Evaluation of Current Crack Width Calculation Methods According to Eurocode 2 and fib Model Code 2010

2017 ◽  
pp. 1610-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reignard Tan ◽  
Max A. N. Hendriks ◽  
Terje Kanstad
Keyword(s):  
Crack Width ◽  
Calculation Methods ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Model Code 2010

scholarly journals Punching strength of reinforced concrete flat slabs without shear reinforcement

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 659-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. V. P. Sacramento ◽  
M. P. Ferreira ◽  
D. R. C. Oliveira ◽  
G. S. S. A. Melo
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Shear Crack ◽  
Theoretical Method ◽  
Shear Reinforcement ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Flat Slabs ◽  
Codes Of Practice ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Model Code 2010 ◽  
Theoretical Results

Punching strength is a critical point in the design of flat slabs and due to the lack of a theoretical method capable of explaining this phenomenon, empirical formulations presented by codes of practice are still the most used method to check the bearing capacity of slab-column connections. This paper discusses relevant aspects of the development of flat slabs, the factors that influence the punching resistance of slabs without shear reinforcement and makes comparisons between the experimental results organized in a database with 74 slabs carefully selected with theoretical results using the recommendations of ACI 318, EUROCODE 2 and NBR 6118 and also through the Critical Shear Crack Theory, presented by Muttoni (2008) and incorporated the new fib Model Code (2010).

scholarly journals Estudo comparativo entre valores teóricos e resultados experimentais de módulo de elasticidade de concretos produzidos com diferentes tipos de agregado graúdo

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Carlos dos Santos ◽  
Angela Maria de Arruda ◽  
Turibio José da Silva ◽  
Paula de Carvalho Palma Vitor
Keyword(s):  
Model Code ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Model Code 2010

Resumo O módulo de elasticidade do concreto é uma propriedade importante para os profissionais envolvidos na indústria da construção civil, uma vez que seu valor é determinante para o controle das deformações. Este trabalho avaliou o módulo de elasticidade de três classes distintas de concreto (C20, C30 e C40) produzidas com dois tipos litológicos de rochas, basalto e dolomito, de diferentes jazidas da região do Triângulo Mineiro. Como parte do estudo experimental, foram moldadas 324 amostras cilíndricas de 10 cm × 20 cm. Os valores de módulo de elasticidade obtidos foram comparados com seis formulações propostas em quatro normas, institutos e códigos do concreto: ABNT NBR 6118 versão 2007 e 2014, ACI 318, EUROCODE 2 and FIB Model Code, Ibracon 2003. Dentre as formulações propostas pelas normas, as indicadas pela FIB Model Code (2010) e ABNT NBR 6118 (2014) apresentaram valores mais próximos aos resultados experimentais deste estudo.

scholarly journals Behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete under combined compression and shear stresses

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (331) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
K. Liu ◽  
J. Yan ◽  
C. Zou
Keyword(s):  
Failure Criterion ◽  
Coarse Aggregate ◽  
Recycled Aggregate Concrete ◽  
Recycled Aggregate ◽  
Shear Stresses ◽  
Aggregate Concrete ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Model Code 2010 ◽  
Normal Strength

To investigate the behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) under combined compression and shear stresses, 75 hollow cylinder specimens prepared with various replacement ratios of recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) were tested with a self-designed loading device. The results showed that the failure pattern was similar for RAC with different replacement ratios of RCA. The ultimate shear stress improved with an increasing axial compression ratio of less than 0.6 and declined after exceeding 0.6. A modified failure criterion for RAC with normal strength under combined compression and shear stresses was proposed. A new procedure to predict the shear strength for RAC beams without stirrups was developed based on the proposed failure criterion, showing a better correlation with the experimental results than the predictions calculated by GB50010, Eurocode 2, fib Model Code 2010 and ACI 318-11.

Crack width calculation methods for large-scale concrete structures for the Ferry-Free E39

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reignard Tan ◽  
Terje Kanstad ◽  
Mette R. Geiker ◽  
Max A. N. Hendriks
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Calculation Method ◽  
Crack Width ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Concrete Structures ◽  
Calculation Methods ◽  
Empirical Formulas ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Semi Empirical

<p>Motivated by the establishment of a Ferry-Free E39 coastal highway route, crack width calculation methods for design of large-scale concrete structures are discussed. It is argued that the current semi-empirical formulas recommended by Eurocode 2 is inconsistent and overly conservative for cross sections with large bar diameters and covers. A suggestion to formulating a more consistent crack width calculation method is given.</p>

scholarly journals The influence of longitudinal reinforcement on shear capacity of reinforced concrete members without shear reinforcement

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
Marta Słowik
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Longitudinal Reinforcement ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Shear Reinforcement ◽  
Professional Literature ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Concrete Members ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Model Code 2010

In the paper, the influence of longitudinal reinforcement on shear capacity of reinforced concrete members without shear reinforcement is discussed. The problem is analyzed on the basis of the author’s own test results and tests results reported in the professional literature. It has been concluded that longitudinal reinforcement has an effect on shear capacity especially in members of shear span-to-depth ratio a/d < 2,5. The test results have also been used to verify standard methods of calculating the shear capacity in reinforced concrete members without shear reinforcement given in Eurocode 2, ACI Standard 318 and Model Code 2010.

scholarly journals Probabilistic Analysis of Crack Width

10.14311/26 ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Marková ◽  
M. Holický
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Probabilistic Analysis ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Crack Width ◽  
Concrete Slab ◽  
Concrete Element ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Slab ◽  
Model Code ◽  
European Model ◽  
Eurocode 2

Probabilistic analysis of crack width of a reinforced concrete element is based on the formulas accepted in Eurocode 2 and European Model Code 90. Obtained values of reliability index b seem to be satisfactory for the reinforced concrete slab that fulfils requirements for the crack width specified in Eurocode 2. However, the reliability of the slab seems to be insufficient when the European Model Code 90 is considered; reliability index is less than recommended value 1.5 for serviceability limit states indicated in Eurocode 1. Analysis of sensitivity factors of basic variables enables to find out variables significantly affecting the total crack width.

scholarly journals Theoretical prediction of punching shear capacity of flat slabs without shear reinforcement strengthened by concrete topping

2021 ◽  
Vol 1203 (2) ◽  
pp. 022108
Author(s):  
Daniel Čereš ◽  
Katarína Gajdošová
Keyword(s):  
Shear Resistance ◽  
Design Guidelines ◽  
Shear Capacity ◽  
Reinforcement Ratio ◽  
Punching Shear ◽  
Shear Reinforcement ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Flat Slabs ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Model Code 2010

Abstract The main reasons for strengthening flat slabs are the change of the use of a building, increase in the value of loads, degradation of the concrete cover layer, or insufficient reinforcement. This paper is focused on the assessment of punching shear capacity of the strengthened flat slabs without shear reinforcement. One of the possibilities how to enhance punching shear capacity is the addition of reinforced concrete topping. The main goal of this paper is to compare the possibilities for calculation of the increase in the punching shear capacity by investigation of the influence of different thicknesses of concrete toppings and different reinforcement ratio. A reference specimen is represented by a fragment of a flat slab with the thickness of h = 200 mm supported by circular column with the diameter of 250 mm. Three different thicknesses (50 mm, 100 mm, 150 mm) of concrete toppings were considered together with three different reinforcement ratios for each thickness of concrete overlay. Theoretical predictions of the punching shear resistance of flat slabs were evaluated by design guidelines according to the relevant standards: Eurocode 2 (EN 1992-1-1), Model Code 2010 and draft of the second generation of Eurocode 2 (prEN 1992-1-1). The differences in the influence of reinforcement ratio are significant. In Model Code 2010 the reinforcement ratio in concrete topping was considered in equation of moment of resistance. This is unlike in both of the mentioned Eurocodes, where the reinforcement ratio was assumed as a geometric average value of the original reinforcement ratio in the slab before strengthening and of the reinforcement ratio of concrete topping. All the predicted theoretical calculations are based on the perfect connection and bond between the original and new layer of concrete. These predictions should be verified by experimental investigation, which is going to be prepared shortly. By the additional increase in the thickness of concrete topping or in the amount of added reinforcement the attention should be payed to the limitation of the punching shear resistance by the value of the maximum punching shear resistance in the compression concrete strut.

scholarly journals Creep of Concrete According to Creep Prediction Models and Own Research

2018 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 02024
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Wypych ◽  
Krzysztof Klempka ◽  
Marek Jędrzejczak
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Stress ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Laboratory Research ◽  
Concrete Creep ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Eurocode 2 ◽  
Linear Creep ◽  
Model Code 2010

The paper presents the currently used procedures for calculating the deformation of concrete and creep coefficients. Laboratory research was conducted on the creep of concrete. Creep coefficients were calculated on the basis of experimentally obtained data and later compared to the ones acquired by using previously demonstrated procedures. In the case of the sample subjected to the influence of compressive stress and not exceeding the limit of linear creep, the models in Eurocode 2 and fib Model Code 2010 did not correspond to the experimentally obtained data.

scholarly journals Applicability of Existing Crack Controlling Criteria for Structures with Large Concrete Cover Thickness

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-91
Author(s):  
Chavin Nilanga Naotunna ◽  
S.M Samindi M.K Samarakoon ◽  
Kjell Tore Fosså
Keyword(s):  
Crack Width ◽  
Concrete Cover ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Long Term Study ◽  
Model Code 2010 ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Cover Thickness ◽  
Crack Widths ◽  
Calculation Models

Abstract Widely used crack width calculation models and allowable crack width limits have changed from time to time and differ from region to region. It can be identified that some crack width calculation models consist with limitations for parameters like cover thickness. The current Norwegian requirement for cover thickness is larger than these limitations. The applicability of existing crack width calculation models and the allowable crack width limits must be verified for structures with large cover thickness. The background of crack width calculation models in Eurocode, Model Code 2010, Japanese code, American code and British code have been examined. By comparing the experimental crack widths with the predictions of the aforementioned models, the existing codes can be identified as requiring modification. Considering the durability aspect, it can be identified a long-term study proving that the allowable crack width can be increased with the increase in cover thickness. When considering the aesthetic aspect, the authors suggest categorizing the structures based on their prestige level and deciding the allowable crack widths accordingly. The paper proposes potential solutions for future research on how to improve both crack width calculation methods and allowable crack width limits to be used effectively in structures with large cover thickness.

scholarly journals Applicability of existing crack controlling criteria for structures with large concrete cover thickness: Review.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chavin Naotunna ◽  
S.M Samindi M.K Samarakoon ◽  
Kjell Fosså
Keyword(s):  
Crack Width ◽  
Concrete Cover ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Rc Structures ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Design Life ◽  
Service Load ◽  
Model Code 2010 ◽  
Cover Thickness ◽  
Calculation Models

Adverse effects from the cracks in Reinforced Concrete (RC) structures are controlled at the structural design stage. Cracks due to service load are controlled by limiting the ‘calculated crack width’ to a ‘maximum allowable crack width’. With the understanding of social and economic advantages of long design life structures, there is a trend of constructing structures up to 300 years of design life. To enhance durability, such structures require relatively large concrete cover thickness. The existing ‘crack width calculation models’, have to be validated before using on such large cover structures. The predictions of crack width calculation models in Eurocode 2, Model Code 2010, Japanese Code, American Code and British code were compared with the results of recent experiments with large cover specimens. It could identify that the aforementioned models have to be improved to predict the crack widths of large cover structures. The necessary improvements of each model have been identified. Next, a literature survey was conducted to check the applicability of the existing ‘allowable crack width limits’, for the structures with large concrete covers. To effectively use the existing allowable limits on such structures, the necessary improvements and future works have been identified considering the durability, aesthetic and tightness criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document