Membrane-induced alterations in HIV-1 gag and matrix protein-protein interactions

1998 ◽  
Vol 277 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Scarlata ◽  
L.S Ehrlich ◽  
C.A Carter
2016 ◽  
Vol 90 (9) ◽  
pp. 4544-4555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilia Barros ◽  
Frank Heinrich ◽  
Siddhartha A. K. Datta ◽  
Alan Rein ◽  
Ioannis Karageorgos ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBy assembling in a protein lattice on the host's plasma membrane, the retroviral Gag polyprotein triggers formation of the viral protein/membrane shell. The MA domain of Gag employs multiple signals—electrostatic, hydrophobic, and lipid-specific—to bring the protein to the plasma membrane, thereby complementing protein-protein interactions, located in full-length Gag, in lattice formation. We report the interaction of myristoylated and unmyristoylated HIV-1 Gag MA domains with bilayers composed of purified lipid components to dissect these complex membrane signals and quantify their contributions to the overall interaction. Surface plasmon resonance on well-defined planar membrane models is used to quantify binding affinities and amounts of protein and yields free binding energy contributions, ΔG, of the various signals. Charge-charge interactions in the absence of the phosphatidylinositide PI(4,5)P2attract the protein to acidic membrane surfaces, and myristoylation increases the affinity by a factor of 10; thus, our data do not provide evidence for a PI(4,5)P2trigger of myristate exposure. Lipid-specific interactions with PI(4,5)P2, the major signal lipid in the inner plasma membrane, increase membrane attraction at a level similar to that of protein lipidation. While cholesterol does not directly engage in interactions, it augments protein affinity strongly by facilitating efficient myristate insertion and PI(4,5)P2binding. We thus observe that the isolated MA protein, in the absence of protein-protein interaction conferred by the full-length Gag, binds the membrane with submicromolar affinities.IMPORTANCELike other retroviral species, the Gag polyprotein of HIV-1 contains three major domains: the N-terminal, myristoylated MA domain that targets the protein to the plasma membrane of the host; a central capsid-forming domain; and the C-terminal, genome-binding nucleocapsid domain. These domains act in concert to condense Gag into a membrane-bounded protein lattice that recruits genomic RNA into the virus and forms the shell of a budding immature viral capsid. In binding studies of HIV-1 Gag MA to model membranes with well-controlled lipid composition, we dissect the multiple interactions of the MA domain with its target membrane. This results in a detailed understanding of the thermodynamic aspects that determine membrane association, preferential lipid recruitment to the viral shell, and those aspects of Gag assembly into the membrane-bound protein lattice that are determined by MA.


2008 ◽  
Vol 412 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Herschhorn ◽  
Iris Oz-Gleenberg ◽  
Amnon Hizi

The RT (reverse transcriptase) of HIV-1 interacts with HIV-1 IN (integrase) and inhibits its enzymatic activities. However, the molecular mechanisms underling these interactions are not well understood. In order to study these mechanisms, we have analysed the interactions of HIV-1 IN with HIV-1 RT and with two other related RTs: those of HIV-2 and MLV (murine-leukaemia virus). All three RTs inhibited HIV-1 IN, albeit to a different extent, suggesting a common site of binding that could be slightly modified for each one of the studied RTs. Using surface plasmon resonance technology, which monitors direct protein–protein interactions, we performed kinetic analyses of the binding of HIV-1 IN to these three RTs and observed interesting binding patterns. The interaction of HIV-1 RT with HIV-1 IN was unique and followed a two-state reaction model. According to this model, the initial IN–RT complex formation was followed by a conformational change in the complex that led to an elevation of the total affinity between these two proteins. In contrast, HIV-2 and MLV RTs interacted with IN in a simple bi-molecular manner, without any apparent secondary conformational changes. Interestingly, HIV-1 and HIV-2 RTs were the most efficient inhibitors of HIV-1 IN activity, whereas HIV-1 and MLV RTs showed the highest affinity towards HIV-1 IN. These modes of direct protein interactions, along with the apparent rate constants calculated and the correlations of the interaction kinetics with the capacity of the RTs to inhibit IN activities, are all discussed.


FEBS Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 279 (16) ◽  
pp. 2795-2809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Maes ◽  
Abraham Loyter ◽  
Assaf Friedler

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (20) ◽  
pp. eaba3418
Author(s):  
Huaibing Jin ◽  
Zhiqiang Du ◽  
Yanjing Zhang ◽  
Judit Antal ◽  
Zongliang Xia ◽  
...  

Many animal viral proteins, e.g., Vpr of HIV-1, disrupt host mitosis by directly interrupting the mitotic entry switch Wee1-Cdc25-Cdk1. However, it is unknown whether plant viruses may use this mechanism in their pathogenesis. Here, we report that the 17K protein, encoded by barley yellow dwarf viruses and related poleroviruses, delays G2/M transition and disrupts mitosis in both host (barley) and nonhost (fission yeast, Arabidopsis thaliana, and tobacco) cells through interrupting the function of Wee1-Cdc25-CDKA/Cdc2 via direct protein-protein interactions and alteration of CDKA/Cdc2 phosphorylation. When ectopically expressed, 17K disrupts the mitosis of cultured human cells, and HIV-1 Vpr inhibits plant cell growth. Furthermore, 17K and Vpr share similar secondary structural feature and common amino acid residues required for interacting with plant CDKA. Thus, our work reveals a distinct class of mitosis regulators that are conserved between plant and animal viruses and play active roles in viral pathogenesis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Jason Ejimogu ◽  
Connor Parker ◽  
Mahlet Bauerle ◽  
Cheyenne Palm ◽  
Janae Baptiste Brown ◽  
...  

ChemMedChem ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1311-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura De Luca ◽  
Maria Letizia Barreca ◽  
Stefania Ferro ◽  
Frauke Christ ◽  
Nunzio Iraci ◽  
...  

Biochemistry ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 30 (50) ◽  
pp. 11707-11719 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Patricia Becerra ◽  
Amalendra Kumar ◽  
Marc S. Lewis ◽  
Steven G. Widen ◽  
John Abbotts ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 408 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
YanMing Zou ◽  
HongJun Wang ◽  
Jason L. Shapiro ◽  
Curtis T. Okamoto ◽  
Steven J. Brookes ◽  
...  

The enamel matrix protein amelogenin is secreted by ameloblasts into the extracellular space to guide the formation of highly ordered hydroxyapatite mineral crystallites, and, subsequently, is almost completely removed during mineral maturation. Amelogenin interacts with the transmembrane proteins CD63 and LAMP (lysosome-associated membrane protein) 1, which are involved in endocytosis. Exogenously added amelogenin has been observed to move rapidly into CD63/LAMP1-positive vesicles in cultured cells. In the present study, we demonstrate the protein region defined by amino acid residues 103–205 for CD63 interacts not only with amelogenin, but also with other enamel matrix proteins (ameloblastin and enamelin). A detailed characterization of binding regions in amelogenin, CD63 and LAMP1 reveals that the amelogenin region defined by residues PLSPILPELPLEAW is responsible for the interaction with CD63 through residues 165–205, with LAMP1 through residues 226–251, and with the related LAMP2 protein through residues 227–259. We predict that the amelogenin binding region is: (i) hydrophobic; (ii) largely disordered; and (iii) accessible to the external environment. In contrast, the binding region of CD63 is likely to be organized in a ‘7’ shape within the mushroom-like structure of CD63 EC2 (extracellular domain 2). In vivo, the protein interactions between the secreted enamel matrix proteins with the membrane-bound proteins are likely to occur at the specialized secretory surfaces of ameloblast cells called Tomes' processes. Such protein–protein interactions may be required to establish short-term order of the forming matrix and/or to mediate feedback signals to the transcriptional machinery of ameloblasts and/or to remove matrix protein debris during enamel biomineralization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document