scholarly journals The association between stratospheric weak polar vortex events and cold air outbreaks in the Northern Hemisphere

2010 ◽  
Vol 136 (649) ◽  
pp. 886-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik W. Kolstad ◽  
Tarjei Breiteig ◽  
Adam A. Scaife
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Cold Air Outbreaks

scholarly journals Northern hemisphere cold air outbreaks are more likely to be severe during weak polar vortex conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlong Huang ◽  
Peter Hitchcock ◽  
Amanda C. Maycock ◽  
Christine M. McKenna ◽  
Wenshou Tian
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Energy Use ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Anomalous Behavior ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Air Mass ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Cold Air Outbreaks

AbstractSevere cold air outbreaks have significant impacts on human health, energy use, agriculture, and transportation. Anomalous behavior of the Arctic stratospheric polar vortex provides an important source of subseasonal-to-seasonal predictability of Northern Hemisphere cold air outbreaks. Here, through reanalysis data for the period 1958–2019 and climate model simulations for preindustrial conditions, we show that weak stratospheric polar vortex conditions increase the risk of severe cold air outbreaks in mid-latitude East Asia by 100%, in contrast to only 40% for moderate cold air outbreaks. Such a disproportionate increase is also found in Europe, with an elevated risk persisting more than three weeks. By analysing the stream of polar cold air mass, we show that the polar vortex affects severe cold air outbreaks by modifying the inter-hemispheric transport of cold air mass. Using a novel method to assess Granger causality, we show that the polar vortex provides predictive information regarding severe cold air outbreaks over multiple regions in the Northern Hemisphere, which may help with mitigating their impact.

scholarly journals Eurasian Cold Air Outbreaks under Different Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex Strengths

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 1245-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlong Huang ◽  
Wenshou Tian
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Sensible Heat Flux ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Northern Eurasia ◽  
Reanalysis Dataset ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Cold Air Outbreaks

Abstract This study analyzes the differences and similarities of Eurasian cold air outbreaks (CAOs) under the weak (CAOW), strong (CAOS), and neutral (CAON) stratospheric polar vortex states and examines the potential links between the polar vortex and Eurasian CAOs. The results indicate that the colder surface air temperature (SAT) over Europe in the earlier stages of CAOW events is likely because the amplitude of the preexisting negative North Atlantic Oscillation pattern is larger in CAOW events than in CAON and CAOS events. Marked by the considerably negative stratospheric Arctic Oscillation signals entering the troposphere, the SAT at midlatitudes over eastern Eurasia in CAOW events is colder than in CAON events. A larger diabatic heating rate related to a positive sensible heat flux anomaly in CAOW events likely offsets, to some degree, the cooling effect caused by the stronger cold advection and makes the differences in area-averaged SAT anomalies over northern Eurasia between the CAOW and CAON events look insignificant in most stages. Massive anomalous waves from the low-latitude western Pacific merge over northeastern Eurasia, then weaken the westerly wind over this region to create favorable conditions for southward advection of cold air masses in the earlier stages of all three types of CAOs. This study further analyzes the interannual relationship between the stratospheric polar vortex strength and the intensity of Eurasian CAOs and finds that climate models participating in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) relative to the reanalysis dataset tend to underestimate the correlation between them. The relationship between them is strengthening under representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) and 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenarios over the period 2006–60. In addition, the intensity of Eurasian CAOs exhibits a decreasing trend in the past and in the future.

scholarly journals What Is the Polar Vortex and How Does It Influence Weather?

2017 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryn W. Waugh ◽  
Adam H. Sobel ◽  
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Keyword(s):  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Extreme Weather ◽  
Extreme Weather Events ◽  
Science Literature ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Weather Events ◽  
Science Community ◽  
The Media ◽  
Cold Air Outbreaks

Abstract The term polar vortex has become part of the everyday vocabulary, but there is some confusion in the media, general public, and science community regarding what polar vortices are and how they are related to various weather events. Here, we clarify what is meant by polar vortices in the atmospheric science literature. It is important to recognize the existence of two separate planetary-scale circumpolar vortices: one in the stratosphere and the other in the troposphere. These vortices have different structures, seasonality, dynamics, and impacts on extreme weather. The tropospheric vortex is much larger than its stratospheric counterpart and exists year-round, whereas the stratospheric polar vortex forms in fall but disappears in the spring of each year. Both vortices can, in some circumstances, play a role in extreme weather events at the surface, such as cold-air outbreaks, but these events are not the consequence of either the existence or gross properties of these two vortices. Rather, cold-air outbreaks are most directly related to transient, localized displacements of the edge of the tropospheric polar vortex that may, in some circumstances, be related to the stratospheric polar vortex, but there is no known one-to-one connection between these phenomena.

Stratospheric modulation of cold air outbreaks and winter storms in the North Atlantic region and impacts on predictability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilla Afargan-Gerstman ◽  
Iuliia Polkova ◽  
Lukas Papritz ◽  
Paolo Ruggieri ◽  
Martin P. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Atlantic ◽  
Storm Track ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Damage Potential ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Winter Storms ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
The North ◽  
Cold Air Outbreaks

<div> <p>Variability of the stratospheric polar vortex has the potential to influence surface weather by imposing negative North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) conditions, associated with cold air outbreaks in the Arctic and a southward shift of the extratropical storm track. In particular, the likelihood of cold temperature extremes over the ocean, known as marine cold air outbreaks (MCAOs), have been associated with a range of hazardous conditions, including strong surface winds and the occurrence of extreme cyclones known as Polar Lows (PLs), posing risks for Arctic marine activity and infrastructure. Likewise, winter storms can lead to high damage potential in the extratropics due to their associated extreme winds.</p> </div><div> <p>Skillful predictions of MCAOs and extratropical winter storms on subseasonal timescales have been linked to the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex. Using ERA-Interim reanalysis (1979-2019) and ECMWF forecasts from the S2S Prediction Project database we investigate the stratospheric influence on surface extremes such as MCAOs and high-impact winter storms. Following weak stratospheric vortex extremes, anomalous circulation patterns accompanied by increased storminess over the eastern North Atlantic are found to be strong indicators for enhanced MCAOs in high- and mid-latitudes. Understanding the role of the stratosphere in subseasonal variability and predictability of cold air outbreaks and storm tracks during winter can provide a key for a reliable forecast of severe impacts.</p> </div>

scholarly journals Stratospheric influence on marine cold air outbreaks in the Barents Sea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilla Afargan-Gerstman ◽  
Iuliia Polkova ◽  
Lukas Papritz ◽  
Paolo Ruggieri ◽  
Martin P. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Norwegian Sea ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Strong Surface ◽  
Dipole Pattern ◽  
Cold Air Outbreaks

Abstract. Marine cold air outbreaks (MCAOs) in the Arctic are associated with a range of severe weather phenomena, such as polar lows, strong surface winds and intense cooling of the ocean surface. While MCAO frequency has been linked to the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex, a connection to the occurrence of extreme stratospheric events, known as sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), has dominantly been investigated with respect to cold extremes over land. Here, the influence of SSW events on MCAOs in the Barents Sea is studied using observational and reanalysis datasets. Overall, more than a half of SSW events lead to more frequent MCAOs in the Barents Sea. SSW events with an enhanced MCAO response in the Barents Sea are associated with a ridge over Greenland and a trough over Scandinavia, leading to an anomalous dipole pattern of 500-hPa geopotential height and strong northerly flow over the Norwegian Sea. As SSW events tend to have a long-term influence on surface weather, these results can shed light on the predictability of MCAOs in the Arctic for winters with SSW events.

Comparison of Key Characteristics of Remarkable SSW Events in the Southern and Northern Hemisphere

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Kozubek ◽  
Peter Krizan
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Wave Number ◽  
Strong Activity ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Zonal Wave Number ◽  
Show Difference ◽  
Temperature Enhancement ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave

<p>An exceptionally strong sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during September 2019 was observed. Because SSW in the SH is very rare, comparison with the only recorded major SH SSW is done. According to World Meteorological Organization (WMO) definition, the SSW in 2019 has to be classified as minor. The cause of SSW in 2002 was very strong activity of stationary planetary wave with zonal wave-number (ZW) 2, which reached its maximum when the polar vortex split into two circulations with polar temperature enhancement by 30 K/week and it penetrated deeply to the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere. On the other hand, the minor SSW in 2019 involved an exceptionally strong wave-1 planetary wave and a large polar temperature enhancement by 50.8 K/week, but it affected mainly the middle and upper stratosphere. The strongest SSW in the Northern Hemisphere was observed in 2009. This study provides comparison of two strongest SSW in the SH and the strongest SSW in the NH to show difference between two hemispheres and possible impact to the lower or higher layers.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document