Arrest of the mitotic cell cycle and of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by MMS

1985 ◽  
Vol 201 (3) ◽  
pp. 558-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kupiec ◽  
Giora Simchen
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle

scholarly journals Dynamic Localization of Protein Phosphatase Type 1 in the Mitotic Cell Cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2000 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Bloecher ◽  
Kelly Tatchell
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Essential Gene ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Type I ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Bud Neck ◽  
Protein Phosphatase Type

Protein phosphatase type I (PP1), encoded by the single essential gene GLC7 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, functions in diverse cellular processes. To identify in vivo subcellular location(s) where these processes take place, we used a functional green fluorescent protein (GFP)–Glc7p fusion protein. Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy revealed GFP–Glc7p localizes predominantly in the nucleus throughout the mitotic cell cycle, with the highest concentrations in the nucleolus. GFP–Glc7p was also observed in a ring at the bud neck, which was dependent upon functional septins. Supporting a role for Glc7p in bud site selection, a glc7-129 mutant displayed a random budding pattern. In α-factor treated cells, GFP–Glc7p was located at the base of mating projections, again in a septin-dependent manner. At the start of anaphase, GFP–Glc7p accumulated at the spindle pole bodies and remained there until cytokinesis. After anaphase, GFP–Glc7p became concentrated in a ring that colocalized with the actomyosin ring. A GFP–Glc7-129 fusion was defective in localizing to the bud neck and SPBs. Together, these results identify sites of Glc7p function and suggest Glc7p activity is regulated through dynamic changes in its location.

scholarly journals A dependent pathway of gene functions leading to chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1982 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 718-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Wood ◽  
L H Hartwell
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Dependent Pathway

Methyl-benzimidazole-2-ylcarbamate (MBC) inhibits the mitotic cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at a stage subsequent to DNA synthesis and before the completion of nuclear division (Quinlan, R. A., C. I. Pogson, and K, Gull, 1980, J Cell Sci., 46: 341-352). The step in the cell cycle that is sensitive to MBC inhibition was ordered to reciprocal shift experiments with respect to the step catalyzed by cdc gene products. Execution of the CDC7 step is required for the initiation of DNA synthesis and for completion of the MBC-sensitive step. Results obtained with mutants (cdc2, 6, 8, 9, and 21) defective in DNA replication and with an inhibitor of DNA replication (hydroxyurea) suggest that some DNA replication required for execution of the MBC-sensitive step but that the completion of replication is not. Of particular interest were mutants (cdc5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 23) that arrest cell division after DNA replication but before nuclear division since previous experiments had not been able to resolve the pathway of events in this part of the cell cycle. Execution of the CDC17 step was found to be a prerequisite for execution of the MBC-sensitive step; the CDC13, 16 and 23 steps are executed independently of the MBC-sensitive step; execution of the MBC-sensitive step is prerequisite for execution of the MBC-sensitive step; execution of the MBC-sensitive step is prerequisite for execution of the CDC14 and 23 steps. These results considerably extend the dependent pathway of events that constitute the cell cycle of S. cerevisiae.

scholarly journals C-terminal HA tags compromise function and exacerbate phenotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bloom’s helicase homolog Sgs1 SUMOylation-associated mutants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matan Cohen ◽  
Michael Lichten
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Influenza ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Epitope Tag ◽  
Influenza Hemagglutinin ◽  
A Minor

AbstractThe Sgs1 helicase and Top3-Rmi1 decatenase form a complex that affects homologous recombination outcomes during the mitotic cell cycle and during meiosis. Previous studies have reported that Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 function is regulated by SUMOylation that is catalyzed by the Smc5-Smc6-Mms21 complex. These studies used strains in which SGS1 was C-terminally tagged with three or six copies of a human influenza hemagglutinin-derived epitope tag (3HA and 6HA). They identified SGS1 mutants that affect its SUMOylation, which we will refer to as SGS1 SUMO-site mutants. In previous work, these mutants showed phenotypes consistent with substantial loss of Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 function during the mitotic cell cycle. We find that the reported phenotypes are largely due to the presence of the HA epitope tags. Untagged SGS1 SUMO-site mutants show either wild-type or weak hypomorphic phenotypes, depending on the assay. These phenotypes are exacerbated by both 6HA and 3HA epitope tags in two different S. cerevisiae strain backgrounds. Importantly, a C-terminal 6HA tag confers strong hypomorphic or null phenotypes on an otherwise wild-type Sgs1 protein. Taken together, these results suggest that the HA epitope tags used in previous studies seriously compromise Sgs1 function. Furthermore, they raise the possibilities either that sufficient SUMOylation of the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 complex might still occur in the SUMO-site mutants isolated, or that Smc5-Smc6-Mms21-mediated SUMOylation plays a minor role in the regulation of Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 during recombination.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA repair gene RAD2 is regulated in meiosis but not during the mitotic cell cycle

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 3256-3257
Author(s):  
K Madura ◽  
S Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Repair Gene ◽  
Mrna Accumulation ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Dna Repair Gene

The expression of the RAD2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is elevated upon DNA damage. Here, we show that RAD2 transcript levels also rise approximately eightfold during meiosis but remain constant during the mitotic cell cycle. The period of maximal RAD2 mRNA accumulation during meiosis is consistent with a possible role of RAD2 in a late stage of recombination, in mismatch repair of heteroduplexes, or both.

Differential function and expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae B-type cyclins in mitosis and meiosis

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 2113-2125
Author(s):  
N Grandin ◽  
S I Reed
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Meiotic Cell ◽  
Cell Cycles ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Mitotic Cyclin

We have studied the patterns of expression of four B-type cyclins (Clbs), Clb1, Clb2, Clb3, and Clb4, and their ability to activate p34cdc28 during the mitotic and meiotic cell cycles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. During the mitotic cell cycle, Clb3 and Clb4 were expressed and induced a kinase activity in association with p34cdc28 from early S phase up to mitosis. On the other hand, Clb1 and Clb2 were expressed and activated p34cdc28 later in the mitotic cell cycle, starting in late S phase and continuing up to mitosis. The pattern of expression of Clb3 and Clb4 suggests a possible role in the regulation of DNA replication as well as mitosis. Clb1 and Clb2, whose pattern of expression is similar to that of other known Clbs, are likely to have a role predominantly in the regulation of M phase. During the meiotic cell cycle, Clb1, Clb3, and Clb4 were expressed and induced a p34cdc28-associated kinase activity just before the first meiotic division. The fact that Clb3 and Clb4 were not synthesized earlier, in S phase, suggests that these cyclins, which probably have a role in S phase during the mitotic cell cycle, are not implicated in premeiotic S phase. Clb2, the primary mitotic cyclin in S. cerevisiae, was not detectable during meiosis. Sporulation experiments on strains deleted for one, two, or three Clbs indicate, in agreement with the biochemical data, that Clb1 is the primary cyclin for the regulation of meiosis, while Clb2 is not involved at all.

scholarly journals The G1 Cyclin Cln3 Regulates Morphogenesis in Candida albicans

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo Chapa y Lazo ◽  
Steven Bates ◽  
Peter Sudbery
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Growth Medium ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Pathogen ◽  
Nutrient Inputs

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the G1 cyclin Cln3 initiates the Start of a mitotic cell cycle in response to size and nutrient inputs. Loss of Cln3 delays but does not prevent Start, due to the eventual Cln3-independent transcription of CLN1 and CLN2. When unbudded cells of the human pathogen Candida albicans were depleted of the G1 cyclin Cln3 they increased in size but did not bud. Thus, unlike S. cerevisiae, Cln3 is essential for budding in C. albicans. However, eventually the large unbudded cells spontaneously produced filamentous forms. The morphology was growth medium dependent; on nutritionally poor medium the polarized outgrowths fulfilled the formal criteria for true hyphae. This state is stable, and continued growth leads to a hyphal mycelium, which invades the agar substratum. Interestingly, it is also required for normal hyphal development, as Cln3-depleted cells develop morphological abnormalities if challenged with hyphal inducing signals such as serum or neutral pH. Taken together, these results show that, in C. albicans, Cln3 has assumed a critical role in coordinating mitotic cell division with differentiation.

scholarly journals The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA repair gene RAD2 is regulated in meiosis but not during the mitotic cell cycle.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 3256-3257 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Madura ◽  
S Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
Repair Gene ◽  
Mrna Accumulation ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Dna Repair Gene

The expression of the RAD2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is elevated upon DNA damage. Here, we show that RAD2 transcript levels also rise approximately eightfold during meiosis but remain constant during the mitotic cell cycle. The period of maximal RAD2 mRNA accumulation during meiosis is consistent with a possible role of RAD2 in a late stage of recombination, in mismatch repair of heteroduplexes, or both.

scholarly journals The SFP1 Gene Product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Regulates G2/M Transitions During the Mitotic Cell Cycle and DNA-Damage Response

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. 1419-1428
Author(s):  
Zhiheng Xu ◽  
David Norris
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Mitotic Cell Cycle ◽  
G2 Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Damage Response

Abstract In eukaryotic cells, checkpoint pathways arrest cell-cycle progression if a particular event has failed to complete appropriately or if an important intracellular structure is defective or damaged. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that lack the SFP1 gene fail to arrest at the G2 DNA-damage checkpoint in response to genomic injury, but maintain their ability to arrest at the replication and spindle-assembly checkpoints. sfp1Δ mutants are characterized by a premature entrance into mitosis during a normal (undamaged) cell cycle, while strains that overexpress Sfp1p exhibit delays in G2. Sfp1p therefore acts as a repressor of the G2/M transition, both in the normal cell cycle and in the G2 checkpoint pathway. Sfp1 is a nuclear protein with two Cys2His2 zinc-finger domains commonly found in transcription factors. We propose that Sfp1p regulates the expression of gene products involved in the G2/M transition during the mitotic cell cycle and the DNA-damage response. In support of this model, overexpression of Sfp1p induces the expression of the PDS1 gene, which is known to encode a protein that regulates the G2 checkpoint.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document