Limb Salvage in Poor-Risk Patients Using Transluminal Angioplasty

1983 ◽  
Vol 118 (10) ◽  
pp. 1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Rush
2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982094665
Author(s):  
Gabriela Teixeira ◽  
Paulo Almeida ◽  
Luís Loureiro ◽  
Inês Antunes ◽  
Duarte Rego ◽  
...  

Background: Hemodialysis access–induced distal ischemia consists of symptomatic extremity malperfusion after vascular access creation. It is usually caused by discordant vascular resistance, with arteriovenous shunting of a high blood volume from arterial into venous system and subsequent hand hypoperfusion. Less often, hemodialysis access–induced distal ischemia is caused by arterial stenosis. In these cases, access frequently has normal/low flow, radial pulse is usually absent and not recoverable with vascular access digital compression, diabetes is often present, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty can be critical for access and limb salvage. Methods: Retrospective study conducted between June 2011 and February 2018 of patients with vascular access submitted to arterial percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for limb-threatening ischemia. Results: Twenty-nine patients were referred for arterial angiography after hemodialysis access–induced distal ischemia diagnosis and physical examination or ultrasound findings suggestive of arterial disease. In 11 patients, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was not technically feasible. Among 18 treated patients, 83.3% had diabetes and 60% had skin ulcerations. Target arteries were radial (11), brachial (7), axillar (2), ulnar (2), and subclavian (1). Clinical success, defined as arteriovenous maintenance and wound healing/pain resolution, was observed in 12 patients (66.7%). Concomitant procedures included adjuvant banding ( n = 2) and finger amputation ( n = 1), and one reintervention was performed. No intra- or postoperative complications were reported. Conclusion: Hemodialysis access–induced distal ischemia is a serious complication of hemodialysis vascular access, with multifactorial etiology. Correct and timely diagnosis is crucial for maintaining access and limb salvage. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is a minimally invasive procedure that may be effective and long-lasting in carefully selected patients with ischemic complaints.


2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
L. Boyer ◽  
T. Therre ◽  
J. M. Garcier ◽  
N. Perez ◽  
A. Ravel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 569
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Soliman ◽  
AymanM Samir ◽  
Amro Elboushi ◽  
AsserA Goda ◽  
HosamA Tawfek

1985 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. 282
Author(s):  
A. Madjidi

Extensive experiments in animals and humans, as well as clinical experience in disaster areas, have shown that expensive devices and complicated inhalation narcotics are not suited for anesthesia under disaster conditions. Today, the most important drugs are intravenous and, in emergencies, also intramuscular preparations which do not cause any significant central respiratory depression:1. Ketamine, suited for routine anesthesia under disaster conditions; and2. Gamma-Hydroxy-Butyric-Acid (Somsanit), suited for poor risk patients with hypoxic injuries and/or shock.


2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Trocciola ◽  
Rabih Chaer ◽  
Rajeev Dayal ◽  
Stephanie C. Lin ◽  
Naveen Kumar ◽  
...  

This study analyzed clinical success, patency, and limb salvage after endovascular repair in patients treated for chronic limb ischemia presenting with claudication versus critical limb ischemia. Between October 2001 and August 2004, 115 patients (mean age 71) underwent endovascular treatment for infrainguinal arterial disease. Techniques included subintimal angioplasty and transluminal angioplasty with or without stents. Lesions were classified according to Transatlantic InterSociety Consensus. Follow-up (mean 11 months) included physical exam, ankle-brachial index, and duplex ultrasound. Patency rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank analysis. One hundred ninety-nine lesions were treated in 121 limbs using percutaneous techniques. Comorbidities were similar except higher rates of diabetes mellitus (67% vs 41%, P < 0.001) and chronic renal insufficiency (22% vs 7%, P < 0.05) were found in critical limb ischemia patients. Primary patency for claudicants was 100 per cent, 98 per cent, and 85 per cent at 3, 6, and 12 months and 89 per cent, 80 per cent, and 72 per cent for critical limb ischemia, respectively ( P = 0.06). Limb salvage was 91 per cent at 12 months for critical limb ischemia patients. Morbidity was similar between groups, and there was no perioperative mortality. Percutaneous intervention for both claudication and critical limb ischemia provides acceptable 12-month patency with limited morbidity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah G. Oliver ◽  
John S. Steinberg ◽  
Kelly Powers ◽  
Karen K. Evans ◽  
Paul J. Kim ◽  
...  

Partial calcanectomy (PC) is an established limb salvage procedure for treatment of deep heel ulceration with concomitant calcaneal osteomyelitis. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between the amount of calcaneus removed during PC and the resulting lower extremity function and limb salvage outcomes. Consecutive PC patients were retrospectively divided into two cohorts defined by the amount of calcaneus resected before wound closure: patients in cohort 1 retained = 50% of calcaneus, while patients in cohort 2 underwent resection of >50% of the calcaneus. The Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) was used to assess postoperative lower extremity function. The average amount of calcaneus resected was 13% ± 9.2 (1–39%) and 74% ± 19.5 (51–100) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (P<0.0001). Below knee amputation was performed in 7 (28%) and 5 (29%) of subjects in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (P=1.0). The average LEFS score was 33.9 ± 15.0 for subjects in cohort 1 and 36.2 ± 19.9 for the subjects cohort 2 (P=0.8257) which correlates to “moderate to quite a bit of difficulty.” Our study suggests that regardless of the amount of calcaneus resected, PC provides a viable treatment option for high-risk patients with calcaneal osteomyelitis.


ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e000798
Author(s):  
Sahra Ali ◽  
Jorge Camarero ◽  
Paula van Hennik ◽  
Bjorg Bolstad ◽  
Maja Sommerfelt Grønvold ◽  
...  

On the 15 November 2018, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use adopted an extension to an existing indication for the use of nivolumab (Opdivo) in combination with ipilimumab (Yervoy) for the first-line treatment of adult patients with intermediate/poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The approval was based on results from the Pivotal CA209214 study, a randomised, open-label, phase III study, comparing nivolumab +ipilimumab with sunitinib in subjects≥18 years of age with previously untreated advanced RCC (not amenable for surgery or radiotherapy) or metastatic RCC, with a clear-cell component. A total of 1096 patients were randomised in the trial, of which 847 patients had intermediate/poor-risk RCC and received either nivolumab (n=425) in combination with ipilimumab administered every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or sunitinib (n=422) administered orally for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off, every cycle. A statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group compared with the sunitinib group in intermediate/poor-risk subjects (HR 0.63 (99.8% CI 0.44 to 0.89); stratified log-rank 2-sided p-value<0.0001). The median OS was not reached for the nivolumab + ipilimumab group and was 25.95 months for the sunitinib group. The OS rates were 89.5% and 86.2% at 6 months, and 80.1% and 72.1% at 12 months in the nivolumab +ipilimumab and the sunitinib groups, respectively. K-M curves separated after approximately 3 months, favouring nivolumab + ipilimumab. This was not mirrored in the favourable-risk patients where no statistically significant difference was observed between nivolumab + ipilimumab and sunitinib in favourable-risk patients (HR 1.45 (descriptive 99.8% CI 0.51 to 4.12), p =0.2715).


1985 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 977-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
E T Creagan ◽  
D L Ahmann ◽  
S J Green ◽  
H J Long ◽  
S Frytak ◽  
...  

Thirty-five eligible patients with disseminated malignant melanoma received intramuscular recombinant leukocyte interferon (IFN-rA), 50 X 10(6) U/m2 three times weekly (TIW) for an intended duration of 12 weeks concomitant with daily oral cimetidine, 1,200 mg/d in four divided doses. For all study participants, the median survival time was six months. Among 21 "good risk" patients (performance score [PS] 0, 1 and no prior chemotherapy), we observed seven partial regressions (33%). Six patients had stability of disease (29%), seven had immediate disease progression, and one discontinued treatment after two doses without tumor evaluation due to side effects. Times to disease progression of five patients with regressions of soft-tissue disease were 2.1, 3.3, 3.5, 3.7, and 4.3 months. Two patients had partial regressions of lung nodules for 2.0 and 3.8 months. We observed one regression among 14 "poor risk" patients (PS 2, 3, or prior chemotherapy). A 46-year-old woman with prior treatment had a partial regression of soft-tissue disease for 4.1 months. Four "poor risk" patients achieved disease stability, and nine progressed immediately. Leukopenia (WBC count less than 4,100/microL) affected 21 (66%) of 32 patients with WBC count data. The median count was 3,100/microL; range, 1,300 to 8,400/microL. We detected two cases of mild thrombocytopenia (100,000 and 120,000/microL). Other noteworthy toxicities included moderate-to-severe nausea (34%), anorexia (63%), and fatigue (80%). All patients experienced myalgias. Twenty patients had dosage decreases during the first cycle, and 14 of the 16 patients remaining on study after the first cycle required dosage reductions. The overall response rate is similar to our prior studies with IFN-rA as a single agent using TIW doses of 50 X 10(6) U/m2 and 12 X 10(6) U/m2 among 31 and 30 patients, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document