Plant root water extraction studies using stable isotopes

Author(s):  
F. N. Dalton
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youri Rothfuss ◽  
Valentin Couvreur ◽  
Félicien Meunier ◽  
Hannes De Deurwaerder ◽  
Marco D. Visser ◽  
...  

<p>In the past decade, plant root water uptake (RWU) has been a major focus of ecohydrological studies employing water stable isotopes. The interest of the isotopic community for RWU rose concomitantly to the development of open-access multi-source mixing models based on Bayesian inference. Another more general reason was certainly the decrease in analytical cost with the advent of isotope-specific laser absorption spectrometry. The isotopic methodology used to determine relative profiles of RWU works on the premises that (i) RWU does not fractionate stable isotopes in water and (ii) the isotopic composition of water inside the xylem vessel of the last non-evaporating part of the plant (typically the stem) is that of RWU. Following a simple mass balance approach, the isotopic composition of RWU can be linked back by inversion to contributions to RWU (i.e., relative RWU) of a set of potential water sources (of known isotopic compositions) originating from the soil profile.</p><p>In recent research, the preferred tool for inverting water isotope data was Bayesian models and the literature shows that only a handful of studies complemented isotope analysis with observation of plant water status and flow. Consequently, most of the gathered information on RWU cannot be used to test hypotheses on which are built physically-based soil-root water flow models. The authors have on the other hand initiated an effort within the framework of dual experimental-modeling approaches, where tightly-controlled experiments are thought and prepared in order to validate, parameterize models, or test hypotheses. The present contribution gives an overview of the different attempts at integrating both water and isotope observations types and confronting them to model simulations explicitly accounting for root system architecture and hydraulic properties. It addresses the meaningfulness and limitations of isotope data, especially in the context of labeling experiments when treated with statistical (e.g. Bayesian) models. We finally propose a way forward and present improvements to be achieved on both experimental and modeling sides to increase the reliability and precision of isotope-derived estimates of RWU.</p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 335 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 181-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuejun Dong ◽  
Bob D. Patton ◽  
Anne C. Nyren ◽  
Paul E. Nyren ◽  
Lyle D. Prunty

2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugênio F. Coelho ◽  
Delfran B. dos Santos ◽  
Carlos A. V. de Azevedo

This research had as its objective the investigation of an alternative strategy for soil sensor placement to be used in citrus orchards irrigated by micro sprinkler. An experiment was carried out in a Tahiti lemon orchard under three irrigation intervals of 1, 2 and 3 days. Soil water potential, soil water content distribution and root water extraction were monitored by a time-domain-reflectometry (TDR) in several positions in soil profiles radial to the trees. Root length and root length density were determined from digital root images at the same positions in the soil profiles where water content was monitored. Results showed the importance of considering root water extraction in the definition of soil water sensor placement. The profile regions for soil water sensor placement should correspond to the intersection of the region containing at least 80% of total root length and the region of at least 80% of total water extraction. In case of tensiometers, the region of soil water potential above -80 kPa should be included in the intersection.


Soil Science ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. K. Adiku ◽  
C. W. Rose ◽  
R. D. Braddock ◽  
H. Ozier-Lafontaine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud Tissink ◽  
Jesse Radolinski ◽  
David Reinthaler ◽  
Erich Pötsch ◽  
Michael Bahn

<p>Plants can modulate the source and magnitude of water uptake under environmental stresses, ultimately constraining water and energy fluxes across Earth’s surface. These alterations are scarcely quantified for future climatic scenarios such as warming, elevated atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> (eCO<sub>2</sub>), and droughts—all projected by the end of this century. Here we use diurnal soil moisture dynamics throughout the 2019 growing season to quantify the impacts of these three global change factors on root water uptake in a managed C<sub>3</sub> mountain grassland in Austria; a key agricultural landscape within central Europe. To determine whether plants alter water uptake via root trait adjustments, we then compared water uptake to root morphological traits. We expected that 1) drought and eCO<sub>2</sub> (+300 ppm) would reduce root water uptake relative to ambient conditions due to supply limitation and a lower stomatal conductance, whereas 2) greater vapor pressure gradients in warmed systems would elevate transpiration rates, increasing root water uptake. Plants reduced water uptake in droughted plots by ~35% regardless of other factors applied, due to decreased water extraction from the soil surface during the peak drought. Warmed plots had unexpectedly lower water uptake by 17-25% relative to control plots. Finally, vegetation in eCO<sub>2</sub> plots displayed similar water uptake to plots under ambient conditions; however, eCO<sub>2</sub> effects did buffer warming effects, such that plots with eCO<sub>2 </sub>and warming extracted less water than those subjected to warming alone. Root morphological traits showed strong linear correlations (R > 0.7, or R < -0.7) to root water uptake in ambient, drought, and eCO<sub>2</sub> plots, yet no significant relationship was found for plots under warming or multifactor treatments. Relationships were strongest and most abundant following a drought. This suggests that—though plants may optimize root structure for drought recovery—plants may alter their root systems to account for resource limitations other than water in a warming climate. Altogether, we show that warming, eCO<sub>2</sub>, and droughts may significantly alter the root water extraction in managed C<sub>3</sub> mountain grasslands, but changes in water availability alone may not fully explain plant water uptake responses.</p>


1986 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 583 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Gimenez ◽  
E Fereres

Experiments were conducted between 1981 and 1983 at Cordoba, Spain, to determine the morphophysiological basis for the differences in yield responses to drought of eight sunflower genotypes. There was genotypic variation in most characters examined, particularly in maximum leaf area and in leaf area duration, biomass accumulation and distribution, and in root water extraction. Long-season genotypes had greater leaf area and produced more biomass under drought conditions, exploring the subsoil down to 270 cm. Short-season genotypes restricted water extraction to the top 180 cm of the soil profile and had about half of the leaf area duration of a long-season cultivar. Evidence is presented of small differences in osmotic adjustment among genotypes. The relations between leaf area and grain yield as well as calculations of a carbon balance for the reproductive period suggest genotypic differences in photosynthetic efficiency under drought.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document