Classification of Endometrial Cancer

Author(s):  
Elisabeth Åvall Lundqvist
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v899-v900 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.L. Creutzberg ◽  
A. Leon-Castillo ◽  
S.M. de Boer ◽  
M.E. Powell ◽  
L.R. Mileshkin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1086-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Li ◽  
Ashwin Shinde ◽  
Ernest Han ◽  
Stephen Lee ◽  
Sushil Beriwal ◽  
...  

BackgroundRandomized trials describe differing sets of high–intermediate risk criteria.ObjectiveTo use the National Cancer Database to compare the impact of radiation therapy in patients with stage I endometrial cancer meeting different criteria, and define a classification of “unfavorable risk.”MethodsPatients with stage I endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database and stratified into two cohorts: (1) patients meeting Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-99 criteria only for high–intermediate risk, but not Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC)-1 criteria and (2) those meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. High-risk stage I patients with both FIGO stage IB (under FIGO 2009 staging) and grade 3 disease were excluded. In each cohort, propensity score-matched survival analyses were performed. Based on these analyses, we propose a new classification of unfavorable risk. We then analyzed the association of adjuvant radiation with survival, stratified by this classification.ResultsWe identified 117,272 patients with stage I endometrial cancer. Of these, 11,207 patients met GOG-99 criteria only and 5,920 patients met PORTEC-1 criteria only. After propensity score matching, adjuvant radiation therapy improved survival (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; p=0.002) in the GOG-99 only cohort. However, there was no benefit of adjuvant radiation (HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; p=0.355) in the PORTEC-1 only cohort. We, therefore, defined unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer as two or more of the following risk factors: lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2–3 disease, and FIGO stage IB. Adjuvant radiation improved survival in stage I patients with adverse risk factors (HR=0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.80; p<0.001), but not in other stage I patients (HR=1.02; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; p=0.710; p interaction <0.001).ConclusionOur study showed that adjuvant radiation was associated with an overall survival benefit in patients meeting GOG-99 criteria only; however, no survival benefit was seen in patients meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. We propose a definition of unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer: ≥2 risk factors from among lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2–3 disease, and FIGO stage IB disease.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
F. K. L. Tournois ◽  
H. J. M. M. Mertens

Nowadays, the incidence of endometrial cancer is rising, especially of high-grade endometrial tumours. Recently, the FIGO classification of endometrial cancer has changed worldwide. Besides that, treatment strategies are changing. The purpose of this study was to analyse the adherence to the national guidelines of cancer treatment and to analyse patterns of disease relapse and survival. We focused on a group of patients () with endometrial cancer, in a time period in which new treatment strategies are not yet completely implemented. Because of multiple upcoming changes in patient characteristics, tumour classification, as well as treatment regimens, a more heterogeneous cohort of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer will appear. From now on, all those changes will have their effects on the followup of conventional endometrial cancer treatment. In our opinion, it is, therefore, valuable to have the current, more homogenous, cohort clearly described.


2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
J. Kuroki ◽  
K. Hasegawa ◽  
R. Kato ◽  
J. Mizukawa ◽  
E. Nishio ◽  
...  

The objective of this research is whether the classification of vascular invasion severity can be used as a prognostic factor in cases of uterine endometrial cancer. Sixty-five patients with stage I to III uterine endometrial cancer were included in the study. All patients were seen between 1987 and 1997, and the types of their cancers were histologically confirmed. The degree of vascular invasion was classified according to three different systems: (1) positive or negative; (2) negative, mild, or severe; and (3) negative, mild, moderate, or severe. For each classification, the disease-free survival rate was calculated according to various pathologic factors using the Wilcoxon test; multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model.Patients with severe vascular invasion showed a significantly lower disease-free survival rate than did patients with moderate or less severe invasion. In the multivariate analysis, severe vascular invasion was shown to be an independent prognostic factor indicating a high relative risk. We conclude that the severity of vascular invasion is an important histopathologic factor in determining the prognosis of uterine endometrial cancer. Vascular invasion classification systems employing three subjective or four objective categories may be more appropriate than a positive/negative classification system for judging the prognosis in cases of uterine endometrial cancer.


2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 387-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lavaud ◽  
B. Fedida ◽  
G. Canlorbe ◽  
S. Bendifallah ◽  
E. Darai ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Ballester ◽  
Martin Koskas ◽  
Charles Coutant ◽  
Elisabeth Chéreau ◽  
Jeremy Seror ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document