scholarly journals Evolving Robots Able to Integrate Sensory-Motor Information over Time

Author(s):  
Stefano Nolfi ◽  
Davide Marocco
2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 287-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Nolfi ◽  
Davide Marocco

Author(s):  
Raquel Lahoz Alonso ◽  
Paula Sienes Bailo ◽  
Jose Luis Capablo Liesa ◽  
Sara Álvarez de Andrés ◽  
Jose Luis Bancalero Flores ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesDescribe a case with axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) type 2W, a neurological disease characterized by peripheral neuropathy typically involving the lower limbs and causing gait alterations and distal sensory-motor impairment.Case presentationWe report this case, where the application of massive genetic sequencing (NGS) with clinical exome in a molecular genetics laboratory enabled to detect the presence of candidate variants of the clinic of the patient.ConclusionsThe variant detected in HARS gene suggests that this variant could be causative of the symptoms of the patient, who went undiagnosed for 20 years and experienced an exacerbation of symptoms over time.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelly Levy-Tzedek ◽  
Itai Novick ◽  
Roni Arbel ◽  
Sami Abboud ◽  
Shachar Maidenbaum ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjan Chatterjee

AbstractThe idea that concepts are embodied by our motor and sensory systems is popular in current theorizing about cognition. Embodied cognition accounts come in different versions and are often contrasted with a purely symbolic amodal view of cognition. Simulation, or the hypothesis that concepts simulate the sensory and motor experience of real world encounters with instances of those concepts, has been prominent in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Here, with a focus on spatial thought and language, I review some of the evidence cited in support of simulation versions of embodied cognition accounts. While these data are extremely interesting and many of the experiments are elegant, knowing how to best interpret the results is often far from clear. I point out that a quick acceptance of embodied accounts runs the danger of ignoring alternate hypotheses and not scrutinizing neuroscience data critically. I also review recent work from my lab that raises questions about the nature of sensory motor grounding in spatial thought and language. In my view, the question of whether or not cognition is grounded is more fruitfully replaced by questions about gradations in this grounding. A focus on disembodying cognition, or on graded grounding, opens the way to think about how humans abstract. Within neuroscience, I propose that three functional anatomic axes help frame questions about the graded nature of grounded cognition. First, are questions of laterality differences. Do association cortices in both hemispheres instantiate the same kind of sensory or motor information? Second, are questions about ventral dorsal axes. Do neuronal ensembles along this axis shift from conceptual representations of objects to the relationships between objects? Third, are questions about gradients centripetally from sensory and motor cortices towards and within perisylvian cortices. How does sensory and perceptual information become more language-like and then get transformed into language proper?


1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-322
Author(s):  
James R. Lackner

Human sensory-motor control and orientation involve the correlation of sensory information from many modalities with motor information about ongoing patterns of voluntary and reflexive activation of the body musculature. The vestibular system represents only one of the acceleration-sensitive receptor systems of the body conveying spatial information. Touch- and pressure-dependent receptors, somatosensory and interoceptive, as well as proprioceptive receptors contribute, along with visual and auditory signals specifying relative motion between self and surround. Control of body movement and orientation is dynamically adapted to the 1G force background of Earth. Exposure to non-1G environments such as in space travel produces a variety of sensory-motor disturbances, and often motion sickness, until adaptation is achieved. Exposure to virtual environments in which body movements are not accompanied by normal patterns of inertial and sensory feedback can also lead to control errors and elicit motion sickness.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Colnaghi ◽  
Stefano Ramat ◽  
Egidio D’Angelo ◽  
Andrea Cortese ◽  
Giorgio Beltrami ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document