Decision Making in Social Actions

Author(s):  
Gabriella Marcarelli ◽  
Viviana Ventre
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Tommy Wijaya

This study aims to analyze the impact of Cognitive Moral Development in honesty budget reporting because honesty in employees is important in the success of a company so it needs to be formed early. The development of Cognitive Morals is justification in making decisions relating to social actions to act ethically. Honesty of budget reporting in this study has a treatment in order to give an ethical dilemma effect on participants in decision making. The sample of this study was 48 active students of Soegijapranata Catholic University Semarang who have taken Cost Accounting courses. This study uses DIT (Define issue test) on cognitive moral development and SPSS programs. The results showed that individuals with high levels of cognitive moral development tend to be more honest in reporting budgets so that it can be said that cognitive moral development affects the honesty of budget reporting. Under optimal hurdle contract, individuals tend to be more honest in reporting budgets than in contract trust conditions so it can be said that there are differences in cognitive moral development in honesty of budget reporting. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak Cognitive Moral Development dalam kejujuran pelaporan anggaran karena kejujuran pada karyawan merupakan hal yang penting dalam keberhasilan suatu perusahaan sehingga perlu dibentuk sejak dini. Cognitive Moral Development merupakan dasar pembenaran dalam pengambilan keputusan yang berkaitan dengan tindakan sosial untuk bertindak etis. Kejujuran pelaporan anggaran dalam penelitian ini memiliki treatment untuk memberikan efek dilema etis pada partisipan dalam pengambilan keputusan. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 48 mahasiswa aktif Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang yang telah mengambil mata kuliah Akuntansi Biaya. Penelitian ini menggunakan DIT (Define issue test) untuk cognitive moral development dan program SPSS. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa individu dengan tingkat cognitive moral development yang tinggi cenderung lebih jujur dalam melaporakan anggaran sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa cognitive moral development berpengaruh terhdap kejujuran pelaporan anggaran. Pada kondisi optimal hurdle contract individu cenderung lebih jujur melaporkan anggaran dibandingkan pada kondisi trust contract sehingga dapat dikatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan dalam cognitive moral development terhadap kejujuran pelaporan anggaran.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Simen ◽  
Fuat Balcı

AbstractRahnev & Denison (R&D) argue against normative theories and in favor of a more descriptive “standard observer model” of perceptual decision making. We agree with the authors in many respects, but we argue that optimality (specifically, reward-rate maximization) has proved demonstrably useful as a hypothesis, contrary to the authors’ claims.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Danks

AbstractThe target article uses a mathematical framework derived from Bayesian decision making to demonstrate suboptimal decision making but then attributes psychological reality to the framework components. Rahnev & Denison's (R&D) positive proposal thus risks ignoring plausible psychological theories that could implement complex perceptual decision making. We must be careful not to slide from success with an analytical tool to the reality of the tool components.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
David R. Shanks ◽  
Ben R. Newell

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 274-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Convery ◽  
Gitte Keidser ◽  
Louise Hickson ◽  
Carly Meyer

Purpose Hearing loss self-management refers to the knowledge and skills people use to manage the effects of hearing loss on all aspects of their daily lives. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-reported hearing loss self-management and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. Method Thirty-seven adults with hearing loss, all of whom were current users of bilateral hearing aids, participated in this observational study. The participants completed self-report inventories probing their hearing loss self-management and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. Correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between individual domains of hearing loss self-management and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. Results Participants who reported better self-management of the effects of their hearing loss on their emotional well-being and social participation were more likely to report less aided listening difficulty in noisy and reverberant environments and greater satisfaction with the effect of their hearing aids on their self-image. Participants who reported better self-management in the areas of adhering to treatment, participating in shared decision making, accessing services and resources, attending appointments, and monitoring for changes in their hearing and functional status were more likely to report greater satisfaction with the sound quality and performance of their hearing aids. Conclusion Study findings highlight the potential for using information about a patient's hearing loss self-management in different domains as part of clinical decision making and management planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document