Mitigation of Salinity Hazard from Low Permeable Soil by Electrochemical Treatment: A Laboratory Based Investigation

Author(s):  
Mohammed Mustapha Bessaim ◽  
Hanifi Missoum ◽  
Karim Bendani ◽  
Mohamed Said Bekkouche
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
M.B. Nicodemus Ujih ◽  
Mohammad Isa Mohamadin ◽  
Milla-Armila Asli ◽  
Bebe Norlita Mohammed

Heavy metal ions contamination has become more serious which is caused by the releasing of toxic water from industrial area and landfill that are very harmful to all living organism especially human and can even cause death if contaminated in small amount of heavy metal concentration. Currently, peoples are using classic method namely electrochemical treatment, chemical oxidation/reduction, chemical precipitation and reverse osmosis to eliminate the metal ions from toxic water. Unfortunately, these methods are costly and not environmentally friendly as compared to bioadsorption method, where agricultural waste is used as biosorbent to remove heavy metals. Two types of agricultural waste used in this research namely oil palm mesocarp fiber (Elaesis guineensis sp.) (OPMF) and mangrove bark (Rhizophora apiculate sp.) (MB) biomass. Through chemical treatment, the removal efficiency was found to improve. The removal efficiency is examined based on four specification namely dosage, of biosorbent to adsorb four types of metals ion explicitly nickel, lead, copper, and chromium. The research has found that the removal efficiency of MB was lower than OPMF; whereas, the multiple metals ions removal efficiency decreased in the order of Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Ni2+ > Cr2+.


2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-346
Author(s):  
Viorica Iambartev ◽  
Gheorghe Duca ◽  
Maria Gonta ◽  
Vera Matveevici

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 813-817
Author(s):  
Qiang He ◽  
Hainan Ai ◽  
Hongxiang Chai ◽  
Xuebin Hu ◽  
Tengrui Long

Author(s):  
Yasmine Ben Osman ◽  
Jean-Marc Le Meins ◽  
Latifa Bousselmi ◽  
Hanene Akrout ◽  
Dominique Berling

2021 ◽  
pp. 100093
Author(s):  
Vishakha Gilhotra ◽  
Rekha Yadav ◽  
Aditi Sugha ◽  
Laxmi Das ◽  
Ashutosh Vashisht ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (12) ◽  
pp. 06019007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Schaefer ◽  
Christina Andaya ◽  
Andrew Maizel ◽  
Christopher P. Higgins

Catalysts ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 928
Author(s):  
Micah Flor V. Montefalcon ◽  
Meliton R. Chiong ◽  
Augustus C. Resurreccion ◽  
Sergi Garcia-Segura ◽  
Joey D. Ocon

Arsenic (As) is a naturally occurring element in the environment that poses significant risks to human health. Several treatment technologies have been successfully used in the treatment of As-contaminated waters. However, limited literature has explored advanced electrocoagulation (EC) processes for As removal. The present study evaluates the As removal performance of electrocoagulation, electrochemical peroxidation (ECP), and photo-assisted electrochemical peroxidation (PECP) technologies at circumneutral pH using electroactive iron electrodes. The influence of As speciation and the role of oxidants in As removal were investigated. We have identified the ECP process to be a promising alternative for the conventional EC with around 4-fold increase in arsenic removal capacity at a competitive cost of 0.0060 $/m3. Results also indicated that the rate of As(III) oxidation at the outset of electrochemical treatment dictates the extent of As removal. Both ECP and PECP processes reached greater than 96% As(III) conversion at 1 C/L and achieved 86% and 96% As removal at 5 C/L, respectively. Finally, the mechanism of As(III) oxidation was evaluated, and results showed that Fe(IV) is the intermediate oxidant generated in advanced EC processes, and the contribution of •OH brought by UV irradiation is insignificant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document