[ 18 F] labeled PET ligand for the histamine H4 receptor

Author(s):  
Agnieszka Zak ◽  
Lucas Lemaire ◽  
Sylvie Chalon ◽  
Gabrielle Chicheri ◽  
Hamid Marzag ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 1663-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Fidelis Correa ◽  
Joao Paulo dos Santos Fernandes

2020 ◽  
Vol 373 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Schirmer ◽  
Luisa Lindemann ◽  
Kaya Saskia Bittkau ◽  
Rukijat Isaev ◽  
Daniela Bösche ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 173 (3) ◽  
pp. 2078-2083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Nakayama ◽  
Yoshiko Kato ◽  
Kunio Hieshima ◽  
Daisuke Nagakubo ◽  
Yuichi Kunori ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 6116
Author(s):  
Bastian Schirmer ◽  
Detlef Neumann

Histamine is a pleiotropic mediator involved in a broad spectrum of (patho)-physiological processes, one of which is the regulation of inflammation. Compounds acting on three out of the four known histamine receptors are approved for clinical use. These approved compounds comprise histamine H1-receptor (H1R) antagonists, which are used to control allergic inflammation, antagonists at H2R, which therapeutically decrease gastric acid release, and an antagonist at H3R, which is indicated to treat narcolepsy. Ligands at H4R are still being tested pre-clinically and in clinical trials of inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, dermatitis, and psoriasis. These trials, however, documented only moderate beneficial effects of H4R ligands so far. Nevertheless, pre-clinically, H4R still is subject of ongoing research, analyzing various inflammatory, allergic, and autoimmune diseases. During inflammatory reactions in gut tissues, histamine concentrations rise in affected areas, indicating its possible biological effect. Indeed, in histamine-deficient mice experimentally induced inflammation of the gut is reduced in comparison to that in histamine-competent mice. However, antagonists at H1R, H2R, and H3R do not provide an effect on inflammation, supporting the idea that H4R is responsible for the histamine effects. In the present review, we discuss the involvement of histamine and H4R in inflammatory and inflammation-associated diseases of the gut.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 386-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Ying Ma ◽  
Sandra Snook ◽  
Sheryl Garrovillo ◽  
Charles Johnson ◽  
David La

Immunohistochemical staining for the lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP-2) has been proposed previously as an alternative to electron microscopy to identify hepatic phospholipidosis. This study used LAMP-2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) to diagnose phospholipidosis in rats exhibiting renal tubular injury. Rats were administered toreforant, a histamine H4 receptor antagonist by oral gavage at a dose of 3, 10, or 100 mg/kg/d for 6 months. Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed renal tubular epithelial cell vacuolation, hypertrophy, degeneration, and luminal dilation in the 100 mg/kg/d group animals. Renal tubular injury was confirmed using kidney injury marker 1 (KIM-1) IHC. The involvement of phosopholipidosis in the renal injury was investigated by LAMP-2. Adipophilin IHC was included to differentiate phospholipidosis from lipidosis. Increased LAMP-2 staining was observed in the 100 mg/kg/d group animals when compared to vehicle group animals. Lysosome-associated membrane protein-2 staining was most prominent in the outer stripe of the outer medulla where KIM-1 staining was also most prominent. By contrast, adipophilin staining was not increased. Phospholipidosis was also confirmed by electron microscopy. These data support the use of LAMP-2 IHC as a diagnostic tool and suggest an association between phospholipidosis and the renal tubular injury caused by toreforant.


Author(s):  
Yoshiki Shiraishi ◽  
Katsuyuki Takeda ◽  
Yi Jia ◽  
Joanne Domenico ◽  
Robin L. Thurmond ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document