hospital clinic
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

305
(FIVE YEARS 68)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Endocrine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bushra Shahida ◽  
Kleoniki Tsoumani ◽  
Tereza Planck ◽  
Vijayachitra Modhukur ◽  
Pernilla Asp ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Treatment of Graves´ disease (GD) with radioiodine increases the risk of developing Graves´ ophthalmopathy (GO), and the link between thyroid and orbital tissue may be the presence of TSH-receptors. Radioiodine increases the titers of TRAb and the aim was to investigate the relationship between GO and TRAb titers after treatment with radioiodine and to define the impact of risk genes. Methods GD patients without ophthalmopathy or previous treatment with radioiodine were prospectively included at treatment with radioiodine for hyperthyroidism. A follow-up was performed 1 year later for the registration of GO development. The study was performed at a University Hospital Clinic; a referral center of all patients treated with radioiodine in the south of Sweden. The main outcome measures were the development of TRAb, anti-TPO, and anti-TG after 3 months and GO after 12 months and relationship to the genetic background (HLA, CTLA-4, and CYR61). Results Three months of radioiodine TRAb titers increased in two thirds of patients (p < 0.0005) but not in the other third. Anti-TPO titers were associated with TRAb (R = 0.362, p < 0.0001) but not anti-TG. At follow-up 1 year later (n = 204) 32 patients developed GO with a proportion of 70% in the group increasing in TRAb titers and 30% in the group with unchanged or lower TRAb titers (p-value < 0.0005). Patients with GO had higher titers of TRAb than patients without GO. CTLA-4 (rs231775 SNP) was significantly (p < 0.005) associated with TRAb titers above the median three months after radioiodine. Conclusions The increase in TRAb titers after treatment with radioiodine is associated with GO and a genetic variation in CTLA-4 is associated with higher titers of TRAb.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e050826
Author(s):  
Ryan Essex ◽  
Sharon Marie Weldon ◽  
Trevor Thompson ◽  
Erika Kalocsanyiova ◽  
Paul McCrone ◽  
...  

IntroductionA strike is a collective, temporary and calculated action, which involves a temporary stoppage of work. For healthcare professionals strike action poses a unique dilemma. Perhaps most fundamentally, as strike action is designed to be disruptive it has the potential to impact the delivery of care and place patient well-being in jeopardy. The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate the impact of healthcare strike action on patient mortality outcomes globally using meta-analysis in order to provide a comprehensive evidence base that can advise healthcare professionals, governments and regulatory bodies on the impact that strike action has on patients.Methods and analysisA comprehensive literature search of major electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, BIOETHICSLINE, EconLit, WEB OF SCIENCE, OPEN GREY and SIGMA REPOSITORY) will be undertaken to identify observational studies of strike action among healthcare professionals where in-hospital/clinic and population/community mortality is examined, prestrike, during and poststrike. Meta-analysis will be performed to estimate in-hospital/clinic and population/community mortality during periods of strike action. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions tool.Ethics and disseminationThis study does not require ethical approval. Findings will be submitted to an appropriate peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberCRD42021238879.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 100656
Author(s):  
Karolina Leziak ◽  
Carly M. Dahl ◽  
Jenise A. Jackson ◽  
Emily S. Miller ◽  
Lynn M. Yee

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciara M. E. Daly ◽  
Lynette Loi ◽  
Jo Booth ◽  
Dalia Saidan ◽  
Karen Guerrero ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) has been used to treat overactive bladder (OAB), however patient experiences and views of this treatment are lacking. The aim of this study was to explore women’s experiences of OAB and TTNS treatment and the perceived factors influencing participation and adherence. Methods Semi-structured, individual interviews conducted as part of a mixed-methods, randomised, feasibility trial of self-managed versus HCP-led TTNS. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken using Booth et al. (Neurourol Urodynam. 2017;37:528–41) approach. Results 16 women were interviewed, 8 self-managing TTNS at home and 8 receiving TTNS in twice-weekly hospital clinic appointments. Women self-managing OAB considered TTNS easy to administer, flexible and favourably ‘convenient’, especially when the participant was bound by work and other life commitments. In contrast to OAB symptoms ‘dominating life’, self-managing bladder treatment was empowering and fitted around home life demands. Flexibility and control engendered by self-management, facilitated women’s willingness to participate in TTNS. Women attending a hospital clinic for TTNS enjoyed the social aspects but found the routine appointments constrained their lives. Motivation to continue TTNS in the longer term was dependent on perception of benefit. Conclusions This study provides novel insights into women’s experiences of self-managing their OAB using TTNS compared to HCP-led management in the clinical setting. It highlights positive experiences self-managing TTNS at home and a willingness to continue in the longer term, facilitated by ease of use and convenience. Trial Registration 1/11/2018: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03727711.


Oral Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Francesc Xavier Aviles Jurado ◽  
Isabel Vilaseca Gonzalez ◽  
Joan Remacha Sarda
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document