Strategies and Indications for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M)

Author(s):  
Anver Kuliev ◽  
Svetlana Rechitsky ◽  
Joe Leigh Simpson
Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine De Rycke ◽  
Veerle Berckmoes

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has evolved into a well-established alternative to invasive prenatal diagnosis, even though genetic testing of single or few cells is quite challenging. PGT-M is in theory available for any monogenic disorder for which the disease-causing locus has been unequivocally identified. In practice, the list of indications for which PGT is allowed may vary substantially from country to country, depending on PGT regulation. Technically, the switch from multiplex PCR to robust generic workflows with whole genome amplification followed by SNP array or NGS represents a major improvement of the last decade: the waiting time for the couples has been substantially reduced since the customized preclinical workup can be omitted and the workload for the laboratories has decreased. Another evolution is that the generic methods now allow for concurrent analysis of PGT-M and PGT-A. As innovative algorithms are being developed and the cost of sequencing continues to decline, the field of PGT moves forward to a sequencing-based, all-in-one solution for PGT-M, PGT-SR, and PGT-A. This will generate a vast amount of complex genetic data entailing new challenges for genetic counseling. In this review, we summarize the state-of-the-art for PGT-M and reflect on its future.


2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Svetlana Rechitsky ◽  
Tatiana Pakhalchuk ◽  
Maria Prokhorovich ◽  
Anver Kuliev

Inherited cancer predisposition is presently one of the major indications for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), providing an option for couplers at risk to avoid the birth of an offspring with predisposition to cancer. We present here our experience of 35 of 874 PGT cycles for cancer, in which in addition to BRCA1/2 the couples were at risk to another genetic conditions as well, for which PGT was performed together with PGT for breast cancer. This resulted in in birth of 20 mutation free children with not only unaffected for the tested genetic condition, but also without risk of developing cancer. This is a part of our overall PGT series of 6,204 PGT cases for monogenic disorders (PGT-M), with 2,517 resulting births, free of genetic disorder. The accumulated experience, demonstrates considerable progress in using PGT for avoiding the birth of affected children together with avoiding predisposition to cancer.


Author(s):  
Е.В. Соловьёва ◽  
О.Р. Канбекова ◽  
Д.И. Жигалина ◽  
Н.А. Скрябин ◽  
Л.И. Минайчева

В рамках подготовительных этапов преимплантационного тестирования 9 моногенных заболеваний (ПГT-М) методом гнездовой ПЦР проанализированы 144 локуса (STR и патогенные варианты)109 единичных клеток и 24 образцов продуктов полногеномной амплификации (ПГА) нескольких клеток. Pre-examination single cell validation was performed for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-M) for 9 monogenic disorders by nested PCR for STR and pathogenic variants. Totally 109 single cells and 24 WGA products (by MDA) were analyzed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 854-860
Author(s):  
Iris Lee ◽  
Snigdha Alur-Gupta ◽  
Robert Gallop ◽  
Anuja Dokras

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document