Antimicrobial Photodynamic Activity of Cationic Nanoparticles Decorated with Glycosylated Photosensitizers for Water Disinfection

ChemPhotoChem ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 596-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucía Fernández ◽  
Zhi Lin ◽  
Rudolf J. Schneider ◽  
Valdemar I. Esteves ◽  
Ângela Cunha ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (04n05) ◽  
pp. 574-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla M.B. Carvalho ◽  
João P.C. Tomé ◽  
Maria A.F. Faustino ◽  
Maria G.P.M.S. Neves ◽  
Augusto C. Tomé ◽  
...  

In this highlight an overview of the advances performed by the Aveiro group on the design and synthesis of tetrapyrrolic photosensitizers with potential photodynamic antimicrobial activity is presented.


ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla M. B. Carvalho ◽  
Joao P. C. Tome ◽  
Maria A. F. Faustino ◽  
Maria G. P. M. S. Neves ◽  
Augusto C. Tome ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Byunghee Hwang ◽  
Tae-Il Kim ◽  
Hyunjin Kim ◽  
Sungjin Jeon ◽  
Yongdoo Choi ◽  
...  

A ubiquinone-BODIPY photosensitizer self-assembles into nanoparticles (PS-Q-NPs) and undergoes selective activation within the highly reductive intracellular environment of tumors, resulting in “turn-on” fluorescence and photosensitizing activities.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nusa Idaman Said

Water disinfection means the removal, deactivation or killing of pathogenic microorganisms. Microorganisms are destroyed or deactivated, resulting in termination of growth and reproduction. When microorganisms are not removed from drinking water, drinking water usage will cause people to fall ill. Chemical inactivation of microbiological contamination in natural or untreated water is usually one of the final steps to reduce pathogenic microorganisms in drinking water. Combinations of water purification steps (oxidation, coagulation, settling, disinfection, and filtration) cause (drinking) water to be safe after production. As an extra measure many countries apply a second disinfection step at the end of the water purification process, in order to protect the water from microbiological contamination in the water distribution system. Usually one uses a different kind of disinfectant from the one earlier in the process, during this disinfection process. The secondary disinfection makes sure that bacteria will not multiply in the water during distribution. This paper describes several technique of disinfection process for drinking water treatment. Disinfection can be attained by means of physical or chemical disinfectants. The agents also remove organic contaminants from water, which serve as nutrients or shelters for microorganisms. Disinfectants should not only kill microorganisms. Disinfectants must also have a residual effect, which means that they remain active in the water after disinfection. For chemical disinfection of water the following disinfectants can be used such as Chlorine (Cl2),  Hypo chlorite (OCl-), Chloramines, Chlorine dioxide (ClO2), Ozone (O3), Hydrogen peroxide etch. For physical disinfection of water the following disinfectants can be used is Ultraviolet light (UV). Every technique has its specific advantages and and disadvantages its own application area sucs as environmentally friendly, disinfection byproducts, effectivity, investment, operational costs etc. Kata Kunci : Disinfeksi, bakteria, virus, air minum, khlor, hip khlorit, khloramine, khlor dioksida, ozon, UV.


2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Wojcicka ◽  
Carole Baxter ◽  
Ron Hofmann

Abstract Microorganisms have been shown to survive drinking water disinfection and remain viable in disinfected waters despite the presence of disinfectant residuals. This may be partially attributed to protection by particulate matter. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the presence of particulate matter on disinfection kinetics. Sphingomonas paucimobilis ATCC 10829 and Helicobacter pylori ATCC 43504 were used in inactivation experiments in the presence and absence of soil, corrosion, and wastewater particles. The results showed that the presence of such particles tended to inhibit chlorine and monochloramine inactivation, although the magnitude of the impact under the conditions tested was small (e.g., 1-log reduction in inactivation for several minutes of contact time in the presence of less than 1 mg/L of disinfectant).


2021 ◽  
pp. 126617
Author(s):  
Rohit Kumar ◽  
Pankaj Raizada ◽  
Narinder Verma ◽  
Ahmad Hosseini-Bandegharaei ◽  
Vijay Kumar Thakur ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 381-404
Author(s):  
Prachi Upadhyay ◽  
Sankar Chakma
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 ◽  
pp. 112410
Author(s):  
A. Sofia G.G. Santos ◽  
Patrícia S.F. Ramalho ◽  
A.T. Viana ◽  
A.R. Lopes ◽  
Alexandra G. Gonçalves ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document