bacteria through the process of sulfoglycolysis. The sulfoglycolytic Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway metabolises SQ to produce dihydroxyacetone phosphate and sulfolactaldehyde and is analogous to the classical Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas glycolysis pathway for the metabolism of glucose-6-phosphate, though the former only provides one C3 fragment to central metabolism, with excretion of the other C3 fragment as dihydroxypropanesulfonate. Here, we report a comprehensive structural and biochemical analysis of the three core steps of sulfoglycolysis catalyzed by SQ isomerase, sulfofructose (SF) kinase and sulfofructose-1-phosphate aldolase. Our data shows that despite the superficial similarity of this pathway to glycolysis, the sulfoglycolytic enzymes are specific for SQ metabolites and are not catalytically active on related metabolites from glycolytic pathways. This observation is rationalized by 3D structures of each of these enzymes, which reveal the presence of conserved sulfonate-binding pockets. We show that SQ isomerase acts preferentially on the b-anomer of SQ and reversibly produces both SF and sulforhamnose (SR), a previously unknown sugar that acts as a transcriptional regulator for the transcriptional repressor CsqR that regulates SQ-utilisation. We also demonstrate that SF kinase is a key regulatory enzyme for the pathway that experiences complex allosteric modulation by the metabolites AMP, ADP, ATP, F6P, FBP, PEP, and citrate. This body of work provides fresh insights into the mechanism, specificity and regulation of sulfoglycolysis and has important implications for understanding how this biochemistry interfaces with central metabolism in prokaryotes to process this major repository of biogeochemical sulfur.

The Molecular Basis of Sulfosugar Selectivity in Sulfoglycolysis

The sulfosugar sulfoquinovose (SQ) is produced by essentially all photosynthetic organisms on earth and is metabolized bacteria through the process of sulfoglycolysis. The sulfoglycolytic Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway metabolises SQ to produce dihydroxyacetone phosphate and sulfolactaldehyde and is analogous to the classical Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas glycolysis pathway for the metabolism of glucose-6-phosphate, though the former only provides one C3 fragment to central metabolism, with excretion of the other C3 fragment as dihydroxypropanesulfonate. Here, we report a comprehensive structural and biochemical analysis of the three core steps of sulfoglycolysis catalyzed by SQ isomerase, sulfofructose (SF) kinase and sulfofructose-1-phosphate aldolase. Our data shows that despite the superficial similarity of this pathway to glycolysis, the sulfoglycolytic enzymes are specific for SQ metabolites and are not catalytically active on related metabolites from glycolytic pathways. This observation is rationalized by 3D structures of each of these enzymes, which reveal the presence of conserved sulfonate-binding pockets. We show that SQ isomerase acts preferentially on the b-anomer of SQ and reversibly produces both SF and sulforhamnose (SR), a previously unknown sugar that acts as a transcriptional regulator for the transcriptional repressor CsqR that regulates SQ-utilisation. We also demonstrate that SF kinase is a key regulatory enzyme for the pathway that experiences complex allosteric modulation by the metabolites AMP, ADP, ATP, F6P, FBP, PEP, and citrate. This body of work provides fresh insights into the mechanism, specificity and regulation of sulfoglycolysis and has important implications for understanding how this biochemistry interfaces with central metabolism in prokaryotes to process this major repository of biogeochemical sulfur.

The Molecular Basis of Sulfosugar Selectivity in Sulfoglycolysis

The sulfosugar sulfoquinovose (SQ) is produced by essentially all photosynthetic organisms on earth and is metabolized bacteria through the process of sulfoglycolysis. The sulfoglycolytic Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway metabolises SQ to produce dihydroxyacetone phosphate and sulfolactaldehyde and is analogous to the classical Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas glycolysis pathway for the metabolism of glucose-6-phosphate, though the former only provides one C3 fragment to central metabolism, with excretion of the other C3 fragment as dihydroxypropanesulfonate. Here, we report a comprehensive structural and biochemical analysis of the three core steps of sulfoglycolysis catalyzed by SQ isomerase, sulfofructose (SF) kinase and sulfofructose-1-phosphate aldolase. Our data shows that despite the superficial similarity of this pathway to glycolysis, the sulfoglycolytic enzymes are specific for SQ metabolites and are not catalytically active on related metabolites from glycolytic pathways. This observation is rationalized by 3D structures of each of these enzymes, which reveal the presence of conserved sulfonate-binding pockets. We show that SQ isomerase acts preferentially on the b-anomer of SQ and reversibly produces both SF and sulforhamnose (SR), a previously unknown sugar that acts as a transcriptional regulator for the transcriptional repressor CsqR that regulates SQ-utilisation. We also demonstrate that SF kinase is a key regulatory enzyme for the pathway that experiences complex allosteric modulation by the metabolites AMP, ADP, ATP, F6P, FBP, PEP, and citrate. This body of work provides fresh insights into the mechanism, specificity and regulation of sulfoglycolysis and has important implications for understanding how this biochemistry interfaces with central metabolism in prokaryotes to process this major repository of biogeochemical sulfur.

Two independent evolutionary routes to Na+/H+ cotransport function in membrane pyrophosphatases

Membrane-bound pyrophosphatases (mPPases) hydrolyze pyrophosphate (PPi) to transport H+, Na+ or both and help organisms to cope with stress conditions, such as high salinity or limiting nutrients. Recent elucidation of mPPase structure and identification of subfamilies that have fully or partially switched from Na+ to H+ pumping have established mPPases as versatile models for studying the principles governing the mechanism, specificity and evolution of cation transporters. In the present study, we constructed an accurate phylogenetic map of the interface of Na+-transporting PPases (Na+-PPases) and Na+- and H+-transporting PPases (Na+,H+-PPases), which guided our experimental exploration of the variations in PPi hydrolysis and ion transport activities during evolution. Surprisingly, we identified two mPPase lineages that independently acquired physiologically significant Na+ and H+ cotransport function. Na+,H+-PPases of the first lineage transport H+ over an extended [Na+] range, but progressively lose H+ transport efficiency at high [Na+]. In contrast, H+-transport by Na+,H+-PPases of the second lineage is not inhibited by up to 100 mM Na+. With the identification of Na+,H+-PPase subtypes, the mPPases protein superfamily appears as a continuum, ranging from monospecific Na+ transporters to transporters with tunable levels of Na+ and H+ cotransport and further to monospecific H+ transporters. Our results lend credence to the concept that Na+ and H+ are transported by similar mechanisms, allowing the relative efficiencies of Na+ and H+ transport to be modulated by minor changes in protein structure during the course of adaptation to a changing environment.

An enzyme family reunion — similarities, differences and eccentricities in actions on α-glucans

Abstractα-Glucans in general, including starch, glycogen and their derived oligosaccharides are processed by a host of more or less closely related enzymes that represent wide diversity in structure, mechanism, specificity and biological role. Sophisticated three-dimensional structures continue to emerge hand-in-hand with the gaining of novel insight in modes of action. We are witnessing the “test of time” blending with remaining questions and new relationships for these enzymes. Information from both within and outside of ALAMY_3 Symposium will provide examples on what the family contains and outline some future directions. In 2007 a quantum leap crowned the structural biology by the glucansucrase crystal structure. This initiates the disclosure of the mystery on the organisation of the multidomain structure and the “robotics mechanism” of this group of enzymes. The central issue on architecture and domain interplay in multidomain enzymes is also relevant in connection with the recent focus on carbohydrate-binding domains as well as on surface binding sites and their long underrated potential. Other questions include, how different or similar are glycoside hydrolase families 13 and 31 and is the lid finally lifted off the disguise of the starch lyase, also belonging to family 31? Is family 57 holding back secret specificities? Will the different families be sporting new “eccentric” functions, are there new families out there, and why are crystal structures of “simple” enzymes still missing? Indeed new understanding and discovery of biological roles continuously emphasize value of the collections of enzyme models, sequences, and evolutionary trees which will also be enabling advancement in design for useful and novel applications.