scholarly journals A Surprising Role for Conformational Entropy in Protein Function

2013 ◽  
pp. 69-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Joshua Wand ◽  
Veronica R. Moorman ◽  
Kyle W. Harpole
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Conformational Entropy

scholarly journals Motion and Conformational Entropy in Protein Function: Creation of an NMR-Based Entropy Meter

2015 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 60a
Author(s):  
Vignesh Kasinath ◽  
Kyle W. Harpole ◽  
Veronica R. Moorman ◽  
Kathleen G. Valentine ◽  
Kendra K. Frederick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Conformational Entropy

scholarly journals Protein conformational entropy is not slaved to water

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan S. Marques ◽  
Matthew A. Stetz ◽  
Christine Jorge ◽  
Kathleen G. Valentine ◽  
A. Joshua Wand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Hydration Shell ◽  
Nmr Relaxation ◽  
Bulk Water ◽  
Side Chain ◽  
Conformational Entropy ◽  
Solvent Water ◽  
Protein Molecules ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Internal Side

Abstract Conformational entropy can be an important element of the thermodynamics of protein functions such as the binding of ligands. The observed role for conformational entropy in modulating molecular recognition by proteins is in opposition to an often-invoked theory for the interaction of protein molecules with solvent water. The “solvent slaving” model predicts that protein motion is strongly coupled to various aspects of water such as bulk solvent viscosity and local hydration shell dynamics. Changes in conformational entropy are manifested in alterations of fast internal side chain motion that is detectable by NMR relaxation. We show here that the fast-internal side chain dynamics of several proteins are unaffected by changes to the hydration layer and bulk water. These observations indicate that the participation of conformational entropy in protein function is not dictated by the interaction of protein molecules and solvent water under the range of conditions normally encountered.

scholarly journals Structural origins of protein conformational entropy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José A. Caro ◽  
Kathleen G. Valentine ◽  
A. Joshua Wand
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Nmr Relaxation ◽  
Internal Motion ◽  
Side Chains ◽  
Conformational Entropy ◽  
Relaxation Methods ◽  
Detailed Structural Analysis ◽  
Packing Defects ◽  
Single Water Molecule

AbstractThe thermodynamics of molecular recognition by proteins is a central determinant of complex biochemistry. For over a half-century detailed cryogenic structures have provided deep insight into the energetic contributions to ligand binding by proteins1. More recently, a dynamical proxy based on NMR-relaxation methods has revealed an unexpected richness in the contributions of conformational entropy to the thermodynamics of ligand binding2,3,4,5. There remains, however, a discomforting absence of an understanding of the structural origins of fast internal motion and the conformational entropy that this motion represents. Here we report the pressure-dependence of fast internal motion within the ribonuclease barnase and its complex with the protein barstar. Distinctive clustering of the pressure sensitivity correlates with the presence of small packing defects or voids surrounding affected side chains. Prompted by this observation, we performed an analysis of the voids surrounding over 2,500 methyl-bearing side chains having experimentally determined order parameters. We find that changes in unoccupied volume as small as a single water molecule surrounding buried side chains greatly affects motion on the subnanosecond timescale. The discovered relationship begins to permit construction of a united view of the relationship between changes in the internal energy, as exposed by detailed structural analysis, and the conformational entropy, as represented by fast internal motion, in the thermodynamics of protein function.

scholarly journals Measuring Entropy in Molecular Recognition by Proteins

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Joshua Wand ◽  
Kim A. Sharp
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Recognition ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Conformational Entropy ◽  
Protein Ligand Interactions ◽  
Relaxation Measurements ◽  
Ligand Interactions ◽  
Resonance Relaxation ◽  
Translational Entropy ◽  
Side Chain Motion

Molecular recognition by proteins is fundamental to the molecular basis of biology. Dissection of the thermodynamic landscape governing protein–ligand interactions has proven difficult because determination of various entropic contributions is quite challenging. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements, theory, and simulations suggest that conformational entropy can be accessed through a dynamical proxy. Here, we review the relationship between measures of fast side-chain motion and the underlying conformational entropy. The dynamical proxy reveals that the contribution of conformational entropy can range from highly favorable to highly unfavorable and demonstrates the potential of this key thermodynamic variable to modulate protein–ligand interactions. The dynamical so-called entropy meter also refines the role of solvent entropy and directly determines the loss in rotational–translational entropy that occurs upon formation of high-affinity complexes. The ability to quantify the roles of entropy through an entropy meter based on measurable dynamical properties promises to highlight its role in protein function.

Reading the phosphorylation code: binding of the 14-3-3 protein to multivalent client phosphoproteins

2020 ◽  
Vol 477 (7) ◽  
pp. 1219-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolai N. Sluchanko
Keyword(s):  
Protein Function ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Major Protein ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Biochemical Journal ◽  
Multiple Binding ◽  
And Control

Many major protein–protein interaction networks are maintained by ‘hub’ proteins with multiple binding partners, where interactions are often facilitated by intrinsically disordered protein regions that undergo post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation. Phosphorylation can directly affect protein function and control recognition by proteins that ‘read’ the phosphorylation code, re-wiring the interactome. The eukaryotic 14-3-3 proteins recognizing multiple phosphoproteins nicely exemplify these concepts. Although recent studies established the biochemical and structural basis for the interaction of the 14-3-3 dimers with several phosphorylated clients, understanding their assembly with partners phosphorylated at multiple sites represents a challenge. Suboptimal sequence context around the phosphorylated residue may reduce binding affinity, resulting in quantitative differences for distinct phosphorylation sites, making hierarchy and priority in their binding rather uncertain. Recently, Stevers et al. [Biochemical Journal (2017) 474: 1273–1287] undertook a remarkable attempt to untangle the mechanism of 14-3-3 dimer binding to leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) that contains multiple candidate 14-3-3-binding sites and is mutated in Parkinson's disease. By using the protein-peptide binding approach, the authors systematically analyzed affinities for a set of LRRK2 phosphopeptides, alone or in combination, to a 14-3-3 protein and determined crystal structures for 14-3-3 complexes with selected phosphopeptides. This study addresses a long-standing question in the 14-3-3 biology, unearthing a range of important details that are relevant for understanding binding mechanisms of other polyvalent proteins.

The challenge of detecting modifications on proteins

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Elizabeth Smith ◽  
Adelina Rogowska-Wrzesinska
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Lysine Acetylation ◽  
Mass Determination ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
The Common

Abstract Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are integral to the regulation of protein function, characterising their role in this process is vital to understanding how cells work in both healthy and diseased states. Mass spectrometry (MS) facilitates the mass determination and sequencing of peptides, and thereby also the detection of site-specific PTMs. However, numerous challenges in this field continue to persist. The diverse chemical properties, low abundance, labile nature and instability of many PTMs, in combination with the more practical issues of compatibility with MS and bioinformatics challenges, contribute to the arduous nature of their analysis. In this review, we present an overview of the established MS-based approaches for analysing PTMs and the common complications associated with their investigation, including examples of specific challenges focusing on phosphorylation, lysine acetylation and redox modifications.

Spatial localization of unknown proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum predicts functions

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Michael D. Jain ◽  
Hisao Nagaya ◽  
Annalyn Gilchrist ◽  
Miroslaw Cygler ◽  
John J.M. Bergeron
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Folding ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Spatial Localization ◽  
Predict Protein Function ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Soluble Fractions ◽  
Er Membrane

Protein synthesis, folding and degradation functions are spatially segregated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with respect to the membrane and the ribosome (rough and smooth ER). Interrogation of a proteomics resource characterizing rough and smooth ER membranes subfractionated into cytosolic, membrane, and soluble fractions gives a spatial map of known proteins involved in ER function. The spatial localization of 224 identified unknown proteins in the ER is predicted to give insight into their function. Here we provide evidence that the proteomics resource accurately predicts the function of new proteins involved in protein synthesis (nudilin), protein translocation across the ER membrane (nicalin), co-translational protein folding (stexin), and distal protein folding in the lumen of the ER (erlin-1, TMX2). Proteomics provides the spatial localization of proteins and can be used to accurately predict protein function.

Understanding Conformational Entropy in Small Molecules

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucian Chan ◽  
Garrett Morris ◽  
Geoffrey Hutchison
Keyword(s):  
Small Molecules ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Standard Entropy ◽  
Free Energies ◽  
Conformational Entropy ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Empirical Corrections

The calculation of the entropy of flexible molecules can be challenging, since the number of possible conformers grows exponentially with molecule size and many low-energy conformers may be thermally accessible. Different methods have been proposed to approximate the contribution of conformational entropy to the molecular standard entropy, including performing thermochemistry calculations with all possible stable conformations, and developing empirical corrections from experimental data. We have performed conformer sampling on over 120,000 small molecules generating some 12 million conformers, to develop models to predict conformational entropy across a wide range of molecules. Using insight into the nature of conformational disorder, our cross-validated physically-motivated statistical model can outperform common machine learning and deep learning methods, with a mean absolute error ≈4.8 J/mol•K, or under 0.4 kcal/mol at 300 K. Beyond predicting molecular entropies and free energies, the model implies a high degree of correlation between torsions in most molecules, often as- sumed to be independent. While individual dihedral rotations may have low energetic barriers, the shape and chemical functionality of most molecules necessarily correlate their torsional degrees of freedom, and hence restrict the number of low-energy conformations immensely. Our simple models capture these correlations, and advance our understanding of small molecule conformational entropy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document