Comparison and evaluation of high-resolution marine gravity recovery via sea surface heights or sea surface slopes

2021 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengjun Zhang ◽  
Adili Abulaitijiang ◽  
Ole Baltazar Andersen ◽  
David T. Sandwell ◽  
James R. Beale
Author(s):  
Chengcheng Zhu ◽  
Xin Liu ◽  
Jinyun Guo ◽  
Shengwen Yu ◽  
Yupeng Niu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. V. Pokazeev ◽  
A. S. Zapevalov ◽  
K. E. Lebedev

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Fiifi Annan ◽  
Xiaoyun Wan

A regional gravity field product, comprising vertical deflections and gravity anomalies, of the Gulf of Guinea (15°W to 5°E, 4°S to 4°N) has been developed from sea surface heights (SSH) of five altimetry missions. Though the remove-restore technique was adopted, the deflections of the vertical were computed directly from the SSH without the influence of a global geopotential model. The north-component of vertical deflections was more accurate than the east-component by almost three times. Analysis of results showed each satellite can contribute almost equally in resolving the north-component. This is attributable to the nearly northern inclinations of the various satellites. However, Cryosat-2, Jason-1/GM, and SARAL/AltiKa contributed the most in resolving the east-component. We attribute this to the superior spatial resolution of Cryosat-2, the lower inclination of Jason-1/GM, and the high range accuracy of the Ka-band of SARAL/AltiKa. Weights of 0.687 and 0.313 were, respectively, assigned to the north and east components in order to minimize their non-uniform accuracy effect on the resultant gravity anomaly model. Histogram of computed gravity anomalies compared well with those from renowned models: DTU13, SIOv28, and EGM2008. It averagely deviates from the reference models by −0.33 mGal. Further assessment was done by comparing it with a quadratically adjusted shipborne free-air gravity anomalies. After some data cleaning, observations in shallow waters, as well as some ship tracks were still unreliable. By excluding the observations in shallow waters, the derived gravity field model compares well in ocean depths deeper than 2,000 m.


1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2201-2212 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Cragg ◽  
Gary Mitchum ◽  
W. Sturges

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-74
Author(s):  
M. Mostafavi ◽  
N. Delpeche-Ellmann ◽  
A. Ellmann

Abstract One of the major challenges of satellite altimetry (SA) is to produce accurate sea surface heights data up to the shoreline, especially in geomorphologically complex sea areas. New advanced re-tracking methods are expected to deliver better results. This study examines the achievable accuracy of Sentinel-3A (S3A) and Jason-3 (JA3) standard retrackers (Ocean and MLE4) with that of improved retrackers adapted for coastal and sea ice conditions (ALES+ SAR for S3A and ALES+ for JA3). The validation of SA data was performed by the integration of tide gauges, hydrodynamic model and high-resolution geoid model. The geoid being a key component that links the vertical reference datum of the SA with other utilized sources. The method is tested in the eastern section of Baltic Sea. The results indicate that on average reliable sea surface height (SSH) data can be obtained 2–3 km from the coastline for S3A (for both Ocean and ALES+SAR) whilst an average distance of 7–10 km for JA3 (MLE4 and ALES+) with a minimum distance of 3–4 km. In terms of accuracy, the RMSE (with respect to a corrected hydrodynamic model) of S3A ALES+ SAR and Ocean retrackers based SSH were 4–5 cm respectively, whereas with the JA3 ALES+ and MLE4 associated SSH RMSE of 6–7 cm can be achieved. The ALES+ and ALES+ SAR retrackers show SSH improvement within a range of 0.5–1 cm compared to the standard retrackers. This assessment showed that the adaptation of localized retrackers for the Baltic Sea (ALES+ and ALES+SAR) produced more valid observation closer to the coast than the standard retrackers and also improved the accuracy of SSH data.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
JL Poom ◽  
Josué Álvarez-Borrego ◽  
Ángel Coronel-Beltrán ◽  
Beatriz Martín-Atienza

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Zapevalov ◽  
◽  
I.P. Shumeyko ◽  
A.Yu. Abramovich ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document