Competitive adsorption, release and speciation of heavy metals in the Yellow River sediments, China

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingyun Fan ◽  
Jiang He ◽  
Hongxi Xue ◽  
Changwei LÜ ◽  
Ying Liang ◽  
...  
Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingfu Jin ◽  
Mengyao Wang ◽  
Wei Yue ◽  
Lina Zhang ◽  
Yanjun Wang

In this study, heavy mineral analysis was carried out in different size fractions of the Yellow River sediment to extract its end-members. It shows that heavy mineral contents, species, and compositions vary in different grain sizes. Distribution curve of heavy mineral concentration (HMC) and particle size frequency curve are in normal distribution. In most samples, the size fraction of 4.5–5.0 Φ contains the maximum HMC (18% on average). Heavy mineral assemblages of the Yellow River are featured by amphibole + epidote + limonite + garnet. Amphibole content is high in coarse fraction of >3.0 Φ and reaches its peak value in 3.5–4.5 Φ. Epidote is rich in a size fraction of >3.5 Φ, and increase as the particle size becomes fine. Micas content is high in coarse subsamples of <3.0 Φ, but almost absent in fine grains of >4.0 Φ. Metallic minerals (magnetite, ilmenite, hematite, and limonite) increase as the sediment particle size become fine, and reach the peak in silt (>4.0 Φ). Other minerals such as zircon, rutile, tourmaline, garnet, and apatite account for about 15%, and mainly concentrate in fine sediment. Further analysis reveals that similarity value between the most abundant grain size group and wide window grain size group is high (0.978 on average). The grain size of 4.0–5.0 Φ ± 0.5 Φ is suitable to carry out detrital mineral analysis in the Yellow River sediments. Our study helps to eliminate cognitive bias due to narrow grain size strategy, and to provide heavy mineral end-members of the Yellow River sediment for provenance discrimination in the marginal seas of East China.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Jing ◽  
L. Zhou ◽  
X. Ran ◽  
E. H. Ishida ◽  
Fangming Jin ◽  
...  

Geology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-18
Author(s):  
Le Li ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
David William Hedding ◽  
Yuanhe Fu ◽  
Maolin Ye ◽  
...  

Abstract The catastrophic landslide-dam outburst flood, possibly caused by the same earthquake that destroyed the well-dated Lajia archaeological site, in the upper reaches of the Yellow River in China, may provide an accurate constraint on the age of the first Chinese dynasty (Xia Dynasty), which, according to Chinese ancient documents, has been associated with flood-control activities. The key link between the destructive earthquake and the megaflood is a flood-related blackish sand layer (BSL) covering the Lajia site on terraces high above the Yellow River channel. However, the BSL, which mainly consists of debris of local schist, may have originated from mudflows in local gullies rather than an outburst flood from the Yellow River that swept predominantly schist debris from channel slopes and/or a landslide dam. The composition of the fine particles in the BSL can help to discriminate the provenance of the BSL because an outburst flood would consist of suspended particles from the Yellow River, while a mudflow origin would incorporate fine particles from the local gullies. However, the similar geological origin between the Yellow River sediments and the Quaternary eolian loess and Tertiary reddish clay sediments that feed the local gullies precludes the application of traditional geochemical source tracers. This work shows that the 234U/238U activity ratio, which reflects the comminution age, of the fine particles in the BSL is very similar to that of the Yellow River sediments but not to the sediments in the local gullies, supporting an outburst flood origin of the BSL. Thus, the emergence of the Xia Dynasty can be constrained to be shortly after the sudden destruction of the Lajia site, if the outburst flood is the same event that initiated nationalization as described in the Chinese ancient documents.


2019 ◽  
Vol 658 ◽  
pp. 268-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Liu ◽  
Dejiang Fan ◽  
Naishuang Bi ◽  
Xueshi Sun ◽  
Yuan Tian

2018 ◽  
Vol 488 ◽  
pp. 76-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongli Pang ◽  
Baotian Pan ◽  
Eduardo Garzanti ◽  
Hongshan Gao ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document