Vancomycin-soaking of the graft reduces the incidence of septic arthritis following ACL reconstruction: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1005-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Hendrik Naendrup ◽  
Benedikt Marche ◽  
Darren de SA ◽  
Paola Koenen ◽  
Robin Otchwemah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Arthroscopic debridement has lower re-operation rates than arthrotomy in the treatment of acute septic arthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 307-312
Author(s):  
Taufiq Panjwani ◽  
Keng Lin Wong ◽  
Si Heng Sharon Tan ◽  
Glen Liau ◽  
Narendra Vaidya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Arthroscopic Debridement ◽  
Pertinent Data ◽  
Operation Rate

ImportanceSeptic arthritis of the native knee joint is the most common bacterial joint infection. The management involves prompt surgical debridement and joint irrigation by arthroscopy or arthrotomy. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare arthroscopic debridement with arthrotomy for septic arthritis of native knee joint.ObjectiveThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare re-operation rates, length of inpatient hospital stay (LOS) and functional outcome between arthroscopy and arthrotomy in the treatment of acute septic arthritis of the native knee joint.Evidence reviewThis study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from database inception to 31 May 2019. All original studies that compared re-operation rates and LOS between arthroscopy and arthrotomy for septic arthritis of knee were included. The research question and eligibility criteria were established a priori. Pertinent data were extracted and random-effects model was used to pool the data where possible.FindingsA total of seven studies with 1089 knees were included, of which 723 underwent arthroscopic surgery and 366 knees underwent arthrotomy. The relative risk of re-operation was significantly lower in the arthroscopy group with a pooled relative risk of 0.69 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.86; p=0.0006). All studies reported shorter LOS and one study reported better functional outcomes in the arthroscopy group as compared with arthrotomy. However, the data could not be quantitatively synthesised due to variation in reporting among the studies included.Conclusions and relevanceBased on the available evidence, we conclude that arthroscopy for the treatment of septic arthritis of the knee results in a lower re-operation rate than arthrotomy. It cannot be concluded whether arthroscopic treatment results in shorter LOS or better functional outcome as compared with arthrotomy.Level of evidenceIV

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Relationship With Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 036354652096448
Author(s):  
Apostolos D. Prodromidis ◽  
Chrysoula Drosatou ◽  
Georgios C. Thivaios ◽  
Nasri Zreik ◽  
Charalambos P. Charalambous
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Reconstruction Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult. Purpose: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears. Results: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Conclusion: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended. Registration: CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO)

Measuring only hop distance during single leg hop testing is insufficient to detect deficits in knee function after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Argyro Kotsifaki ◽  
Vasileios Korakakis ◽  
Rod Whiteley ◽  
Sam Van Rossom ◽  
Ilse Jonkers
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Knee Function ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Vertical Ground Reaction Force ◽  
Peak Knee

ObjectiveTo systematically review the biomechanical deficits after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) during single leg hop for distance (SLHD) testing and report these differences compared with the contralateral leg and with healthy controls.DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis.Data sourcesA systematic search in Pubmed (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, grey literature and trial registries, was conducted from inception to 1 April 2018.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies reporting kinematic, kinetic and/or electromyographic data of the ACLR limb during SLHD with no language limits.ResultsThe literature review yielded 1551 articles and 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis revealed strong evidence of lower peak knee flexion angle and knee flexion moments during landing compared with the uninjured leg and with controls. Also, moderate evidence (with large effect size) of lower knee power absorption during landing compared with the uninjured leg. No difference was found in peak vertical ground reaction force during landing. Subgroup analyses revealed that some kinematic variables do not restore with time and may even worsen.ConclusionDuring SLHD several kinematic and kinetic deficits were detected between limbs after ACLR, despite adequate SLHD performance. Measuring only hop distance, even using the healthy leg as a reference, is insufficient to fully assess knee function after ACLR.PROSPERO trial registration number CRD42018087779.

scholarly journals Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e033429
Author(s):  
Andrew Middlebrook ◽  
Sheree Bekker ◽  
Nicola Middlebrook ◽  
Alison B Rushton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Predicting Outcome ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

IntroductionInjuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are a common musculoskeletal complication and can cause significant reduction in patient function and quality of life. Many undergo ACL reconstruction, with high-quality rehabilitation key to successful outcome. Knowledge of physical prognostic factors, such as quadriceps strength, is crucial to inform rehabilitation and has important implications for outcome following ACL reconstruction. However, these factors predicting outcome are poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to establish physical prognostic factors predictive of outcome in adults following ACL reconstruction. Outcome will be subdivided into two groups of outcome measures, patient-reported and performance-based. Physical prognostic factors of interest will reflect a range of domains and may be modifiable/non-modifiable. Results will help decide most appropriate management and assist in planning and tailoring preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation.Methods and analysisThis systematic review protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases, key journals and grey literature will be searched from inception to July 2019. Prospective cohort studies including participants aged ≥16 years who have undergone ACL reconstruction will be included, with articles focusing on multi-ligament reconstructions and ACL repair surgery, or not published in English excluded. Two independent reviewers will conduct searches, assess study eligibility, extract data, assess risk of bias (Quality in Prognostic Studies tool) and quantify overall quality of evidence (modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines). If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted, otherwise a narrative synthesis will ensue focusing on prognostic factors, risk of bias of included studies and strength of association with outcomes.Ethics and disseminationFindings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences and locally to physiotherapy departments. Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019127732.

Movement Patterns of the Knee During Gait Following ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 1869-1895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandeep Kaur ◽  
Daniel Cury Ribeiro ◽  
Jean-Claude Theis ◽  
Kate E. Webster ◽  
Gisela Sole
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Movement Patterns

Vancomycin Presoaking of the Graft Appears to Prevent Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110116
Author(s):  
Francisco Figueroa ◽  
David Figueroa ◽  
Rafael Calvo ◽  
Alex Vaisman ◽  
Marilaura Nuñez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Reconstruction Methods ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Vancomycin presoaking of the graft has been shown to decrease infection rates in some case series of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Purpose: We sought to substantiate the efficacy of vancomycin presoaked grafts for the prevention of infection after ACL reconstruction. Methods: We performed a systematic review of Medline and OVID to assess the incidence of postoperative infection in studies comparing patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with the use of vancomycin presoaked ACL grafts and a control group of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction without the use of presoaked grafts. The efficacy of vancomycin presoaking was calculated using the Agresti-Coull confidence interval. Relative risk (RR) was calculated for every study and the total sample. Results: The 11 studies that met inclusion criteria comprised 24,298 patients. In patients with vancomycin presoaking of the graft, 1 infection was reported in 8764 cases (0.01% rate). In the studies with control groups that did not have vancomycin presoaked grafts, there were 125 infections in 15,534 ACL reconstructions (0.8% rate). The efficacy of vancomycin presoaking in preventing infection after ACL reconstruction was 99.9% (0.999%–1.000% CI). The overall RR obtained was 0.07 (0.03–0.16 CI). All included studies were retrospective cohort studies (level III). Conclusions: Vancomycin presoaking of the graft has been shown to decrease infection rates after ACL reconstruction in studies of low evidence level. This suggests the need for prospective randomized controlled trials addressing this issue so that recommendations on the routine use of vancomycin presoaking of ACL grafts can be made with confidence.

A systematic review of the optimal drainage technique for septic hip arthritis in children

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002198966
Author(s):  
Cornelia Maria Donders ◽  
Anne J Spaans ◽  
Johannes H J M Bessems ◽  
Christiaan J A van Bergen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Septic Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Scientific Quality ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Hip Arthritis ◽  
Drainage Technique

Introduction: The hip is one of the most commonly affected joints in paediatric septic arthritis. Drainage can be performed using arthrocentesis (articular needle aspiration), arthroscopy or arthrotomy. The objective of this systematic review was to identify the most effective drainage technique for septic hip arthritis in the paediatric population. Materials and methods: The electronic MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for original articles that reported outcomes of arthrocentesis, arthroscopy or arthrotomy for septic arthritis of the paediatric hip. Outcome parameters were additional drainage procedures, clinical outcomes and radiological sequelae. The quality of each of the included studies was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) score. Results: Out of 2428 articles, 19 studies with a total of 406 hip joints were included in the systematic review. Additional arthroscopy or arthrotomy was performed in 15% of the hips treated with arthrocentesis, in 14% after arthroscopy and in 3% after arthrotomy. Inferior clinical outcomes and more radiological sequelae were seen in patients treated with an arthrotomy. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the diversity and low quality of the studies (MINORS median 4 [range 2–15]). Conclusions: This systematic review gives a comprehensive overview of the available literature on treatment for septic hip arthritis in children. Arthrocentesis and arthroscopic procedures may have a higher risk of additional drainage procedures in comparison with arthrotomy. However, arthrotomy might be associated with inferior outcomes in the longer term. The included studies are diverse and the scientific quality is generally low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document