Rapid Manufacturing of Biomedical Devices: Process Alternatives, Selection and Planning

2021 ◽  
pp. 77-104
Author(s):  
Sanchit Jhunjhunwala ◽  
Sajan Kapil
2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (12) ◽  
pp. 404-408
Author(s):  
Jun Ohta ◽  
Takuma Kobayashi ◽  
Toshihiko Noda ◽  
Kiyotaka Sasagawa ◽  
Takashi Tokuda
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz-Josef Kahlen ◽  
Aravinda Kar ◽  
Tom Watkins ◽  
C. Burl

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Sheng Lin ◽  
Ming-Yuan-Lee ◽  
Chih-Hui Yang ◽  
Keng-Shiang Huang

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1318
Author(s):  
Mariusz Deja ◽  
Dawid Zieliński ◽  
Aini Zuhra Abdul Kadir ◽  
Siti Nur Humaira

High requirements imposed by the competitive industrial environment determine the development directions of applied manufacturing methods. 3D printing technology, also known as additive manufacturing (AM), currently being one of the most dynamically developing production methods, is increasingly used in many different areas of industry. Nowadays, apart from the possibility of making prototypes of future products, AM is also used to produce fully functional machine parts, which is known as Rapid Manufacturing and also Rapid Tooling. Rapid Manufacturing refers to the ability of the software automation to rapidly accelerate the manufacturing process, while Rapid Tooling means that a tool is involved in order to accelerate the process. Abrasive processes are widely used in many industries, especially for machining hard and brittle materials such as advanced ceramics. This paper presents a review on advances and trends in contemporary abrasive machining related to the application of innovative 3D printed abrasive tools. Examples of abrasive tools made with the use of currently leading AM methods and their impact on the obtained machining results were indicated. The analyzed research works indicate the great potential and usefulness of the new constructions of the abrasive tools made by incremental technologies. Furthermore, the potential and limitations of currently used 3D printed abrasive tools, as well as the directions of their further development are indicated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Unkovskiy ◽  
Franziska Schmidt ◽  
Florian Beuer ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Sebastian Spintzyk ◽  
...  

The topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bases were printed with SLA and DLP methods using three build angles: 0°, 45° and 90°. The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A heat map was generated to display the locations of the deviations within the intaglio surface. The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to DLP (p < 0.001). The 90° build angle may provide the best trueness for both SLA and DLP. With regard to precision, statistically significant differences were found in the build angles only. Higher precision was revealed in the DLP angle of 0° in comparison to the 45° and 90° angles.


Author(s):  
Vamsi Krishna Balla ◽  
Subhadip Bodhak ◽  
Pradyot Datta ◽  
Biswanath Kundu ◽  
Mitun Das ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document