Liver Metastases of Neuroendocrine Tumors and CCC

2014 ◽  
pp. 73-88
Author(s):  
Thomas Ettrich ◽  
Thomas Seufferlein
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. E2-E89
Author(s):  
G Atanasov ◽  
I Tsvetkova ◽  
S Benjamin ◽  
A Andreou ◽  
F Klein ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-322
Author(s):  
V. V. Delektorskaya ◽  
O. N. Solov'eva ◽  
G. Yu. Chemeris ◽  
Yu. I. Patyutko

Background:Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) represent a group of rare epithelial neoplasms with a highly variable clinical course. AKT1 is one of the most frequently activated protein kinases in pNETs, which promotes the tumor growth and is of interest as a prognostic factor and a target for new treatment approaches.Aim:To study the expression of the phosphorylated variant of AKT1-kinase (p-AKT1) in primary pNETs and their liver metastases and to correlate the results with various clinical and pathological parameters and the disease prognosis.Materials and methods:P-AKT1 expression was studied by the immunohistochemical analysis of the primary lesions and liver metastases in 52 pNETs patients.Results:A high level of cytoplasmic and/or nuclear immunoreactivity was detected in 24/52 of the primary pNETs (46.2%) and in 16/27 of their liver metastases (59.3%). p-AKT1 expression was observed in 3 (21.4%) of NET grade (G) 1, in 14 (46.7%) of NET G2, and in 7 (87.5%) of NET G3. p-AKT1 expression was more frequently identified in pNET G3 category and increased during the tumor progression in metachronous liver metastases, as compared to the corresponding primary tumor. In addition, p-AKT1 positivity was significantly associated with an increase of grade from G1 to G3 (p = 0.004), the Ki-67 index (p = 0.029), the pTNM stage (p = 0.0008), perineural invasion (p = 0.031) and a decrease in disease-free survival (p = 0.05).Conclusion:The results suggest that p-АКТ1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of pNETs and may be an additional criterion for assessment of the prognosis and treatment effectiveness in this type of tumors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 038-045
Author(s):  
J. Hinshaw ◽  
Kelli Moore ◽  
Monika Rastogi

AbstractNeuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that require a multidisciplinary process to determine the most appropriate approach for patient management and therapy. Over time, the treatment algorithms have continuously evolved as the options have improved and changed. This manuscript reviews the current and potential role of image-guided ablation in the treatment of patients with metastatic NET to the liver. While some attention will be devoted to the basics of ablation, the focus will be on the role of image-guided ablation in these patients and issues specific to the treatment of NET's liver metastases with ablation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-hui Yuan ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Dian-rong Xiu ◽  
Ming Tao ◽  
Zhao-lai Ma ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1981-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Elisa Rossi ◽  
Sara Massironi ◽  
Matilde Pia Spampatti ◽  
Dario Conte ◽  
Clorinda Ciafardini ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4143-4143
Author(s):  
Michael A. Choti ◽  
Sarah Bobiak ◽  
Mark Bloomston ◽  
Carrie C. Zornosa ◽  
Emily K. Bergsland ◽  
...  

4143 Background: The choice of therapy in patients with hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors is controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the utilization of liver resection and other locoregional therapies in the management of NET hepatic metastases in NCCN centers. Methods: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Neuroendocrine Tumor Database tracks longitudinal care for patients treated at seven specialty cancer centers in the U.S. from 2004 to 2010. Patient and tumor characteristics, as well as the use of liver-directed therapy (LDT) in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) were evaluated. Results: Among 907 patients presenting with metastatic disease, 606 patients presenting with newly diagnosed disease or previously diagnosed disease with first distant recurrence of NELM were evaluated. LDT was used during some component of the patient care in only 43% of patients with NELM, the remainder received only systemic or no therapy. LDT varied by extent of disease (p=0.002) with a higher proportion of patients with liver-only disease receiving LDT (45%) compared to those with liver and extrahepatic disease (26%). There was a significant difference in LDT by functional tumor status (Χ2=6.84, p=0.03) and primary site of disease (Χ2=14.95, p=0.001) where a higher proportion of patients with hormonally functional tumors received LDT when compared to non-functional tumors (48% vs 42%) as well as those with primary small bowel carcinoid vs pancreatic NET (56% vs 39%). Among those treated with LDT, 39% underwent surgical resection, 57% intra-arterial therapy (IAT), and 4% ablation alone. Major hepatectomy was performed in 21%, multiple resections in 13%, and resection combined with ablation in 24% of patients receiving surgical therapy. Among the 147 patients treated with IAT, 52% received standard chemoembolization, 23% bland embolization, and 18% yttrium-90 therapy. Conclusions: Even at specialty centers less than half of patients received LDT, among which one-fifth had a hepatic resection. Future studies on this cohort will measure outcomes based on type of LDT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document