A Blackboard Control Architecture for Therapy Planning

Author(s):  
S. Quaglini ◽  
R. Bellazzi ◽  
C. Berzuini ◽  
M. Stefanelli ◽  
G. Barosi
1995 ◽  
Vol 34 (05) ◽  
pp. 475-488
Author(s):  
B. Seroussi ◽  
J. F. Boisvieux ◽  
V. Morice

Abstract:The monitoring and treatment of patients in a care unit is a complex task in which even the most experienced clinicians can make errors. A hemato-oncology department in which patients undergo chemotherapy asked for a computerized system able to provide intelligent and continuous support in this task. One issue in building such a system is the definition of a control architecture able to manage, in real time, a treatment plan containing prescriptions and protocols in which temporal constraints are expressed in various ways, that is, which supervises the treatment, including controlling the timely execution of prescriptions and suggesting modifications to the plan according to the patient’s evolving condition. The system to solve these issues, called SEPIA, has to manage the dynamic, processes involved in patient care. Its role is to generate, in real time, commands for the patient’s care (execution of tests, administration of drugs) from a plan, and to monitor the patient’s state so that it may propose actions updating the plan. The necessity of an explicit time representation is shown. We propose using a linear time structure towards the past, with precise and absolute dates, open towards the future, and with imprecise and relative dates. Temporal relative scales are introduced to facilitate knowledge representation and access.


1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Murphy ◽  
Robert L. Williams ◽  
III

1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
TONG FANG ◽  
MOHSEN A. JAFARI ◽  
AHMAD SAFARI ◽  
STEPHEN C. DANFORTH

2019 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. E34-E51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Nuernberg ◽  
Adrian Saftoiu ◽  
Ana Barreiros ◽  
Eike Burmester ◽  
Elena Ivan ◽  
...  

AbstractThis article represents part 3 of the EFSUMB Recommendations and Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Ultrasound (GIUS). It provides an overview of the examination techniques recommended by experts in the field of endorectal/endoanal ultrasound (ERUS/EAUS), as well as perineal ultrasound (PNUS). The most important indications are rectal tumors and inflammatory diseases like fistula and abscesses in patients with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PNUS sometimes is more flexible and convenient compared to ERUS. However, the technique of ERUS is quite well established, especially for the staging of rectal cancer. EAUS also gained ground in the evaluation of perianal diseases like fistulas, abscesses and incontinence. For the staging of perirectal tumors, the use of PNUS in addition to conventional ERUS could be recommended. For the staging of anal carcinomas, PNUS can be a good option because of the higher resolution. Both ERUS and PNUS are considered excellent guidance methods for invasive interventions, such as the drainage of fluids or targeted biopsy of tissue lesions. For abscess detection and evaluation, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) also helps in therapy planning.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Bär ◽  
Charles‐Antoine Collins‐Fekete ◽  
Vasilis Rompokos ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Mark N. Gaze ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document