scholarly journals Validity of Routinely Collected Swedish Data in the International Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Database

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Xu ◽  
Ruzan Udumyan ◽  
Katja Fall ◽  
Olle Ljungqvist ◽  
Scott Montgomery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Missing Data ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Complete Information ◽  
High Agreement ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Relevant Variables ◽  
Swedish Data

Abstract Background This study aims to assess patient coverage, validity and data quality in the Swedish part of the International Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Interactive Audit System (EIAS). Method All Swedish ERAS centers that recorded colorectal surgery data in EIAS between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, were included (N = 12). Information registered in EIAS was compared with data from electronic medical records at each hospital to assess the overall coverage of EIAS. Twenty random-selected patients from each of the contributing centers were assessed for accuracy for a set of clinically relevant variables. All patients admitted to the contributing centers were included for the assessment of rate of missing on a selection of key clinical variables. Results Eight hospitals provided complete information for the evaluation, while four hospitals only allowed assessment of coverage and missing data. The eight hospitals had an overall coverage of 98.8% in EIAS (n = 1301) and the four 86.7% (n = 811). The average agreement for the assessed postoperative outcome variables was 96.5%. The accuracy was excellent for ‘length of hospital stay,’ ‘reoperation,’ and ‘any complications,’ but lower for other types of complications. Only a few variables had more than 5% missing data, and missingness was associated with hospital type and size. Conclusion This validation of the Swedish part of the international ERAS database suggests high patient coverage in EIAS and high agreement and limited missingness in clinically relevant variables. This validation approach or a modified version can be used for continued validation of the International ERAS database.

scholarly journals Swiss Validation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Database

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basile Pache ◽  
David Martin ◽  
Valérie Addor ◽  
Nicolas Demartines ◽  
Martin Hübner
Keyword(s):  
Missing Data ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Validation Criteria ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have considerably improved postoperative outcomes and are in use for various types of surgery. The prospective audit system (EIAS) could be a powerful tool for large-scale outcome research but its database has not been validated yet. Methods Swiss ERAS centers were invited to contribute to the validation of the Swiss chapter for colorectal surgery. A monitoring team performed on-site visits by the use of a standardized checklist. Validation criteria were (I) coverage (No. of operated patients within ERAS protocol; target threshold for validation: ≥ 80%), (II) missing data (8 predefined variables; target ≤ 10%), and (III) accuracy (2 predefined variables, target ≥ 80%). These criteria were assessed by comparing EIAS entries with the medical charts of a random sample of patients per center (range 15–20). Results Out of 18 Swiss ERAS centers, 15 agreed to have onsite monitoring but 13 granted access to the final dataset. ERAS coverage was available in only 7 centers and varied between 76 and 100%. Overall missing data rate was 5.7% and concerned mainly the variables “urinary catheter removal” (16.4%) and “mobilization on day 1” (16%). Accuracy for the length of hospital stay and complications was overall 84.6%. Overall, 5 over 13 centers failed in the validation process for one or several criteria. Conclusion EIAS was validated in most Swiss ERAS centers. Potential patient selection and missing data remain sources of bias in non-validated centers. Therefore, simplified validation of other centers appears to be mandatory before large-scale use of the EIAS dataset.

scholarly journals Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecological operations: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Nady Abdelrazik ◽  
Ahmad Sameer Sanad
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery on length of hospital stay, pain management, and complication rate. Results The length of hospital stay was reduced in ERAS groups when compared with the control groups (3.46 days vs 2.28 days; P < 0.0001; CI − 1.5767 to − 0.7833 for laparotomy groups and 2.18 vs 1.76 days; P = 0.0115; CI − 0.7439 to − 0.0961 for laparoscopy groups respectively). Intraoperative fluid use was reduced in both ERAS groups compared to the two control groups (934 ± 245 ml and 832 ± 197 ml vs 1747 ± 257 ml and 1459 ± 304 respectively; P < 0.0001) and postoperative fluid use was also less in the ERAS groups compared to the control groups (1606 ± 607 ml and 1210 ± 324 ml vs 2682 ± 396 ml and 1469 ± 315 ml respectively; P < 0.0001). Pain score using visual analog scale (VAS) on postoperative day 0 was 4.8 ± 1.4 and 4.1 ± 1.2 (P = 0.0066) for both laparotomy control and ERAS groups respectively, while in the laparoscopy groups, VAS was 3.8 ± 1.1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 (P = 0.0024) in control and ERAS groups respectively. Conclusion Implementation of ERAS protocols in gynecologic surgery was associated with significant reduction in length of hospital stay, associated with decrease intravenous fluids used and comparable pain control without increase in complication rates.

scholarly journals Developing implementation strategies to adopt Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines

BJS Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Y Lam ◽  
Alexandra Howlett ◽  
Duncan McLuckie ◽  
Lori M Stephen ◽  
Scott D N Else ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Local Contexts

Abstract Background Strong implementation strategies are critical to the success of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines, though little documentation exists on effective strategies, especially in complex clinical situations and unfamiliar contexts. This study outlines the process taken to adopt a novel neonatal ERAS® guideline. Methods The implementation strategy was approached in a multi-pronged, concurrent but asynchronous fashion. Between September 2019 and January 2020, healthcare providers from various disciplines and different specialties as well as parents participated in the strategy. Multidisciplinary teams were created to consider existing literature and local contexts including potential facilitators and/or barriers. Task forces worked collaboratively to develop new care pathways. An audit system was developed to record outcomes and elicit feedback for revision. Results 32 healthcare providers representing 9 disciplines and 5 specialties as well as 8 parents participated. Care pathways and resources were created. Elements recommended for a successful implementation strategy included identification of champions, multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement, consideration of local contexts and insights, patient/family engagement, education, and creation of an audit system. Conclusion A multidisciplinary and structured process following principles of implementation science was used to develop an effective implementation strategy for initiating ERAS® guidelines.

scholarly journals Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Interactive Audit System: 10 Years' Experience with an International Web-Based Clinical and Research Perioperative Care Database

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (01) ◽  
pp. 075-081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Currie ◽  
Nicolas Demartines ◽  
Kenneth Fearon ◽  
Robin Kennedy ◽  
Olle Ljungqvist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Data Governance ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Audit System

AbstractThe Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a managed care program that has shown the ability to reduce complications following elective colorectal surgery. In 2006, the ERAS® Society developed the ERAS® Interactive Audit System (EIAS), which has allowed centers in over 20 countries to enter perioperative patient data to benchmark against international practice within the audit system and act as a stimulus for quality improvement. The de-identified patient data are coded in SQL (a relational database), stored on secure servers, and data governance aspects have been secured in all involved countries. A collaborative approach is undertaken within involved units toward research questions with published cohort data from the audit system having demonstrated the importance of overall compliance on improving patient outcomes and less cost of care. The EIAS has shown that collaborative clinical effort can drive quality improvement in a short time frame in an international context.

Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynecology: are all items of equal importance?

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 810-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Basile Pache ◽  
Jonas Jurt ◽  
Fabian Grass ◽  
Martin Hübner ◽  
Nicolas Demartines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines in gynecologic surgery are a set of multiple recommendations based on the best available evidence. However, according to previous studies, maintaining high compliance is challenging in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of compliance to individual ERAS items on clinical outcomes.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of 446 consecutive women undergoing gynecologic oncology surgery (both open and minimally invasive) within an ERAS program from 1 October 2013 until 31 January 2017 in a tertiary academic center in Switzerland. Demographics, adherence, and outcomes were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression was performed, with adjustment for confounding factors. Main outcomes were overall compliance, compliance to each individual ERAS item, and impact on post-operative complications according to Clavien classification.ResultsA total of 446 patients were included, 26.2 % (n=117) had at least one complication (Clavien I–V), and 11.4 % (n=51) had a prolonged length of hospital stay. The single independent risk factor for overall complications was intra-operative blood loss > 200 mL (OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.6 to 6.89, p=0.001). Overall compliance >70% with ERAS items (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66, p=0.12) showed a protective effect on complications. Increased compliance was also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.435 to 0.93, p=0.001).ConclusionsCompliance >70% with modifiable ERAS items was significantly associated with reduced overall complications. Best possible compliance with all ERAS items is the goal to achieve lower complication rates after gynecologic oncology surgery.

Discrepancy in Postoperative Outcomes between Auditing Databases: A NSQIP Comparison

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (8) ◽  
pp. 1294-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Lyman ◽  
Michael Passeri ◽  
Allyson Cochran ◽  
David A. Iannitti ◽  
John B. Martinie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Audit System ◽  
Acs Nsqip ◽  
Outcome Reporting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared

In 2014, ACS-NSQIP® targeted pancreatectomies to improve outcome reporting and risk calculation related to pancreatectomy. At the same time, our department began prospectively collecting data for pancreatectomy in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery® Interactive Audit System (EIAS). The purpose of this study is to compare reported outcomes between two major auditing databases for the same patients undergoing pancreatectomy. The same 171 patients were identified in both databases. Clinical outcomes were then obtained from each database and compared to determine whether reported complication rates were statistically different between auditing databases. A combination of Wilcoxon rank sum and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to calculate statistical significance. No significant difference was appreciated in captured demographics between EIAS and NSQIP. Significant differences in reported rates for renal dysfunction, postoperative pancreatic fistula, return to the operative room, and urinary tract infection were noted between EIAS and NSQIP. Although significant differences in reported complication rates were demonstrated between EIAS and NSQIP for pancreatectomy, much of the discrepancy is attributable to subtle differences in definitions for postoperative occurrences between the two auditing databases. It is vital for surgeons to understand the exact definition that determines the complication rate for a given database.

The contribution of specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol elements to reduced length of hospital stay after ventral hernia repair

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 4638-4644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walker Ueland ◽  
Seth Walsh-Blackmore ◽  
Michael Nisiewicz ◽  
Daniel L. Davenport ◽  
Margaret A. Plymale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Eras Protocol

scholarly journals Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol Accelerates Recovery of Lumbar Disc Herniation among Elderly Patients Undergoing Discectomy via Promoting Gastrointestinal Function

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xiaohai Zuo ◽  
Linbang Wang ◽  
Longzhu He ◽  
Pei Li ◽  
Dandan Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Feeding Time ◽  
Gastrointestinal Function ◽  
The Difference

This study aimed to analyze the effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients with lumbar disc herniation after discectomy. A total of 179 patients with lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The non-ERAS group received routine nursing, and the ERAS group received ERAS strategy. The two groups were compared for general recovery indicators such as postoperative hemoglobin and prealbumin, satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. Gastrointestinal function was also evaluated, such as postoperative feeding time, intestinal chirping recovery time, intestinal exhaust gas recovery time, and complications such as ileus, nausea, and vomiting. The satisfaction of patients in the ERAS group (86.15 ± 2.43) was significantly higher than that in the non-ERAS group (77.19 ± 3.32), and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). The average time of eating in the ERAS group was 2.27 h after surgery. In addition, the amount of eating in the ERAS group was significantly better than that in the non-ERAS group, and the difference was statistically significant. In the ERAS group, intestinal chirping recovery time recovered to normal time, and exhaust recovery time and average defecation time were significantly shorter than those in the non-ERAS group. In the ERAS group, the average amount of hemoglobin and prealbumin decreased 3 days after operation, which was significantly lower than that in the non-ERAS group. To sum up, ERAS has an evident effect on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after discectomy of disc herniation, which can promote the recovery of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document