Objective evaluation of scintigraphic diagnosis of bone metastasis

1987 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 482-485
Author(s):  
A. Allende-Riera ◽  
J. Hdez-Armas ◽  
C. Oton-Sanchez
2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Ho Chung ◽  
Moo Suk Park ◽  
Young Sam Kim ◽  
Joon Chang ◽  
Joo Hang Kim ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18044-e18044
Author(s):  
H. Okada ◽  
M. Tamiya ◽  
S. Tokunaga ◽  
H. Daga ◽  
K. Taira ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-39
Author(s):  
F. Pérez Ángel ◽  
J. Sánchez Catalicio ◽  
L. Mohamed Salem ◽  
M.I. Castellón Sánchez ◽  
J.L. Navarro Fernández ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanxiao Liu ◽  
Jinlei Dong ◽  
Yelong Shen ◽  
Canhua Yun ◽  
Ruixiao Wang ◽  
...  

BackgroundAccurate diagnosis of bone metastasis status of prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming increasingly more important in guiding local and systemic treatment. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have increasingly been utilized globally to assess the bone metastases in PCa. Our meta-analysis was a high-volume series in which the utility of PET/CT with different radioligands was compared to MRI with different parameters in this setting.Materials and MethodsThree databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched to retrieve original trials from their inception to August 31, 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent investigators utilizing Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using an arm-based model. Absolute sensitivity and specificity, relative sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and superiority index, and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the diagnostic value.ResultsForty-five studies with 2,843 patients and 4,263 lesions were identified. Network meta-analysis reveals that 68Ga-labeled prostate membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) PET/CT has the highest superiority index (7.30) with the sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.99, followed by 18F-NaF, 11C-choline, 18F-choline, 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG), and 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT. The use of high magnetic field strength, multisequence, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and more imaging planes will increase the diagnostic value of MRI for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Where available, 3.0-T high-quality MRI approaches 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was performed in the detection of bone metastasis on patient-based level (sensitivity, 0.94 vs. 0.91; specificity, 0.94 vs. 0.96; superiority index, 4.43 vs. 4.56).Conclusions68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is recommended for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Where available, 3.0-T high-quality MRI approaches 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT should be performed in the detection of bone metastasis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18042-e18042
Author(s):  
Koji Takeda ◽  
Shinya Tokunaga ◽  
Haruko Daga ◽  
Hideaki Okada ◽  
Koichi Taira ◽  
...  

e18042 Background: The bone resorption biomarker sNTx has been previously shown to add value as an aid in the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with lung cancer. The objective of this prospective study was to determine if periodic sNTx measurements could lead to early diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with lung cancer. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed organ-confined lung cancer were enrolled. sNTx values were determined once each month using the OSTEOMARKTM serum NTx assay (Alere Medical). The presence or absence of bone metastasis was determined by monthly physical examination and by bone scintigraphy every 3 months for 12 months. All patients were required to provide written informed consent. Results: Forty patients were enrolled between June and December 2010. One patient withdrew early and was excluded from analysis. The mean +/- 1 SD baseline level of sNTx was 17.5 +/- 4.4 nM BCE/L. Five patients developed bone metastasis (as characterized by bone scintigraphy) during the study period. The level of sNTx in subjects with bone metastasis was slightly increased (21.6 +/- 3.2 nM BCE/L), however, in these patients, there was no statistically significant difference between sNTx values at baseline (18.2 +/- 4.2 nM BCE/L) and when metastasis was diagnosed. (p=0.176). When a cut-off value of sNTx was set to 22.0 nM BCE/L, the sensitivity and the specificity of detection of bone metastasis were 80.0% and 41.2%, respectively. Using this cut-off, the elevation of sNTx could predict bone metastasis at least one month before diagnosis by bone scintigraphy in all 5 patients, however, the specificity was relatively low for clinical implementation. Additionally, the sensitivity and the specificity of early detection of systematic spread of disease (including bone metastasis) were 70.6% and 45.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Periodic determination of sNTx in patients with organ confined lung cancer did not provide sufficient specificity for it to be used for the early diagnosis of bone metastasis or disease progression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document