Participation of Natural Resources in Income Distribution – A Distribution System Balancing Intergenerational Equity and Ecological Efficiency

Author(s):  
Luo Liyan
Author(s):  
Jānis Zvirgzdiņš ◽  
Kaspars Plotka ◽  
Sanda Geipele

Abstract Economic models are built primarily following the classical economic theories, but a challenge to build good models with classical theories is needed to define the exact value of the Earth, which is hardly definable. Quite often national gross product indicator calculation reuses the same performance indicators, where the resource and income distribution system is not linked to production factors. The resource and income distribution system is primarily associated with low productivity (execution of a sales plan, execution of a profit plan, profitability level, increase in market share, personnel turnover rate, hours worked per employee). Changes in the productive and economic structures of the markets result in new innovative growth patterns which, based on customer motivation, are linked to the concentration of capital in regional and national markets, the growth of transnational markets and the development of technology. At the same time, extensive economic development through natural resources leads to deforestation, landscape changes, desertification, swamping and soil fertility renewal. So far, it often has been assumed that economic growth depends on the use of natural resources, and natural resources are unlimited. The results are “resource crisis”: resources are running out and resource prices are rising, thus invalidating a particular model. On the other hand, the eco-economy approach is a sustainable future for the economic modelling. The principle of eco-economy is based on a production system, which relies on re-cyclicality (the basis is the production of zero waste production). For this to happen, a transition to a completely new mind-set is needed. The research results were previously approbated during the graduate meeting of the Baltic DBU scholarship holders from 4 to 6 May 2018 in Latvia.


1980 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-117
Author(s):  
Amit Bhaduri

In the usual format of Keynesian growth models investment governs saving: higher investment causes more profits either through greater capacity utilization (normal 'multiplier') or through rising price. (‘Profit inflation,) which, in turn, generates the matching level of savings. The present paper argues that such methods of financial higher investment plans are neither socially desirable nor even sustainable over time In an underdeveloped mixed economy. Consequently, alternative institutional and financial arrangements, where. crucial role Is assigned to a public distribution system of essential goods and profits of public enterprises, becomes imperative.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore Lianos

Environmental degradation and inequality of income and wealth are two major global problems at the present time. This paper suggests that a steady state economy offers solutions for both problems. It argues that if the world population is drastically reduced and remains constant at a low level ecological balance can be achieved and, at the same time, income distribution will be greatly improved. The basis of this argument is that a smaller population will reduce the use of natural resources for production and consumption and at the same time reduce the supply of labor and thus increase wages. Also, a brief review of the idea of the steady state economy from the ancient philosophers to modern writers is provided.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semiletov O.

The article considers public management approaches to ensuring the rational use of natural resources from the standpoint of analysis of foreign management practices in this area. The Index of ecological efficiency in our state is investigated. The ways to improve and influence the domestic policy and the characteristic features of the current legislation in the field of environmental protection, as well as the directions of its consideration in Ukraine are identified.


Author(s):  
Yohanes Maria Vianey Mudayen ◽  
Herry Maridjo

This study aims to determine the impacts of fiscal decentralization, institutional transformation, and regional revenue to the income disparity among the provinces in Indonesia. This study uses panel data with the number of runs 528 pieces of data that includes 33 provinces in Indonesia period 2000-2015. The data were taken from the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) and Bank Indonesia. They were analyzed using a multiple linear regression analysis. The results show that tax revenue sharing fund and natural resources revenue sharing fund impact positive and significant on the income disparity among the provinces in Indonesia, while the general allocation fund, special allocation fund, institutional transformation, and the local revenue do not significantly affect the income disparity among the provinces in Indonesia. Tax and natural resources revenue sharing fund are actually exacerbating the gap of income distribution among regions in Indonesia. The implication of this study is that the government needs to review the allocation mechanism of General Allocation Fund, Special Allocation Fund, Tax Revenue Sharing Fund and Natural Resources Revenue Sharing Fund in order to serve as an instrument of fiscal capacity equalization of each region as well income distribution equalization among regions in Indonesia. The local government needs to continue improving the local revenue through the optimization of local tax revenue, regional retribution, profits of Regional Owned Enterprises, and other legitimate acceptances.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document