Relationship between health behaviour and body mass index in the Serbian adult population: data from National Health Survey 2013

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloš Ž. Maksimović ◽  
Jelena M. Gudelj Rakić ◽  
Hristina D. Vlajinac ◽  
Nadja D. Vasiljević ◽  
Jelena M. Marinković
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengdong Yu ◽  
Hongjun Zhao ◽  
Li Pan ◽  
Jia Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyang Wang ◽  
...  

Objective. To estimate the additive interaction of body mass index (BMI) and family history of hypertension (FHH) on hypertension and explore whether the interaction could be influenced by behavioural risk factors. Methods. The cross-sectional data on 5791 participants were from the China National Health Survey in Gansu province in 2016. We assessed the additive interaction by calculating the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), the attributable proportion due to interaction (AP), and the synergy index (SI). Results. ORs for hypertension were highest in Han (13.52, 95% CI: 9.45 to 19.34) and Yugur (13.85, 95% CI: 8.48 to 22.63) with the combination of obesity and FHH. The interaction of BMI and FHH was significant in Han people, with the RERI, AP, and SI and their 95% CIs being 2.48 (1.13 to 3.82), 0.33 (0.19 to 0.47), and 1.61 (1.26 to 2.07) for overweight and FHH and 6.32 (1.91 to 10.73), 0.47 (0.27 to 0.67), and 2.02 (1.33 to 3.07) for obesity and FHH, respectively. The interaction of BMI and FHH was not significant in Yugur people. Adjustment for behavioural risk factors had little influence on the interactions, and risks of hypertension remained increased. Conclusions. BMI and FHH were associated with hypertension, and the interaction of BMI and FHH on hypertension was significant in Han but not in Yugur people. Behavioural risk factors had little influence on the associations and interactions. The exacerbation of hypertension risks by overweight or obesity in hypertension families deserves attention in weight control and community care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1041-1049
Author(s):  
Giovanna Valentino ◽  
Camila Hernández ◽  
Rodrigo Tagle ◽  
Lorena Orellana ◽  
Marcela Adasme ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Elyssia Karine Nunes Mendonça Ramires ◽  
Risia Cristina Egito de Menezes ◽  
Giovana Longo-Silva ◽  
Taíse Gama dos Santos ◽  
Patrícia de Menezes Marinho ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2246-2255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miloš Ž Maksimović ◽  
Jelena M Gudelj Rakić ◽  
Hristina D Vlajinac ◽  
Nadja D Vasiljević ◽  
Marina I Nikić ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe present study aimed to compare different indicators of obesity in the Serbian adult population.DesignCross-sectional study. A stratified, two-stage, national-representative random sampling approach was used for the selection of the survey sample. Data sources were questionnaires created according to the European Health Interview Survey questionnaire. Measurements of weight, height and waist circumference (WC) were performed using standard procedures. Anthropometric measures included BMI, WC and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR).SettingData for the study were obtained from the 2013 National Health Survey, performed in line with the EUROSTAT recommendations for performance of the European Health Interview Survey.SubjectsAdults aged ≥20 years.ResultsAccording to BMI, out of the whole studied population (12 460 adults of both sexes) 2·4 % were underweight, 36·4 % overweight and 22·4 % obese. Using WC and WHtR as measures of adiposity showed that 22·5 % and 42·8 % of participants were overweight and 39·8 % and 25·3 % were obese, respectively. Men and women differed significantly in all variables observed. Overweight was more frequent in men and obesity in women regardless of adiposity measure used.ConclusionsIn spite of strong correlations between BMI, WC and WHtR, substantial discrepancies between these three measures in the assessment of overweight and obesity were found, especially in some age groups. Which of these anthropometric measures should be used, or whether two or all three of them should be applied, depends on their associations with cardiovascular or some other disease of interest.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Santric Milicevic ◽  
Janko Jankovic ◽  
Goran Trajkovic ◽  
Zorica Terzic Supic ◽  
Uros Babic ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1005-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ausenda Machado ◽  
Rita Nicolau ◽  
Carlos Matias Dias ◽  
Ricardo Jorge ◽  
José Marinho Falcão

2007 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. S162
Author(s):  
F. Mardones ◽  
R. Mallea ◽  
P. Margozzini ◽  
C. González ◽  
X. Aguilera ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dante S. Harbuwono ◽  
Laurentius A. Pramono ◽  
Em Yunir ◽  
Imam Subekti

Background: Obesity and central obesity have become serious public health problems in developing countries such as Indonesia. Although 10 years have passed since the largest national health survey was conducted in 2007, no further analysis and publication concerning obesity and central obesity in Indonesia have been conducted based on the survey. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of obesity and central obesity, and its association with sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities in Indonesia.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted based on the National Basic Health Survey 2007 using total sampling method from 33 provinces. Obesity is defined as body mass index ≥25 according to the Asia-Pacific standard for obesity. Central obesity is defined as waist circumference >90 cm for men and > 80 cm for women according to the Asia-Pacific standard for central obesity.Results: The prevalence of obesity and central obesity in the Indonesian adult population are 23.1% and 28%, respectively. Both rates are higher in females than in males. Obesity and central obesity are associated with the risk of diabetes and hypertension.Conclusion: Prevalence of obesity and central obesity is high in the Indonesian adult population. Interventional programs are important to promote awareness of obesity and healthy lifestyle changes in the community.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document