Effect of Cold Drawing on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of 410 Martensite Stainless Steel Wire

2018 ◽  
pp. 477-485
Author(s):  
Haonan Yu ◽  
Renbo Song ◽  
Yao Tan ◽  
Tianyi Wang ◽  
Lun Li
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Steel Wire ◽  
Cold Drawing ◽  
Stainless Steel Wire ◽  
Microstructure And Mechanical Properties

scholarly journals Effect of drawing and annealing on the microstructure and mechanical properties of 304 austenitic stainless steel wire

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinhua Xu ◽  
Jianxin Zhu ◽  
Yong Zong ◽  
Lihua Liu ◽  
Xiaoyong Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Steel Wire ◽  
Stacking Fault ◽  
Stainless Steel Wire ◽  
Electron Backscattered Diffraction ◽  
Microstructure And Mechanical Properties ◽  
304 Austenitic Stainless Steel

Abstract Plastic deformation at room temperature, and the proceeding heat treatments, are important processes for optimizing the microstructure and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel. The microstructure and mechanical properties of cold-drawn 304 austenitic stainless steel wire were investigated after annealing at 700 and 800 °C, with different times (20, 40 and 60 min) and drawing strain (0.4, 1.0 and 1.5). Electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) techniques, trans-mission electron microscope (TEM) analysis, differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and tensile tests were performed in order to study the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties during different annealing processes for the 304 austenitic stainless steel wire. The results showed that the quantity of α’ martensite and dislocations increased with an increase in the strain, which means that, while the ultimate tensile strength of the cold-drawn wires elevated, the elongation reduced. The mechanical properties of stainless steel wires also varied with the evolution of martensite transformation characteristics, density of stacking fault, dislocation and twin, as well as the recrystallization degree under various annealing conditions. The recrystalli-zation temperature of steel wire was mainly determined by the magnitude of the strain, while the martensite reversal temperature was determined by the stacking fault energy and the de-formation value. The temperature of recrystallization and martensite reverse in steel wire de-creased with the increment of the strain. The balance of tensile strength and elongation of steel wire can be obtained by adopting the proper annealing process combined with cold-drawing deformation. In this paper, we showed that a good combination of strength and elongation in 304 austenitic stainless steel can be obtained with a strain of 1.5 annealed at 800 °C for 20 min.

Bending Properties of General Purpose Stainless Steel Wire Formed for Orthodontic Use

2013 ◽  
Vol 746 ◽  
pp. 394-399
Author(s):  
Niwat Anuwongnukroh ◽  
Yosdhorn Chuankrerkkul ◽  
Surachai Dechkunakorn ◽  
Pornkiat Churnjitapirom ◽  
Theeralaksna Suddhasthira
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Steel Wire ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Stainless Steel Wire ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Bending Properties ◽  
Steel Wires ◽  
Significant Difference

The archwire is generally used in fixed appliances for orthodontic treatment to correct dental malocclusion. However, it is interesting to know whether general purpose stainless steel wire could replace commercial orthodontic archwire in orthodontic practice for economic reasons. The purpose of this study was to determine the bending properties of general purpose stainless steel wire compared with commercial orthodontic stainless steel wires after forming as an archwire for orthodontic use. The samples used in this study were 90 general purpose and 45 commercial (Highland) round stainless steel wires in 0.016, 0.018, and 0.020 sizes (30 general purpose and 15 commercial wires for each size). All 15 general purpose stainless steel wires with different sizes were formed into orthodontic archwire with a Universal Testing Machine. All samples were tested (three-point bending test) for mechanical properties. The results showed no significant difference between general purpose and commercial orthodontic wires in size 0.016 for 0.1 mm offset bending force, 0.2% yield strength, and springback. Although many mechanical properties of general purpose wires differed from commercial wires, their values conformed to other previous studies within the range of clinical acceptance. In conclusion, orthodontic formed general purpose round stainless steel wires had statistically different (p <0.05) mechanical properties from commercial orthodontic stainless steel wires (Highland) but the mechanical properties were acceptable to use in orthodontic treatment.

scholarly journals Three Palatal Arches Used to Correct Posterior Dental Crossbites

2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1047-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Lima Martinelli ◽  
Priscilla Sobral Couto ◽  
Antonio Carlos Oliveira Ruellas
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Elasticity Modulus ◽  
Steel Wire ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Stainless Steel Wire ◽  
Quad Helix ◽  
One Way Anova

Abstract Objective: To assess the force, resilience, and elasticity modulus produced by the Coffin appliance, “W” arch, and quad-helix made with 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch stainless steel wire. Materials and Methods: Two groups of 15 arches were made as Coffin appliances, two groups of 15 arches were made as “W” arches, and two groups of 15 arches were made as quad-helices. One group of each appliance was formed in 0.032-inch and one group in 0.036-inch stainless steel wire. All arches (6 groups of 15 each) were submitted to compression trials in the mechanical testing machine EMIC DL-10000, simulating 5-, 8-, 10-, and 12-mm activation. The force and resilience means received a one-way ANOVA statistical analysis. Results: The results showed that the mechanical properties depended on the shape of the appliance, the diameter of the wire used, and the amount of activation. Conclusions: The three appliances assessed produce appropriate forces for orthodontic treatment as long as they are correctly planned during clinical application.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document